Knowledge Development Approaches and Breakthrough Innovations in Technology-Based New Firms

Compared to large established firms, technology-based new firms (TBNF) seem well placed to produce breakthrough innovations although questions remain as to their adeptness at subsequent exploitation. Building on the innovation and strategy literatures, the study identifies two different knowledge development approaches or modes (business models) in TBNFs – internal versus external - and examines their relation to breakthrough innovation and subsequent progression of the product to market. The internal mode assembles knowledge inside the firm to generate its innovations, whereas the external mode relies heavily on alliances to develop and assemble knowledge among firms embedded in a creative network. The study uses a unique panel dataset of 69 UK new biotechnology firms over an 11-year period to explore this issue empirically. The findings show that the external knowledge development mode is associated with more breakthrough innovations and a faster movement of innovations to market. The externally focused mode is not impeded by its relative lack of internal knowledge; it uses partners to access, assemble and develop a wide scope of knowledge in a flexible manner. In addition, partners provide deep domain expertise to undertake the requisite deep-dives. In contrast, the internal mode has the huge challenge of assembling knowledge resources internally and suffers from a quicker onset of path dependence that impedes the generation of breakthroughs. This study provides a choice of business models (internal or external) that is associated with different breakthrough and speed to market performance outcomes. Going forward, policy makers and managers seeking breakthrough innovations and speedy progression of the innovations to market should consider the potential resource efficiency of the external mode and the vital role played by collaborations – small firm versus large firm and private versus public entities.

[1]  Mathias Thoenig,et al.  On the Relation between Organisational Practices and New Technologies: The Role of (Time-Based) Competition , 2006 .

[2]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES FROM CORE TO PERIPHERY AND BACK: A STUDY ON THE DELIBERATE SHAPING OF KNOWLEDGE FLOWS IN INTERFIRM DYADS AND NETWORKS , 2021 .

[3]  J. Ayers.  Discovery‐Driven Planning , 2015 .

[4]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners , 1995 .

[5]  Andrea Prencipe,et al.  Technological competencies and product's evolutionary dynamics a case study from the aero-engine industry , 1997 .

[6]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Variability in organisational forms of biotechnology firms , 2005 .

[7]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? , 2002 .

[8]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[9]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Business models as models , 2010 .

[10]  M. Hopkins,et al.  Science, the State and the City: Britain's Struggle to Succeed in Biotechnology , 2016 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[12]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[13]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance , 2005 .

[14]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[15]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing , 2010 .

[16]  W. Lazonick,et al.  US Biopharmaceutical Finance and the Sustainability of the Biotech Business Model , 2011 .

[17]  J. Chakma,et al.  Is it virtuous to be virtual? The VC viewpoint , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[19]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[20]  Pankaj Ghemawat,et al.  Commitment versus Flexibility? , 1998 .

[21]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[22]  Nicolai Juul Foss,et al.  Introduction: New Organizational Forms Critical Perspectives , 2002 .

[23]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[24]  J. Magretta.  Why business models matter. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[25]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[26]  유영제,et al.  Biotechnology에서 배우는 교훈 , 2006 .

[27]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective , 2010 .

[28]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[29]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Knowledge integration using product R&D outsourcing in biotechnology , 2016 .

[30]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  The Influence of Technological Knowledge Base and Organizational Structure on Technology Collaboration , 2010 .

[31]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[32]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context , 2011 .

[33]  V. Mangematin,et al.  Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: the case of biotechnology in France , 2003 .

[34]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Business Models and Technological Innovation , 2013 .

[35]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[36]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[37]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure , 1999 .

[38]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence From the Field , 2011 .

[39]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms , 2012 .

[40]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Organizational Modes of Strategic Technology Partnering: International and Sectoral Differences , 1996 .

[41]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[42]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation: The Double-Edged Sword of Recombination , 2015 .

[43]  S. Zahra,et al.  A Capabilities Perspective on the Effects of Early Internationalization on Firm Survival and Growth , 2006 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[45]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[46]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance , 2005 .

[47]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[48]  B. Cassiman,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: R&D Projects, Activities and Partners , 2006 .

[49]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships , 2008 .

[50]  David B. Kletter,et al.  Shrinking Core, Expanding Periphery: The Relational Architecture of High-Performing Organizations , 2005 .

[51]  R. Merges,et al.  The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology Industry , 2003 .

[52]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Patterns of Modularization: The Dynamics of Product Architecture in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[53]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[54]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation , 2013 .

[55]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them , 2010 .

[56]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[57]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[58]  Sofy Carayannopoulos,et al.  External knowledge sourcing in biotechnology through acquisition versus alliance: A KBV approach , 2010 .

[59]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences , 2001 .

[60]  Paula E. Stephan.  How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[61]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Heterogeneous Firm‐Level Effects of Knowledge Exchanges on Product Innovation: Differences between Dynamic and Lagging Product Innovators* , 2010 .

[62]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Finding the Path to Success – The Structure and Strategies of British and German Biotechnology Companies. AGBO Report, LMU München , 2007 .

[63]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[64]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Designing Your Future Business Model: An Activity System Perspective , 2009 .

[65]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[66]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[67]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[68]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures , 2004 .

[69]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[70]  Sofy Carayannopoulos,et al.  How Technology–Based New Firms Leverage Newness and Smallness to Commercialize Disruptive Technologies , 2009 .

[71]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[72]  R. Weisberg.  Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[73]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  A Bird in the Hand or Two in the Bush?: Integration Trade-offs in Technology-grafting Acquisitions , 2003 .

[74]  R. Gonzalez.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[75]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[76]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[77]  F. Pammolli,et al.  The productivity crisis in pharmaceutical R&D , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[78]  Raffaele Conti,et al.  Learning to Be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[79]  R. Amit,et al.  Value creation in E‐business , 2001 .

[80]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[81]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[82]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Estimating Panel Data Models in the Presence of Endogeneity and Selection , 2010 .

[83]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[84]  R. Henderson.  Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[85]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[86]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[87]  G. Pisano.  Can science be a business? Lessons from biotech. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[88]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[89]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance , 2010 .

[90]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[91]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .