Clinical monitoring using otoacoustic emissions.

Damaging influences to the cochlea are a leading cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Examples include acute or chronic noise exposure and cochleotoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides. Typically, once damage has occurred, the cochlea cannot recover. Therefore, prevention is critical. If damaging influences cannot be avoided, then secondary prevention or early detection of cochlear hearing loss becomes important. Ideally, methods for the detection of cochlear damage should be as specific and as sensitive as possible. Otoacoustic emissions satisfy these criteria and offer a means of testing aspects of cochlear function in a non-invasive and objective way. Evoked otoacoustic emissions measured either after transient stimuli or during two-tone stimulation (distortion-product otoacoustic emissions) are the types most commonly used for clinical purposes. They are stable over time within individual ears and their repeatability has been established under conditions of clinical testing using commercial equipment. Thus, they are well suited as an effective means of monitoring subtle changes in cochlear status. The possibility of making non-invasive repeated measures of cochlear function has led to the widespread use of otoacoustic emissions in animal experiments. Influences of development, anoxia, anaesthesia, noise, and drugs have been monitored. Preliminary studies in humans demonstrate that cochlear damage due to ototoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides or cisplatin and due to noise exposure can be detected using otoacoustic emissions. Comparison of such results to those available using pure-tone audiometry indicates a greater sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions for detecting early cochlear damage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P Avan,et al.  Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  J. Mott,et al.  Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation , 1989, Hearing Research.

[5]  D O Kim,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. , 1990, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[6]  W. Mann,et al.  [Changes in transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5FU]. , 1992, HNO.

[7]  R. Probst,et al.  A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[8]  P. Plinkert,et al.  Früherkennung einer Cisplatin-Ototoxizität durch evozierte otoakustische Emissionen , 1991 .

[9]  G. Long,et al.  Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Hauser,et al.  Influence of General Anesthesia on Transiently Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Humans , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[12]  P. Avan,et al.  Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions , 1991, Hearing Research.

[13]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[14]  E. Rubel,et al.  Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code , 1991, Hearing Research.

[15]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for the influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D McFadden,et al.  Partial dissociation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and distortion products during aspirin use in humans. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  H. Welkoborsky,et al.  Veränderungen transitorisch evozierter otoakustischer Emissionen unter Chemotherapie mit Cisplatin und 5FU , 1992 .

[18]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Relevance of Animal Models to the Clinical Application of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1992 .

[19]  R. Hauser,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired ears. , 1990, American journal of otolaryngology.

[20]  The feasibility of using oto-acoustic emissions to monitor cochlear function during acoustic neuroma surgery. , 1992, Scandinavian audiology.

[21]  A. Forge,et al.  Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment , 1989, Hearing Research.

[22]  D. McFadden,et al.  Aspirin abolishes spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Rudolf Probst,et al.  Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. , 1993, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[24]  R. Probst,et al.  Repeatability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[25]  F Grandori,et al.  Long term stability, influence of the head position and modelling considerations for evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[26]  E. Berninger,et al.  The effect of quinine on psychoacoustic tuning curves, stapedius reflexes and evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy volunteers. , 1991, Scandinavian audiology.

[27]  R Probst,et al.  Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[28]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[30]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[31]  R Probst,et al.  Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, Acta oto-laryngologica.