On the Relationships between Connection Modes and Workgroup Performance The Moderating Role of Group Size and Task Complexity

Notwithstanding the central place covered inside organization science and the economic theory of the firm, organization design theory still lacks sound building blocks concerning the effects that some fundamental variables have on workgroup performance. In this chapter a contribution to fill in this gap is given with reference to the relationships between connection modes and performance. In particular, through an agent-based simulation model a number of experiments have been done respect to the moderating role played by group size and task complexity. Results confirm current (but not really scientific) knowledge, and bring forth our understanding of these fundamental (and mostly nonlinear) relationships. Among the main results, it can be underlined that the best combinations between connection modes, task complexity, and workgroup size occur when complex tasks are connected by mutual adaptation and run by a small number of agents, or when less complex tasks are connected by parallel or sequential interdependence and performed by a large number of agents. Moreover, when a modules volume to be worked out is heterogeneous in terms of connection modes between module’s tasks, and thus, a multi-mode group should be issued, respect to the corresponding choice of issuing specialized groups there is a general decrease in efficacy.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  The Firm as an Incentive System , 1994 .

[2]  O. Williamson The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Santi Furnari,et al.  A Chemistry of Organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design , 2008 .

[4]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[5]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[6]  Thomas Gulløv Longhi Structural limitations in Organizational Design: The integration-differentiation paradigm , 2006 .

[7]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[8]  Michael Dietrich,et al.  Economics and theory of the firm , 2012 .

[9]  R. Radner The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[10]  Hao Li,et al.  Hierarchies and information-processing organizations , 1999 .

[11]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[12]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[13]  Richard M. Burton,et al.  The Future of Organization Design: An Interpretative Synthesis in Three Themes , 2013 .

[14]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving , 2005 .

[15]  Jay R. Galbraith The Future of Organization Design , 2012 .

[16]  J. Child Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study , 1972 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[18]  H. Baligh Decision Rules and Transactions, Organizations and Markets , 1986 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[20]  Jean Tirole,et al.  The theory of the firm , 1989 .

[21]  Timothy Van Zandt,et al.  Continuous Approximations in the Study of Hierarchies , 1995 .

[22]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[23]  M. Kiggundu,et al.  Task Interdependence and the Theory of Job Design , 1981 .

[24]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Simulation modeling in organizational and management research , 2007 .

[25]  M. Delmastro,et al.  Some stylized facts on organization and its evolution , 1999 .

[26]  Kirsten Foss,et al.  Organizing Technological Interdependencies: A Coordination Perspective on the Firm , 2001 .

[27]  E. Sevi Effects of organizational citizenship behaviour on group performance , 2010 .

[28]  L. Hurwicz The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation , 1973 .

[29]  O. Williamson Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[31]  Børge Obel,et al.  Design rules for dynamic organization design: the contribution of computational modeling , 2013 .

[32]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[33]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies , 1984 .

[34]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  The dynamics of organizational structures and performances under diverging distributions of knowledge and different power structures , 2014, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[35]  A. Grandori Integrating economic and organization theory: products, problems and prospects: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory , 2013 .

[36]  M. Delmastro,et al.  The Determinants of the Management Hierarchy: Evidence from Italian Plants , 2002 .

[37]  Kathleen M. Carley Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behavior of humans , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[38]  R. Radner Hierarchy: The Economics On Managing , 1990 .

[39]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[40]  Bojan Babić,et al.  Axiomatic design of flexible manufacturing systems , 1999 .

[41]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Growth and Decline Processes in Organizations. , 1975 .

[42]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Thomas Marschak,et al.  Network Mechanisms, Informational Efficiency, and Hierarchies , 1998 .

[44]  H. Bo,et al.  Agency Theory, Corporate Governance, and Finance , 2012 .

[45]  Danny Miller,et al.  What Happened to Organization Theory? , 2009 .

[46]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Behavior in Organizations: The Third Scientific Discipline , 2000 .

[47]  Guido Fioretti,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation Models in Organization Science , 2011 .

[48]  D. Pugh,et al.  Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1969 .

[49]  Lucio Biggiero,et al.  Sources of Complexity in Human Systems , 2012 .

[50]  Pietro Terna,et al.  How to build and use agent-based models in social science , 2000 .