Whose urban development? Changing credibilities, forms and functions of urbanization in Chengdu, China

Abstract In Chengdu, as in most other Chinese mega-cities, urbanization has been very rapid over the last three decades. In the current phase of urbanization, approximately 900,000 villagers in Chengdu alone have been resettled to urban-style settlements in order to release space for new arable land and to justify continued urbanization closer to the city. This article studies this new phase of urbanization in the countryside and contrasts it with the way in which urbanization took place in rural areas closer to the city in the past. The main focus is on the institutions regulating changes in the use of land when areas shift from rural to urban status. In the current phase of urbanization, far from the city centre, politically decided plans bargained far from rural communities play a much larger role than they did in earlier phases of urbanization that were closer to the city. The high-level political and financial nature of contestation on the rural fringe of Chengdu gives considerably less room for local communities to affect institutions than was afforded by earlier urbanization processes on the urban fringe. Although the fast state-controlled process entails more formal regulations than in the past, it also means less credible institutions because regulations may change almost overnight as a result of political decisions on which local residents have no influence. In the current situation, the article argues, the high degree of state control contributes to the preservation of old rural property rights institutions.

[1]  Lynette H. Ong State-Led Urbanization in China: Skyscrapers, Land Revenue and “Concentrated Villages” , 2013, The China Quarterly.

[2]  S. Heilmann,et al.  Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise , 2008 .

[3]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[4]  Kenneth G. Lieberthal,et al.  Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. , 1989 .

[5]  P. Ho In defense of endogenous, spontaneously ordered development: institutional functionalism and Chinese property rights , 2013 .

[6]  Kellee S. Tsai Off balance: The unintended consequences of fiscal federalism in China , 2004 .

[7]  P. Ho The ‘credibility thesis’ and its application to property rights: (In)Secure land tenure, conflict and social welfare in China , 2014 .

[8]  Chih-jou Jay Chen Transforming Rural China: How Local Institutions Shape Property Rights in China , 2004 .

[9]  M. Davis Planet of Slums , 2004 .

[10]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Political dynamics in land commodification: Commodifying rural land development rights in Chengdu, China , 2017 .

[11]  Andrew C. Mertha “Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process* , 2009, The China Quarterly.

[12]  A. Chan,et al.  Chen Village: Revolution to Globalization , 1984 .

[13]  J. Zeuthen Rule through Difference on China's Urban–Rural Boundary , 2012 .

[14]  Xiangbin Kong,et al.  China must protect high-quality arable land , 2014, Nature.

[15]  T. Li Visual Tour of Land' s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier , 2014 .

[16]  You-tien Hsing,et al.  Book Review: The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China , 2010 .

[17]  Filling the Institutional Void in Rural Land Markets in Southern China: Is there Room for Spontaneous Change from Below? , 2015 .

[18]  G. Lin China's Landed Urbanization: Neoliberalizing Politics, Land Commodification, and Municipal Finance in the Growth of Metropolises , 2014 .

[19]  D. Harvey The 'New' Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession , 2004 .