The functional importance of structure in unstructured protein regions.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Teilum,et al. Behaviour of intrinsically disordered proteins in protein–protein complexes with an emphasis on fuzziness , 2017, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[2] H. Dyson,et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation , 2014, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[3] Adam J. Trexler,et al. Allostery in a disordered protein: oxidative modifications to α-synuclein act distally to regulate membrane binding. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[4] Diana M. Mitrea,et al. Phase separation in biology; functional organization of a higher order , 2016, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[5] Anton Meinhart,et al. Recognition of RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain by 3′-RNA-processing factors , 2004, Nature.
[6] P. Jemth,et al. Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.
[7] Michael P. Sheetz,et al. Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.
[8] Neil Bate,et al. Activation of a vinculin‐binding site in the talin rod involves rearrangement of a five‐helix bundle , 2004 .
[9] Do-Hyoung Kim,et al. PreSMo Target-Binding Signatures in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2018, Molecules and cells.
[10] J. Clarke,et al. Conserved Helix-Flanking Prolines Modulate Intrinsically Disordered Protein:Target Affinity by Altering the Lifetime of the Bound Complex , 2017, Biochemistry.
[11] Monika Fuxreiter,et al. The Structure and Dynamics of Higher-Order Assemblies: Amyloids, Signalosomes, and Granules , 2016, Cell.
[12] Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al. DIBS: a repository of disordered binding sites mediating interactions with ordered proteins , 2017, Bioinform..
[13] R. Pappu,et al. Collapse Transitions of Proteins and the Interplay Among Backbone, Sidechain, and Solvent Interactions. , 2018, Annual review of biophysics.
[14] D. Licatalosi,et al. Functional interaction of yeast pre-mRNA 3' end processing factors with RNA polymerase II. , 2002, Molecular cell.
[15] P. Tompa. On the supertertiary structure of proteins. , 2012, Nature chemical biology.
[16] S. Alberti. Phase separation in biology , 2017, Current Biology.
[17] Toby J Gibson,et al. Cell regulation: determined to signal discrete cooperation. , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[18] Alex Bateman,et al. Tissue-Specific Splicing of Disordered Segments that Embed Binding Motifs Rewires Protein Interaction Networks , 2012, Molecular cell.
[19] D. Leung,et al. The nucleotide switch in Cdc42 modulates coupling between the GTPase-binding and allosteric equilibria of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[20] Geoffrey Woollard,et al. Structure and intrinsic disorder in protein autoinhibition. , 2013, Structure.
[21] Ji Yu,et al. Fast rebinding increases dwell time of Src homology 2 (SH2)-containing proteins near the plasma membrane , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22] G. Storz,et al. Structural basis for redox regulation of Yap1 transcription factor localization , 2004, Nature.
[23] Sheena E Radford,et al. N‐terminal acetylation of α‐synuclein induces increased transient helical propensity and decreased aggregation rates in the intrinsically disordered monomer , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[24] J. Forman-Kay,et al. From sequence and forces to structure, function, and evolution of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2013, Structure.
[25] G. Goobes,et al. A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP , 2016, Journal of biomolecular NMR.
[26] Norman E. Davey,et al. Motif switches: decision-making in cell regulation. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.
[27] Philipp Selenko,et al. Structural disorder of monomeric α-synuclein persists in mammalian cells , 2016, Nature.
[28] Monika Fuxreiter,et al. Fold or not to fold upon binding - does it really matter? , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.
[29] Katrine Bugge,et al. Extreme disorder in an ultrahigh-affinity protein complex , 2018, Nature.
[30] P. Bernadó,et al. The Unique Domain Forms a Fuzzy Intramolecular Complex in Src Family Kinases. , 2017, Structure.
[31] M. Madan Babu,et al. A million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. , 2014, Molecular cell.
[32] V. Hilser,et al. The ensemble nature of allostery , 2014, Nature.
[33] E. Lemke,et al. Floppy but not sloppy: Interaction mechanism of FG-nucleoporins and nuclear transport receptors , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[34] M. Lewitzky,et al. Beyond ‘furballs’ and ‘dumpling soups’ – towards a molecular architecture of signaling complexes and networks , 2012, FEBS letters.
[35] Hao Wu,et al. Structural Insights into the Assembly of Large Oligomeric Signalosomes in the Toll-Like Receptor–Interleukin-1 Receptor Superfamily , 2012, Science Signaling.
[36] M. Rapé,et al. Multisite dependency of an E3 ligase controls monoubiquitylation-dependent cell fate decisions , 2018, eLife.
[37] Diana M. Mitrea,et al. Regulated unfolding of proteins in signaling , 2013, FEBS letters.
[38] T. Alber,et al. High-affinity interactions of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) and CD40 require TRAF trimerization and CD40 multimerization. , 1999, Biochemistry.
[39] B. Schuler,et al. Single-molecule spectroscopy reveals polymer effects of disordered proteins in crowded environments , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] A. Panchenko,et al. Evolutionary, physicochemical, and functional mechanisms of protein homooligomerization. , 2013, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.
[41] T. Pawson,et al. Cell Signaling in Space and Time: Where Proteins Come Together and When They’re Apart , 2009, Science.
