Intracranial bleeding in patients with traumatic brain injury: A prognostic study

BackgroundIntracranial bleeding (IB) is a common and serious consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI). IB can be classified according to the location into: epidural haemorrhage (EDH) subdural haemorrhage (SDH) intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Studies involving repeated CT scanning of TBI patients have found that IB can develop or expand in the 48 hours after injury. If IB enlarges after hospital admission and larger bleeds have a worse prognosis, this would provide a therapeutic rationale for treatments to prevent increase in the extent of bleeding. We analysed data from the Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN), a large European trauma registry, to evaluate the association between the size of IB and mortality in patients with TBI.MethodsWe analysed 13,962 patients presenting to TARN participating hospitals between 2001 and 2008 with a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) less than 15 at presentation or any head injury with Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity code 3 and above. The extent of intracranial bleeding was determined by the AIS code. Potential confounders were age, presenting Glasgow Coma Score, mechanism of injury, presence and nature of other brain injuries, and presence of extra-cranial injuries. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and haematoma evacuation. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the independent effect of large and small size of IB, in comparison with no bleeding, on patient outcomes. We also conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the independent effect on mortality of large IB in comparison with small IB.ResultsAlmost 46% of patients had at some type of IB. Subdural haemorrhages were present in 30% of the patients, with epidural and intraparenchymal present in approximately 22% each. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that large IB, wherever located, was associated with increased mortality in comparison with no bleeding. We also found that large IB was associated with an increased risk of mortality in comparison with small IB. The odds ratio for mortality for large SDH, IPH and EDH, in comparison with small bleeds, were: 3.41 (95% CI: 2.68-4.33), 3.47 (95% CI: 2.26-5.33) and 2.86 (95% CI: 1.86-4.38) respectively.ConclusionLarge EDH, SDH and IPH are associated with a substantially higher probability of hospital mortality in comparison with small IB. However, the limitations of our data, such as the large proportion of missing data and lack of data on other confounding factors, such as localization of the bleeding, make the results of this report only explanatory. Future studies should also evaluate the effect of IB size on functional outcomes.

[1]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[2]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system? , 2004, Injury.

[3]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10 008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[4]  Jamshid Ghajar,et al.  Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group , 2006 .

[5]  R. Bullock,et al.  Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[6]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury: the IMPACT study. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  S. Baker,et al.  The injury severity score: an update. , 1976, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  H. Patel,et al.  Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Follow-up of conservatively managed epidural hematomas: implications for timing of repeat CT. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  R. Narayan,et al.  Progression of traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  M. N. Chawdaa,et al.  Predicting outcome after multiple trauma : which scoring system ? , 2004 .

[12]  D. McArthur,et al.  Progressive hemorrhage after head trauma: predictors and consequences of the evolving injury. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  Ewout Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  G. Jain,et al.  Expanding traumatic intracerebral contusion/hematoma. , 2006, Neurology India.

[15]  T. Nose,et al.  Acute subdural hematoma--prediction of outcome with a linear discriminant function. , 1993, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[16]  R Bullock,et al.  Traumatic intracerebral hematoma--which patients should undergo surgical evacuation? CT scan features and ICP monitoring as a basis for decision making. , 1989, Surgical neurology.

[17]  Tzu-Kang Lin,et al.  The expectant treatment of "asymptomatic" supratentorial epidural hematomas. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[18]  S. Gelbard,et al.  The management of "asymptomatic" epidural hematomas. A prospective study. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  B. Walters,et al.  Part 1: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury , 2000 .

[20]  Juan Lu,et al.  Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics , 2008, PLoS medicine.