Elbow motion in the immunoglobulins involves a molecular ball-and-socket joint

Studies by electron microscopy, fluorescence polarization, hydrodynamics and X-ray crystallography have demonstrated the ability of different parts of immunoglobulin molecules to move relative to each other. This movement facilitates the multiple interactions that antibodies make with polyvalent antigens and effector proteins. Comparisons of the atomic structures of immunoglobulins of the same sequence in different crystal environments, and of those with different sequences, have shown that the movements involve local changes in the conformation of the peptides linking different domains. These changes occur in (1) the hinge regions that link the Fab fragment to the Fc, and (2) the switch regions that link the VL–VH dimer to the CL–CH1 dimer1–15. We show here that in immunoglobulins of known structure, the movement of the VL–VH dimer relative to the CL–CH1 dimer also involves the interactions of three VH and two CH1 residues that form the molecular equivalent of a ball-and-socket joint. The almost absolute conservation in the sequences of immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors of the residues that form these interactions suggests that this is a general feature of functional importance.

[1]  M. Perutz Stereochemistry of Cooperative Effects in Haemoglobin: Haem–Haem Interaction and the Problem of Allostery , 1970, Nature.

[2]  R. Poljak,et al.  The Three-Dimensional Structure of the Fab′ Fragment of a Human Myeloma Immunoglobulin at 2.0-Å Resolution , 1974 .

[3]  J Deisenhofer,et al.  Structure of the human antibody molecule Kol (immunoglobulin G1): an electron density map at 5 A resolution. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  D. Davies,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of an intact human immunoglobulin. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  L M Amzel,et al.  Preliminary refinement and structural analysis of the Fab fragment from human immunoglobulin new at 2.0 A resolution. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  C Chothia,et al.  Haemoglobin: the structural changes related to ligand binding and its allosteric mechanism. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J Deisenhofer,et al.  Crystallographic refinement and atomic models of the intact immunoglobulin molecule Kol and its antigen-binding fragment at 3.0 A and 1.0 A resolution. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  K. R. Ely,et al.  Marked structural differences of the Mcg Bence--Jones dimer in two crystal systems. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[10]  D. Davies,et al.  Structural basis of antibody function. , 1983, Annual review of immunology.

[11]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  Transmission of conformational change in insulin , 1983, Nature.

[12]  A M Lesk,et al.  Mechanisms of domain closure in proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  A third type of murine T-cell receptor gene , 1984, Nature.

[14]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Sequence relationships between putative T-cell receptor polypeptides and immunoglobulins , 1984, Nature.

[15]  Tak W. Mak,et al.  A human T cell-specific cDNA clone encodes a protein having extensive homology to immunoglobulin chains , 1984, Nature.

[16]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Complete primary structure of a heterodimeric T-cell receptor deduced from cDNA sequences , 1984, Nature.

[17]  W. Bennett,et al.  Structural and functional aspects of domain motions in proteins. , 1984, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[18]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  A third rearranged and expressed gene in a clone of cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1984, Nature.

[19]  T. Bhat,et al.  The galactan‐binding immunoglobulin Fab J539: An x‐ray diffraction study at 2.6‐Å resolution , 1986, Proteins.

[20]  R. Poljak,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of an antigen-antibody complex at 2.8 A resolution , 1986, Science.

[21]  Y. Satow,et al.  Phosphocholine binding immunoglobulin Fab McPC603. An X-ray diffraction study at 2.7 A. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  B C Finzel,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of an antibody-antigen complex. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Kretsinger,et al.  Crystal structure of an anti-Lewis alpha Fab determined by molecular replacement methods. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  A. Boodhoo,et al.  Crystallization and structure determination of an autoimmune anti-poly(dT) immunoglobulin Fab fragment at 3.0 A resolution. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[25]  M. Karplus,et al.  Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. , 1987, Science.

[26]  J. N. Varghese,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of a complex of antibody with influenza virus neuraminidase , 1987, Nature.

[27]  L. Prasad,et al.  Structure determination of a monoclonal Fab fragment specific for histidine-containing protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system of Escherichia coli. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.