Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: a case study in China.

A life cycle assessment was conducted using IMPACT2002+ to estimate the environmental impact of producing printing and writing paper, which is entirely made with wastepaper. To confirm and add credibility to the study, uncertainty analysis was conducted using Taylor series expansion. Printing and writing paper produced from wood pulp was assessed for comparison. Compared with the wood pulp contained scenario, printing and writing paper made from wastepaper represented environmental benefit on non-carcinogens, respiratory inorganics, global warming, and non-renewable energy categories. In both scenarios, the technologies significantly contribute to the potential impacts of non-carcinogens, respiratory inorganics, terrestrial ecotoxicity, global warming, and non-renewable energy. The influence of the technologies on the way other categories affect the environment was negligible. Improved efficiency in electricity consumption, decreased transport distance from raw material buyers to suppliers, and change in the end-life treatment of solid waste from landfill to incineration are the key factors in reducing the overall environmental impact.

[1]  WU Yan-xiang.  Environmental benefit of electricity generated by natural gas , 2009 .

[2]  Tapas K. Das,et al.  Evaluating chemical-, mechanical-, and bio-pulping processes and their sustainability characterization using life cycle assessment , 2004 .

[3]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. , 2010, Waste management.

[4]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database , 2006 .

[5]  Sara González-García,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of total chlorine free pulp from Eucalyptus globulus in Spain , 2009 .

[6]  B. Sudhakara Reddy,et al.  Understanding industrial energy use - Physical energy intensity changes in Indian manufacturing sector , 2011 .

[7]  Ana Cláudia Dias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of printing and writing paper produced in Portugal , 2007 .

[8]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[10]  M. Avraamides,et al.  Resource consumption and emissions from olive oil production: a life cycle inventory case study in Cyprus , 2008 .

[11]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Paper and biomass for energy?: The impact of paper recycling on energy and CO2 emissions , 2010 .

[12]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Implications of choices and interpretation in LCA for multi-criteria process design: de-inked pulp capacity and cogeneration at a paper mill case study , 2009 .

[14]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of coated white board: a case study in China , 2011 .

[15]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[16]  Ryoichi Yamamoto,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Woodfree Papers Containing Nonwood Pulp or Deinked Pulp , 2003 .

[17]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Analytical uncertainty propagation in life cycle inventory and impact assessment: application to an automobile front panel , 2010 .

[18]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Life cycle energy and GHG emissions of PET recycling: change-oriented effects , 2011 .