Evaluating Transportation by Comparing Several uses of Rotary Endodontic Files.

AIM To evaluate the frequent use of ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) systems on shaping ability of root canal utilizing Solidworks (2014, Dassault Systemes) software. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six root canals in clear resin blocks (Dentsply-Maillefer) were allocated into six experimental groups (n = 36). Six new sets of PTN instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were used six times to shape the resin blocks. A #15 K-file was inserted to the working length (WL), followed by ProGlider (PG) to create a glide path. Sequential use of PTN instrumentation in a crown-down technique was used to reach size (30/07) apically. Macroscopic photos of the blocks were taken before and after instrumentation, layered by Paint Shop Pro 9 from JascSoftware, and then canal transportation was measured using Solidwork 2014. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Multivariate statistical analysis general linear model (GLM) was also applied. Bonferroni correction test was used in multiple comparisons and the statistical significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS There was no difference in canal transportation resulted from utilizing PTN files after six multiple uses; in addition, the PTN files showed ability to maintain the original canal anatomy, especially in the apical level, where lowest total mean value of canal center displacement was seen (3 mm level) (0.019 ± 0.017). CONCLUSION ProTaper Next files can be used to prepare single and multiple canals in a single furcated tooth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE ProTaper Next nickel-titanium (NiTi) file system is a safe instrument that respects the canal shape, allows practitioners to treat difficult cases with good results, and low risk of separation.

[1]  Mian K Iqbal,et al.  A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  Frederick R Liewehr,et al.  The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  Ya Shen,et al.  Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  J. Baumgartner,et al.  An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  A. Elnaghy,et al.  Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  R M Love,et al.  Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[7]  E Schäfer,et al.  Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[8]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  Influence of cross-sectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  Diogo Montalvão,et al.  Numeric comparison of the static mechanical behavior between ProFile GT and ProFile GT series X rotary nickel-titanium files. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  P R Wesselink,et al.  Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  E. Schäfer,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[12]  A. Ghoneim,et al.  Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  M Ahmad,et al.  The validity of using simulated root canals as models for ultrasonic instrumentation. , 1989, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  Ranjana Mohan,et al.  Root canal centering ability of rotary cutting nickel titanium instruments: A meta-analysis , 2014, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[15]  Davide Salvatore Paolino,et al.  Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  Emilia Ianes,et al.  How accurate replicates the Thermafil System the morphology of the apical endodontic space? An ex vivo study. , 2011, Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie.

[17]  Hakan Arslan,et al.  Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. , 2014, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  H. Steiman,et al.  Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  H Schilder,et al.  Cleaning and shaping the root canal. , 1974, Dental clinics of North America.

[20]  M Hülsmann,et al.  A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[21]  Edgar Schäfer,et al.  Critical evaluation of root canal transportation by instrumentation , 2013 .

[22]  Daiana GIANNASTASIO,et al.  Wizard CD Plus and ProTaper Universal: analysis of apical transportation using new software , 2013, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[23]  E Schäfer,et al.  Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[24]  B. Y. Cha,et al.  Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. , 2000, Journal of endodontics.

[25]  Howard E Strassler,et al.  Canal-centering ability of two rotary file systems. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  M. Koçak,et al.  Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems. , 2015, International endodontic journal.

[27]  F S Weine,et al.  The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. , 1975, Journal of endodontics.

[28]  Ove A Peters,et al.  Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.