Cognitive Abilities and Motivational Processes in High School Students' Situational Engagement and Achievement in Science

Building on Snow's (1989) idea of 2 pathways to achievement outcomes, a performance and a commitment pathway, this study examined how cognitive and motivational factors associated with each of these pathways, respectively, contributed to the prediction of achievement outcomes in science. The sample consisted of 491 10th- and 11th-grade high school students. Results of hierarchical regression analyses showed that (a) students' cognitive abilities were the strongest predictors of their performance in science as measured by standardized test scores; (b) motivational processes enhanced the predictive validity for science test scores and grades beyond the variance accounted for by ability; and (c) motivational processes were the strongest predictors of students' commitment to science in the form of situational engagement and anticipated choices of science-related college majors and careers. These results are consistent with Snow's (1989) conjecture that both performance and commitment pathway-related factors are necessary for understanding the full range of person-level inputs to achievement outcomes.

[1]  J. Meece,et al.  Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. , 1984 .

[2]  Haggai Kupermintz,et al.  Enhancing the Validity and Usefulness of Large-Scale Educational Assessments: III. NELS: 88 Mathematics Achievement to 12th Grade , 1997 .

[3]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[4]  Richard E. Snow,et al.  Aptitude Theory: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow , 1992 .

[5]  J. Connell,et al.  Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. , 1991 .

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  School and family effects on the ontogeny of children's interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. , 1992, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[7]  J. Russell,et al.  Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. , 1998 .

[8]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. , 1996 .

[9]  Frank Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs and General Mental Ability in Mathematical Problem-Solving , 1995 .

[10]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[11]  Jamal Abedi,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment , 1996 .

[12]  C. Hood,et al.  Education and Intelligence. , 1912 .

[13]  Carol S. Dweck,et al.  Motivational processes affecting learning. , 1986 .

[14]  J. Simpson.  WECHSLER'S MEASUREMENT AND APPRAISAL OF ADULT INTELLIGENCE , 1974 .

[15]  R. Savage.  Wechsler's Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence, 5th ed , 1974 .

[16]  A. Elliot,et al.  A HIERARCHICAL MODEL OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE ACHIEVEMENT MOTIVATION , 1997 .

[17]  Grades may reflect more than performance: Comment on Wentzel (1989). , 1991 .

[18]  E. Michael Nussbaum,et al.  Interview Procedures for Validating Science Assessments , 1997 .

[19]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[20]  J. Eccles,et al.  Sex differences in achievement patterns. , 1984, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[21]  J. Eccles.  Expectancies, values and academic behaviors , 1983 .

[22]  B. Weiner,et al.  Theories and principles of motivation. , 1996 .

[23]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Motivation to succeed. , 1998 .

[24]  A. Bandura.  Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and Functioning , 1993, Educational Psychologist.

[25]  E. S. Conklin.  Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[26]  D. Jackson,et al.  Individual differences in affective and conative functions. , 1996 .

[27]  B. B. Brown,et al.  Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement. An ecological perspective. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[28]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[29]  J. Eccles,et al.  Linking the study of schooling and mental health: Selected issues and empirical illustrations at.. , 1998 .

[30]  Richard E. Snow,et al.  Cognitive-conative aptitude interactions in learning. , 1989 .

[31]  D. Schunk.  Self-Efficacy Perspective On Achievement Behavior , 1984 .

[32]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[33]  J. Spence,et al.  Achievement and achievement motives : psychological and sociological approaches , 1984 .

[34]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[35]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[36]  J. Eccles,et al.  In the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefs , 1995 .