Impact of introducing flexibility in the Colombian transmission expansion planning

Abstract Power transmission expansion planning (TEP) is a process affected by uncertainty that requires a long-term vision to anticipate requirements of interconnections among generators and load centers. Flexibility is an alternative to cope with uncertainty that increases social welfare. This article seeks for estimating the value of this flexibility and interpreting its meaning in the Colombian power system. In order to keep this focus clear, we implement a well-known methodology of Real Options (RO) in a simplified version of the Colombian power system. Accordingly, we introduce flexibility using a simple strategy of adding new transmission lines and make a simple comparison with a robust approach, as the one currently used in Colombia. Our results show that introducing this flexibility in the Colombian TEP increases social welfare in around $35 million, which represents an upper bound for the additional investment costs incurred to provide this adapting ability to the power system. These results suggest the need for revising the current paradigm of robust approach to prepare future Colombian transmission plans.

[1]  G. Strbac,et al.  Valuation of Flexible Transmission Investment Options Under Uncertainty , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Reliable Renewable Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning: Co-Optimizing System's Resources for Meeting Renewable Targets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  M. Sauma,et al.  Comparison of Incentive Policies for Renewable Energy in an Oligopolistic Market with Price-Responsive Demand , 2016 .

[4]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  If you build it, he will come: Anticipative power transmission planning , 2013 .

[5]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Transmission Capacity between Norway and Germany - a Real Options Analysis , 2011 .

[6]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Impact of high wind power penetration on transmission network expansion planning , 2012 .

[7]  J. W. Feltes,et al.  Deregulation, privatization, and competition: transmission planning under uncertainty , 1999 .

[8]  C. Rehtanz,et al.  Real option valuation of FACTS investments based on the least square Monte Carlo method , 2011, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[9]  F. Black,et al.  The Valuation of Option Contracts and a Test of Market Efficiency , 1972 .

[10]  P. Tufano,et al.  A real-world way to manage real options. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[11]  C. Rehtanz,et al.  Flexible investment decisions in the European interconnected transmission system , 2011 .

[12]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Approximations in power transmission planning: implications for the cost and performance of renewable portfolio standards , 2013 .

[13]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Flexible Transmission Expansion Planning With Uncertainties in an Electricity Market , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Goran Strbac,et al.  An objective-based scenario selection method for transmission network expansion planning with multivariate stochasticity in load and renewable energy sources , 2018 .

[15]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Optimizing Your Options: Extracting the Full Economic Value of Transmission When Planning Under Uncertainty , 2015 .

[16]  Jonathan L. Ho,et al.  An Engineering-Economic Approach to Transmission Planning Under Market and Regulatory Uncertainties: WECC Case Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[18]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Next Generation Transmission Expansion Planning Framework: Models, Tools, and Educational Opportunities , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[20]  Clinton J. Andrews Evaluating risk management strategies in resource planning , 1995 .

[21]  Feng Gao,et al.  Overview of transmission expansion planning using real options analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  What is the value of the option to defer an investment in Transmission Expansion Planning? An estimation using Real Options , 2017 .

[23]  Glenn Boyle,et al.  Real Options and Transmission Investment: the New Zealand Grid Investment Test , 2006 .

[24]  Maria João Martins Santos,et al.  Development of a methodology to incorporate risk and uncertainty in electricity power planning , 2016 .

[25]  Prasad Kodukula,et al.  Project Valuation Using Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2006 .

[26]  Majid Oloomi Buygi,et al.  A Scenario-Based Multi-Objective Model for Multi-Stage Transmission Expansion Planning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[28]  Sara Lumbreras,et al.  Optimal transmission network expansion planning in real-sized power systems with high renewable penetration , 2017 .

[29]  B. Ramanathan,et al.  Analysis of Transmission Investments using Real Options , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[30]  R. Pringles,et al.  Real option valuation of power transmission investments by stochastic simulation , 2015 .

[31]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  The economic effects of interregional trading of renewable energy certificates in the WECC. , 2016 .

[32]  Francis A. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach , 2001 .

[33]  G. Latorre,et al.  Classification of publications and models on transmission expansion planning , 2003 .

[34]  Paulo Pereira,et al.  Capacity expansion in transmission networks using portfolios of real options , 2015 .

[35]  B. Hobbs,et al.  The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: Using two-stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty , 2012 .

[36]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[37]  Sara Lumbreras,et al.  The new challenges to transmission expansion planning. Survey of recent practice and literature review , 2016 .