On Constraining Pilot Point Calibration with Regularization in PEST

Ground water model calibration has made great advances in recent years with practical tools such as PEST being instrumental for making the latest techniques available to practitioners. As models and calibration tools get more sophisticated, however, the power of these tools can be misapplied, resulting in poor parameter estimates and/or nonoptimally calibrated models that do not suit their intended purpose. Here, we focus on an increasingly common technique for calibrating highly parameterized numerical models-pilot point parameterization with Tikhonov regularization. Pilot points are a popular method for spatially parameterizing complex hydrogeologic systems; however, additional flexibility offered by pilot points can become problematic if not constrained by Tikhonov regularization. The objective of this work is to explain and illustrate the specific roles played by control variables in the PEST software for Tikhonov regularization applied to pilot points. A recent study encountered difficulties implementing this approach, but through examination of that analysis, insight into underlying sources of potential misapplication can be gained and some guidelines for overcoming them developed.

[1]  S. P. Neuman.  Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow models viewed as a multiple‐objective decision process under uncertainty , 1973 .

[2]  A Tikhonov,et al.  Solution of Incorrectly Formulated Problems and the Regularization Method , 1963 .

[3]  R. Hunt,et al.  Are Models Too Simple? Arguments for Increased Parameterization , 2007, Ground water.

[4]  M. Boucher,et al.  Interpretation of Interference Tests in a Well Field Using Geostatistical Techniques to Fit the Permeability Distribution in a Reservoir Model , 1984 .

[5]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration , 2007 .

[6]  M. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments , 1995 .

[7]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .

[8]  Mary C Hill,et al.  The Practical Use of Simplicity in Developing Ground Water Models , 2006, Ground water.

[9]  John Doherty,et al.  Ground Water Model Calibration Using Pilot Points and Regularization , 2003, Ground water.

[10]  Andres Alcolea,et al.  Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem , 2006 .

[11]  Mary C. Hill.  Observation errors and highly parameterized models , 2006 .

[12]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  REGULARIZATION OF INCORRECTLY POSED PROBLEMS , 1963 .