A Convex Approach Solving Simultaneous Mechanical Structure and Control System Design Problems With Multiple Closed-loop Performance Specifications

In this paper, a new integrated design method, referred to as the extended multiple simultaneous specification (EMSS) method, is proposed to solve simultaneous mechanical structure and control system design problems in which a set of n multiple closed-loop performance specifications must be simultaneously satisfied. To utilize this approach, all closed-loop performance specifications considered must have the property that they are convex with respect to the closed-loop system transfer matrix. With the proposed approach, a simply implemented two-stage design approach is used to determine a set of open-loop mechanical system design parameters and a closed-loop controller which simultaneously satisfies a set of n closed-loop performance specifications. In the first stage, for each closed-loop performance specification, one sample system, i.e., the closed-loop system with one set of mechanical design parameters with a closed-loop controller chosen from the set of all linear controllers, is determined by trial and error, such that the specification is satisfied. In the second stage, the transfer matrix of the final system, which satisfies all n performance specifications, is determined through the convex combination of the transfer matrices of n sample systems. A linear programming problem is solved to give the combination vector for this convex combination. With the closed-loop transfer matrix given, the mechanical design parameters, the closed-loop controller structure and its gains, are solved algebraically. In this paper, we establish conditions for the existence of a solution to this integrated design problem as well as prove that the EMSS approach retains the stability properties of the sample systems. Experimental results of the EMSS method, carried out on a linear positioning system are given, verifying the effectiveness of the proposed method. We note that the proposed EMSS method works well when the number of design parameters to be determined is small. Further, the proposed EMSS method also has some utility as a controller design method, to determine a closed-loop controller that satisfies a set ofn multiple closed-loop performance specifications, given a fixed mechanical system structure.

[1]  Arthur L. Hale,et al.  Optimal simultaneous structural and control design of maneuvering flexible spacecraft , 1985 .

[2]  Singiresu S. Rao,et al.  Game theory approach for the integrated design of structures and controls , 1988 .

[3]  J. S. Rastegar,et al.  Task-specific optimal simultaneous kinematic, dynamic, and control design of high-performance robotic systems , 1999 .

[4]  Dong Sun,et al.  Simultaneous mechanical structure and control system design: optimization and convex approaches , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE Internatinal Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[5]  Hugh H. T. Liu,et al.  Multiple simultaneous specifications control problem and its application , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[6]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Integrated structure/control design based on model validity and robustness margin , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[7]  J.K. Mills,et al.  Controller design for multiple simultaneous specifications with applications to robotic systems , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Hugh H. T. Liu,et al.  Multiple specification design in flight control system , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[9]  J. Junkins,et al.  Eigenvalue optimization algorithms for structure/controller design iterations , 1985 .

[10]  J.-H. Park,et al.  A control-configured flexible arm: integrated structure control design , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  K. Miyata,et al.  A simultaneous optimization algorithm for determining both mechanical-system and controller parameters for positioning control mechanisms , 1996, Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control - AMC '96 - MIE.

[12]  John L. Junkins,et al.  Robustness optimization of structural and controller parameters , 1989 .

[13]  Firdaus E. Udwadia,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of controlled structures , 1988 .

[14]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  On the Design of Structure and Controls for Optimal Performance of Actively Controlled Flexible Structures , 1987 .

[15]  S. Boyd,et al.  Example of exact trade-offs in linear controller design , 1989, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[16]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear controller design: limits of performance , 1991 .

[17]  Suresh M. Joshi,et al.  Experimental validation of optimization-based integrated controls-structures design methodology for flexible space structures , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications.

[18]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Optimal structural design with control gain norm constraint , 1987 .

[19]  Ke Fu,et al.  Convex integrated design (CID) method and its application to the design of a linear positioning system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.