Simulation of Catalytic Oxidation and Selective Catalytic NOx Reduction in Lean-Exhaust Hybrid Vehicles

Physically-based models for diesel exhaust catalytic oxidation and urea-based selective catalytic nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction are used to study their impact on drive cycle performance of hypothetical light-duty diesel-powered hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles (HEVs and PHEVs). The models have been implemented as highly flexible SIMULINK block modules. The parameters of the NOx reduction model have been adjusted to reflect the characteristics of commercially available Cu-zeolite catalysts, which are of widespread current interest. The models are applied using the Powertrain System Analysis Toolkit (PSAT) software for vehicle simulations, along with a previously published methodology that accounts for emissions and temperature transients in the engine exhaust. Results illustrate that the diesel oxidation catalyst-selective catalytic reduction (DOC-SCR) combination can reduce carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and NOx emissions without creating a significant direct fuel penalty, but there is also an increase in the possibility of ammonia slip. Also, the addition of an upstream DOC increases aftertreatment thermal inertia, delaying light-off of the SCR catalyst. The emissions reduction efficiency of the DOC-SCR combination was found to be better for the simulated HEV compared to the simulated PHEV.

[1]  T. Johnson Diesel Emission Control in Review , 2001 .

[2]  Michael Duoba,et al.  Integrating Data, Performing Quality Assurance, and Validating the Vehicle Model for the 2004 Prius Using PSAT , 2006 .

[3]  Santhoji Katare,et al.  A Hybrid Framework for Modeling Aftertreatment Systems: A Diesel Oxidation Catalyst Application , 2006 .

[4]  Robert Larsen,et al.  In-Situ Mapping and Analysis of the Toyota Prius HEV Engine , 2000 .

[5]  C. S. Daw,et al.  A proposed methodology for estimating transient engine-out temperature and emissions from steady-state maps , 2010 .

[6]  Junmin Wang,et al.  Development and experimental studies of a control-oriented SCR model for a two-catalyst urea-SCR system , 2011 .

[7]  Alfons Baiker,et al.  Global kinetic modeling of reactions occurring during selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over vanadia/titania-based catalysts , 1998 .

[8]  Woo-Seung Kim,et al.  Re-evaluation and Modeling of a Commercial Diesel Oxidation Catalyst , 2009 .

[9]  W. Epling,et al.  Effect of hydrocarbon species on no oxidation over diesel oxidation catalysts , 2009 .

[10]  Young Sun Mok,et al.  Modeling of monolith reactor washcoated with CuZSM5 catalyst for removing NO from diesel engine by urea , 2006 .

[11]  Zhiming Gao,et al.  Comparisons of the simulated emissions and fuel efficiencies of diesel and gasoline hybrid electric vehicles , 2011 .

[12]  Zhiming Gao,et al.  Lean NOx Trap Modeling for Vehicle Systems Simulations , 2010 .

[13]  Dennis N. Assanis,et al.  Global Kinetics for Platinum Diesel Oxidation Catalysts , 2007 .

[14]  Johann C. Wurzenberger,et al.  Multi-scale SCR modeling, 1D kinetic analysis and 3D system simulation , 2005 .

[15]  John H. Johnson,et al.  An Experimental and Numerical Study of the Performance Characteristics of the Diesel Oxidation Catalyst in a Continuously Regenerating Particulate Filter , 2003 .

[16]  Louise Olsson,et al.  Detailed kinetic modeling of NH3 SCR over Cu-ZSM-5 , 2009 .

[17]  Ulrich Nieken,et al.  A global description of DOC kinetics for catalysts with different platinum loadings and aging status , 2010 .

[18]  Mehrdad Ahmadinejad,et al.  Modeling of Non-Road Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems: Diesel Oxidation and Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalysts , 2010 .

[19]  Grigorios C. Koltsakis,et al.  NO2-Assisted Regeneration of Diesel Particulate Filters: A Modeling Study , 2002 .

[20]  D. Chatterjee,et al.  Numerical Simulation of DOC+DPF+SCR Systems: DOC Influence on SCR Performance , 2008 .

[21]  Seung Wook Baek,et al.  Kinetic Parameter Estimation of a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst under Actual Vehicle Operating Conditions , 2008 .

[22]  J. E. Patterson,et al.  Diesel Aftertreatment Modeling: A Systems Approach to NOx Control , 2007 .

[23]  Makoto Nagata,et al.  Modeling of Diesel Oxidation Catalyst , 2005 .

[24]  Paul Spurk,et al.  Challenges for the Future Diesel Engines Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment System , 2007 .

[25]  Philip Gerald Blakeman,et al.  Developments In Diesel Emission Aftertreatment Technology , 2003 .

[26]  Paul Spurk,et al.  Modeling of SCR DeNOx Catalyst - Looking at the Impact of Substrate Attributes , 2003 .

[27]  E. Tronconi,et al.  SCR-DeNOx for diesel engine exhaust aftertreatment: unsteady-state kinetic study and monolith reactor modelling , 2004 .

[28]  James A. Dumesic,et al.  Kinetics of Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide by Ammonia over Vanadia/Titania , 1996 .

[29]  Yongsheng He,et al.  Development of an Integrated Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Simulation Tool with Applications in Aftertreatment System Architecture Design , 2007 .

[30]  Pio Forzatti,et al.  Transient kinetic study of the SCR-DeNOx reaction , 1998 .

[31]  F. Piscaglia,et al.  A novel 1D approach for the simulation of unsteady reacting flows in diesel exhaust after-treatment systems , 2009 .

[32]  Michael Duoba,et al.  Testing and Analysis of Three Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007 .

[33]  Dennis N. Assanis,et al.  Hydrocarbon storage modeling for diesel oxidation catalysts , 2008 .

[34]  M. Votsmeier,et al.  Dynamic phenomena of SCR-catalysts containing Fe-exchanged zeolites – experiments and computer simulations , 2007 .

[35]  Louise Olsson,et al.  A kinetic model for ammonia selective catalytic reduction over Cu-ZSM-5 , 2008 .