On the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its effects on lifelines

Abstract The effect of the spatial variability-incoherence and apparent propagation of the seismic ground motions on the response of buried and above-ground lifelines is analysed. Simulations based on the most commonly used spatial variability models are generated and the correspondence between the characteristics of the models and those of the space-time simulations is identified. The correlation between the degree of exponential decay in the incoherence of the motions and the response of the structures is determined. It is shown that seismic ground motions that are partially correlated at low frequencies induce the highest quasistatic internal forces in lifelines, whereas motions with slowly decaying incoherence produce the highest contribution to the dynamic response. The significance of the incoherence and the apparent propagation of the motions on the response of the structures is also examined. The apparent propagation of the motions affects the response considerably at low apparent propagation velocities. For higher values of the velocity and for seismic motions that exhibit loss of coherence, the apparent propagation of the motions produces a lower-order effect compared to that of their incoherence for the structures analysed. The most important effect of the spatial incoherence is the introduction of significant quasistatic internal forces in the structures.

[1]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[2]  H. L. Wong,et al.  Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion , 1986 .

[3]  A. Zerva Pipeline response to directionally and spatially correlated seismic ground motions , 1993 .

[4]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Stochastic Fields and their Digital Simulation , 1987 .

[5]  M. Novak,et al.  Simulation of Spatially Incoherent Random Ground Motions , 1993 .

[6]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Design Criteria for Transportation Structures , 1991 .

[7]  C. K. Saikia,et al.  Site-Specific Estimation of Spatial Incoherence of Strong Ground Motion , 1988 .

[8]  Weijun Wang,et al.  Response of indeterminate two-span beam to spatially varying seismic excitation , 1990 .

[9]  Kiyoshi Kanai,et al.  Semi-empirical Formula for the Seismic Characteristics of the Ground , 1957 .

[10]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Spatial variation and stochastic modelling of seismic differential ground movement , 1988 .

[11]  Pol D. Spanos,et al.  Simulation of homogeneous two-dimensional random fields: Part II-MA and ARMA models , 1992 .

[12]  R. Harichandran Estimating the spatial variation of earthquake ground motion from dense array recordings , 1991 .

[13]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Stochastic Seismic Response Sensitivity of Lifeline Systems , 1990 .

[14]  Norman A. Abrahamson,et al.  The SMART I Accelerograph Array (1980-1987): A Review , 1987 .

[15]  W. Menke,et al.  Polarization and coherence of 5 to 30 Hz seismic wave fields at a hard-rock site and their relevance to velocity heterogeneities in the crust , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[17]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Stochastic Wave Representation of Seismic Ground Motion. II: Simulation , 1990 .

[18]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Analysis of the spatial variation of seismic waves and ground movements from smart‐1 array data , 1985 .

[19]  Mircea Grigoriu,et al.  SIMULATION OF NONSTATIONARY GAUSSIAN PROCESSES BY RANDOM TRIGONOMETRIC POLYNOMIALS , 1993 .

[20]  Aspasia Zerva,et al.  Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions , 1990 .

[21]  Chin-Hsiung Loh,et al.  Directionality and simulation in spatial variation of seismic waves , 1990 .

[22]  Yu Tang,et al.  Deterministic Assessment of Effects of Ground‐Motion Incoherence , 1990 .

[23]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Stochastic wave representation of seismic ground motion. I, F-K spectra , 1990 .

[24]  John E. Goldberg,et al.  The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures , 1965 .

[25]  Aspasia Zerva,et al.  Seismic ground motion simulations from a class of spatial variability models , 1992 .

[26]  J. Penzien,et al.  Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on smart-1 array data , 1989 .

[27]  Aspasia Zerva,et al.  Spatial incoherence effects on seismic ground strains , 1992 .

[28]  G. Fenton,et al.  Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision , 1990 .

[29]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Simulation of Multivariate Random Processes: Hybrid DFT and Digital Filtering Approach , 1993 .

[30]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Response spectrum method for multi‐support seismic excitations , 1992 .

[31]  J. Luco,et al.  Response of circular foundation to spatially random ground motion , 1987 .

[32]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Development of differential response spectra for lifeline seismic analysis , 1986 .

[33]  Weijun Wang,et al.  RESPONSE OF SIMPLE BEAM TO SPATIALLY VARYING EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION , 1988 .

[34]  Ahmet S. Cakmak,et al.  Time series modelling of strong ground motion from multiple event earthquakes , 1991 .

[35]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Engineering analyses of smart 1 array accelerograms , 1982 .

[36]  A. Ang,et al.  Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions , 1988 .

[37]  E. Vanmarcke,et al.  Stochastic Variation of Earthquake Ground Motion in Space and Time , 1986 .

[38]  H. Tajimi,et al.  Statistical Method of Determining the Maximum Response of Building Structure During an Earthquake , 1960 .

[39]  Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al.  Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. , 1985 .

[40]  M. Novak,et al.  Pipeline Response to Random Ground Motion , 1980 .