Thought for Food: Imagined Consumption Reduces Actual Consumption

All in the Mind Pavlov's experiments, in which dogs salivate in anticipation of food, mirror our own imagined experience; that is, thinking about the future consumption of chocolate enhances our desire for it and our motivation to obtain it. After several bites, however, our appetite usually wanes and the offer of a second bar is less appealing than the first. Morewedge et al. (p. 1530) show that the decrease in hedonic response can also be induced by having imagined eating the first bar of chocolate. In comparisons of subjects asked to imagine the repetitive consumption of candy or cheese, they observed a specific drop in the amount consumed when subjects were actually offered the previously imagined foods to eat. Imagining eating a food caused subsequent actual consumption of that food to decline. The consumption of a food typically leads to a decrease in its subsequent intake through habituation—a decrease in one’s responsiveness to the food and motivation to obtain it. We demonstrated that habituation to a food item can occur even when its consumption is merely imagined. Five experiments showed that people who repeatedly imagined eating a food (such as cheese) many times subsequently consumed less of the imagined food than did people who repeatedly imagined eating that food fewer times, imagined eating a different food (such as candy), or did not imagine eating a food. They did so because they desired to eat it less, not because they considered it less palatable. These results suggest that mental representation alone can engender habituation to a stimulus.

[1]  D. Kavanagh,et al.  Imaginary relish and exquisite torture: the elaborated intrusion theory of desire. , 2005, Psychological review.

[2]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  Sensory specific satiety in man , 1981, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural foundations of imagery , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Decety,et al.  The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior , 2006, Brain Research.

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Keeping One's Distance , 2008, Psychological science.

[6]  S. Tiffany,et al.  Imagery and smoking urges: the manipulation of affective content. , 1990, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  L. Epstein,et al.  Habituation of responding for food in humans , 2002, Appetite.

[8]  A. Roets,et al.  ‘When Suppression Backfires’ , 2006, Journal of health psychology.

[9]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  What Causes Humans to Begin and End a Meal? A Role for Memory for What Has Been Eaten, as Evidenced by a Study of Multiple Meal Eating in Amnesic Patients , 1998 .

[10]  L. Epstein,et al.  Habituation of salivation and motivated responding for food in children , 2003, Appetite.

[11]  A. Ivens,et al.  Sex Determination in the Social Amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2010, Science.

[12]  M. Dadds,et al.  Imagery in human classical conditioning. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  A. Jansen,et al.  Food liking, food wanting, and sensory-specific satiety , 2009, Appetite.

[14]  T. Curran,et al.  Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M. Tiggemann,et al.  Modality-specific imagery reduces cravings for food: an application of the elaborated intrusion theory of desire to food craving. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  C. Koch,et al.  Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? , 1995, Nature.

[17]  M. Bouton,et al.  Habituation as a determinant of human food intake. , 2009, Psychological review.

[18]  E. Rolls,et al.  How sensory properties of foods affect human feeding behavior , 1982, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Sensory-Specific Satiety Is Intact in Amnesics Who Eat Multiple Meals , 2008, Psychological science.

[21]  S. Swindell,et al.  General-process theories of motivation revisited: The role of habituation. , 1999 .

[22]  F. Mcsweeney,et al.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding. , 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Carolyn Copper,et al.  Does mental practice enhance performance , 1994 .

[25]  Erica L. Wohldmann,et al.  Pushing the limits of imagination: mental practice for learning sequences. , 2007, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[27]  K. Berridge Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[28]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[29]  P. Lang Imagery in therapy: an information processing analysis of fear , 1977 .

[30]  G. Badger,et al.  Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  K. Berridge Faculty Opinions recommendation of Thought for food: imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. , 2011 .

[32]  W. Mischel,et al.  Delay of gratification in children. , 1989, Science.