Analysis of Wave III of Brain stem Auditory Evoked Potential Waveforms During Microvascular Decompression of Cranial Nerve VII for Hemifacial Spasm

Introduction: Intraoperative monitoring of brain stem auditory evoked potential during microvascular decompression (MVD) prevent hearing loss (HL). Previous studies have shown that changes in wave III (wIII) are an early and sensitive sign of auditory nerve injury. Objective: To evaluate the changes of amplitude and latency of wIII of brain stem auditory evoked potential during MVD and its association with postoperative HL. Hearing loss was classified by American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) criteria, based on changes in pure tone audiometry and speech discrimination score. Methods: Retrospective analysis of wIII in patients who underwent intraoperative monitoring with brain stem auditory evoked potential during MVD was performed. A univariate logistic regression analysis was performed on independent variables amplitude of wIII and latency of wIII at change max and On-Skin, or a final recording at the time of skin closure. A further analysis for the same variables was performed adjusting for the loss of wave. Results: The latency of wIII was not found to be significantly different between groups I and II. The amplitude of wIII was significantly decreased in the group with HL. Regression analysis did not find any increased odds of HL with changes in the amplitude of wIII. Conclusions: Changes in wave III did not increase the odds of HL in patients who underwent brain stem auditory evoked potential s during MVD. This information might be valuable to evaluate the value of wIII as an alarm criterion during MVD to prevent HL.

[1]  P. Gardner,et al.  Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring During Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Skull Base Surgery: Analysis of Observed Changes , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[2]  SungHee Kim,et al.  Results of auditory brainstem response monitoring of microvascular decompression: A prospective study of 22 patients with hemifacial spasm , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  R. Ramnarayan,et al.  Brain-stem auditory evoked responses during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: predicting post-operative hearing loss. , 2006, Neurology India.

[4]  M. Sindou.  Microvascular decompression for primary hemifacial spasm. Importance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[5]  C. Fischer,et al.  Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Intraoperative Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Changes and Warning Values to Prevent Hearing Loss—Prospective Study in a Consecutive Series of 84 Patients , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[6]  C. Fischer,et al.  [Microsurgical vascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Follow-up over one year, clinical results and prognostic factors. Study of a series of 100 cases]. , 2003, Neuro-Chirurgie.

[7]  M. Samii,et al.  Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for intraoperative monitoring of auditory function in 200 cases. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[8]  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma (Vestibular Schwannoma) ∗ : Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium , 1995 .

[9]  H. Jho,et al.  Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. , 1985 .

[11]  R. Lesser,et al.  Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in posterior circulation surgery. , 1983, Neurosurgery.

[12]  J. Maroon,et al.  Etiology and definitive microsurgical treatment of hemifacial spasm. Operative techniques and results in 47 patients. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  A. Møller,et al.  Correlation Between Latency and Amplitude of Peak V in the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials: Intraoperative Recordings in Microvascular Decompression Operations , 1998, Acta Neurochirurgica.