Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?

Previous neuroimaging studies of the Stroop task have postulated that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a critical role in resolution of the Stroop interference condition. However, activation of the ACC is not invariably seen and appears to depend on a variety of methodological factors, including the degree of response conflict and response expectancies. The present functional MRI study was designed to identify those brain areas critically involved in the interference condition. Healthy subjects underwent a blocked-trial design fMRI experiment while responding to 1 of 3 stimulus conditions: (1) incongruent color words, (2) congruent color words, and (3) color-neutral words. Subjects responded to the printed color of the word via a manual response. Compared to the congruent and neutral conditions, the incongruent condition produced significant activation within the left inferior precentral sulcus (IpreCS) located on the border between the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (BA 44) and the ventral premotor region (BA 6). Significant deactivations in the rostral component of the ACC and the posterior cingulate gyrus were also observed. Selective activation of the left IpreCS is compatible with findings from previous neuroimaging, lesion, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies and is presumably related to the mediation of competing articulatory demands during the interference condition. (JINS, 2002, 8, 735–742.)

[1]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[2]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Perret.  The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  T A Ketter,et al.  Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[5]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  E J Auerbach,et al.  Activity in the paracingulate and cingulate sulci during word generation: an fMRI study of functional anatomy. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  S Makeig,et al.  Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the stroop color-naming task. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. J. Lyman,et al.  Foveal and parafoveal processing of asynchronous Stroop stimuli. , 1987, British journal of psychology.

[12]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[14]  T. Feustel,et al.  Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields , 1979, Brain and Language.

[15]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[17]  J. Binder,et al.  Distributed Neural Systems Underlying the Timing of Movements , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Olson,et al.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Hemisphere differences in an auditory Stroop test , 1975 .

[22]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  C J Aine,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Event‐Related Potentials to Stroop Stimuli , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  George Bush,et al.  The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Tests for Comparing Images Based on Randomization and Permutation Methods , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Y. Guiard.  Effect of Processing Mode on the Degree of Motor asymmetry in the Manual Stroop Test , 1981, Cortex.

[29]  E. Cornish,et al.  The Percentile Points of Distributions Having Known Cumulants , 1960 .

[30]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[32]  A. Toga,et al.  Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis of Sulcal Variability in the Human Brain , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Davis,et al.  The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli. , 1974, Acta psychologica.

[34]  B. Vogt,et al.  Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.