Speech vs. reading comprehension: an explorative study of gender representations in Norwegian

ABSTRACT As research on the construction of a mental representation of referent gender in speech comprehension is scarce, this study examined whether factors identified in reading comprehension exert similar influence in speech comprehension. Conceptually replicating previous research, a sentence continuation evaluation task was set up in two modalities, as a listening task and as a time-confined reading task (i.e. to correspond to the time constraint when listening). In line with previous findings from self-paced reading paradigms we found gender representations in language comprehension to be grounded in the interaction between textual (grammatical) and background (stereotypical) information. Extending previous research, the effect of stereotypical information was however modulated by presentation modality. In all, although speech and reading comprehension share higher-level processes of comprehension, this study provides first evidence that differences in comprehension might occur due to differences such as orthographic access or attention allocation.

[1]  Dagmar Stahlberg,et al.  Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen , 2001 .

[2]  R. Baayen,et al.  Analyzing Reaction Times , 2010 .

[3]  Sieghard Beller,et al.  Culture or language: what drives effects of grammatical gender? , 2015 .

[4]  A. Garnham,et al.  Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men , 2008 .

[5]  M. Just,et al.  Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. , 2009, Psychology & neuroscience.

[6]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  The mental models theory language of comprehension , 1996 .

[7]  S. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending Pronouns: A Role for Word-Specific Gender Stereotype Information , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Susan A Duffy,et al.  Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[9]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  S. Reder.  On-line monitoring of eye-position signals in contingent and noncontingent paradigms , 1973 .

[11]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Are inferences from stereotyped role names to characters’ gender made elaboratively? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[12]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Pronoun resolution in Italian: The role of grammatical gender and context , 2011 .

[13]  Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway. , 2008, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[14]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Irmen.  What’s in a (Role) Name? Formal and Conceptual Aspects of Comprehending Personal Nouns , 2007, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  C. Madden,et al.  Reading between the lines: The activation of background knowledge during text comprehension , 2009 .

[17]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiology of subject-verb agreement mediated by speakers’ gender , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[18]  A. Garnham,et al.  Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Activating gender stereotypes during online spoken language processing: evidence from Visual World Eye Tracking. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[20]  Elena Andonova.  Gender and Sex: The Experiential Basis of Grammar , 2013, CogSci.

[21]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[22]  A. Garnham,et al.  Gender Representation in Different Languages and Grammatical Marking on Pronouns: When Beauticians, Musicians, and Mechanics Remain Men , 2012 .

[23]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Automatic Stereotyping , 1996 .

[24]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[25]  K Cain,et al.  The Use of Stereotypical Gender Information in Constructing a Mental Model: Evidence from English and Spanish , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  Steven B. Most,et al.  Auditory Stroop reveals implicit gender associations in adults and children , 2007 .

[27]  A. Garnham,et al.  Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks , 2007, NeuroImage.

[29]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Speaker Sex Influences Processing of Grammatical Gender , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  Loizos Michael,et al.  Reading between the lines , 2009, Nature.

[31]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[32]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verbphrase Anaphors , 1990 .

[34]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[35]  James R. Booth,et al.  The Association of Rapid Temporal Perception With Orthographic and Phonological Processing in Children and Adults With Reading Impairment , 2000 .

[36]  Chiara Reali,et al.  Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution , 2014 .

[37]  P. Gygax,et al.  The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult , 2012 .

[38]  A. Garnham,et al.  Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[39]  Angèle Brunellière,et al.  The influence of sex information into spoken words: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study , 2016, Brain Research.

[40]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Talker's voice and gender stereotype in human auditory sentence processing – evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.