[42] Amit Kumar,et al. Phosphorylation-induced unfolding regulates p19INK4d during the human cell cycle , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[43] P. Simister,et al. Self-Organization and Regulation of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with Folded N-Termini , 2011, PLoS biology.
[44] C. Macdonald,et al. The Two-State Prehensile Tail of the Antibacterial Toxin Colicin N , 2017, Biophysical journal.
[45] D. Morrison,et al. Unlocking the code of 14-3-3 , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.
[46] Zhenbao Yu,et al. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the functional cytoplasmic subdomain of human ephrin B2, a cell-surface ligand with bidirectional signaling properties. , 2002, Biochemistry.
[47] C. Dieterich,et al. Disorder and residual helicity alter p53-Mdm2 binding affinity and signaling in cells. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.
[48] R. Riek,et al. Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins , 2018, Science Advances.
[49] Y. Ivarsson,et al. High-throughput methods for identification of protein-protein interactions involving short linear motifs , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[50] L. Kay,et al. Folding of an intrinsically disordered protein by phosphorylation as a regulatory switch , 2014, Nature.
[51] Aidan Budd,et al. Short linear motifs: ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. , 2014, Chemical reviews.
[52] H. Dyson,et al. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[53] Philipp Selenko,et al. Structural Biology outside the box-inside the cell. , 2017, Current opinion in structural biology.
[54] Geoff Kelly,et al. Phosphorylation-mediated unfolding of a KH domain regulates KSRP localization via 14-3-3 binding , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[55] J. Warwicker,et al. Effect of phosphorylation on α-helix stability as a function of position , 2002 .
[56] H. Wu,et al. Thermodynamic characterization of the interaction between TRAF2 and tumor necrosis factor receptor peptides by isothermal titration calorimetry. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[57] Ylva Ivarsson,et al. Affinity and specificity of motif-based protein-protein interactions. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.
[58] P. Tompa. The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins , 2005, FEBS letters.
[59] Sarah A. Clark,et al. Multivalent IDP assemblies: Unique properties of LC8‐associated, IDP duplex scaffolds , 2015, FEBS letters.
[60] A. Dunker,et al. Orderly order in protein intrinsic disorder distribution: disorder in 3500 proteomes from viruses and the three domains of life , 2012, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[61] G. Pielak,et al. A cell is more than the sum of its (dilute) parts: A brief history of quinary structure , 2017, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[62] V. Corces,et al. Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture , 2018, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[63] Julie D Forman-Kay,et al. Modulation of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Function by Post-translational Modifications , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[64] Sonia Longhi,et al. DisProt 7.0: a major update of the database of disordered proteins , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..
[65] Norman E. Davey,et al. The switches.ELM Resource: A Compendium of Conditional Regulatory Interaction Interfaces , 2013, Science Signaling.
[66] V. Hilser,et al. Intrinsic disorder as a mechanism to optimize allosteric coupling in proteins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[67] Christopher J. Oldfield,et al. Classification of Intrinsically Disordered Regions and Proteins , 2014, Chemical reviews.
[68] Norman E. Davey,et al. Attributes of short linear motifs. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.
[69] A. Hausrath,et al. Conditionally disordered proteins: bringing the environment back into the fold , 2017, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[70] Veronika Csizmok,et al. Complex regulatory mechanisms mediated by the interplay of multiple post-translational modifications. , 2018, Current opinion in structural biology.
[71] Toby J. Gibson,et al. The eukaryotic linear motif resource – 2018 update , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..
[72] J. Clarke,et al. Folding and binding pathways of BH3-only proteins are encoded within their intrinsically disordered sequence, not templated by partner proteins , 2018, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[73] M. Brunori,et al. How Robust Is the Mechanism of Folding-Upon-Binding for an Intrinsically Disordered Protein? , 2018, Biophysical journal.
[74] Martin Blackledge,et al. Characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins and their dynamic complexes: From in vitro to cell-like environments. , 2018, Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
[75] Alan M. Moses,et al. Short linear motifs – ex nihilo evolution of protein regulation , 2015, Cell Communication and Signaling.
[76] Norman E. Davey,et al. Building a Regulatory Network with Short Linear Sequence Motifs: Lessons from the Degrons of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex. , 2016, Molecular cell.
[77] M. Blackledge,et al. Structural Impact of Tau Phosphorylation at Threonine 231. , 2015, Structure.
[78] A. Fersht,et al. Long-Range Modulation of Chain Motions within the Intrinsically Disordered Transactivation Domain of Tumor Suppressor p53 , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[79] K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al. A phosphorylation-motif for tuneable helix stabilisation in intrinsically disordered proteins - Lessons from the sodium proton exchanger 1 (NHE1). , 2017, Cellular signalling.
[80] P. Tompa,et al. Structural Disorder in Eukaryotes , 2012, PloS one.
[81] J. Qin,et al. Concerted dephosphorylation of the transcription factor NFAT1 induces a conformational switch that regulates transcriptional activity. , 2000, Molecular cell.
[82] H. Dyson,et al. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[83] Norman E. Davey,et al. The Mitotic Checkpoint Complex Requires an Evolutionary Conserved Cassette to Bind and Inhibit Active APC/C , 2016, Molecular cell.