Re-imagining Education Policy and Practice in the Digital Era

New digital technologies are changing the nature and contexts of work in Canada. It is essential that education policy and practice acknowledge and respond to these changes. The impacts and implications of new and emerging technologies for work can be summarized within two paradigms: technology is replacing work through automation and digital Taylorism; and technology is changing communication, collaboration and knowledge creation. Derived from a SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis report, this article explores how nurturing uniquely human abilities by employing a threshold concept approach will help create education policy and practice that can better prepare students for the realities of the evolving knowledge-based creative economy. Highlighting the complexity and transdisciplinary nature of knowledge, The New Literacies Threshold Concepts in English Language Arts are presented as a curriculum heuristic that is well-suited to developing uniquely human abilities.

[1]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Editors' Preface , 2007, J. Semant..

[2]  G. Cousin.  Threshold Concepts: Old Wine in New Bottles or a New Form of Transactional Curriculum Inquiry? , 2008 .

[3]  D. Ashton,et al.  Education, Globalisation and the Future of the Knowledge Economy , 2008 .

[4]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. , 2008 .

[5]  Chris M. Anson,et al.  Teaching Writing Using Blogs, Wikis, and other Digital Tools , 2008 .

[6]  S. Cumella.  New Public Management and Public Services for People with an Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Implementation of "Valuing People" in England. , 2008 .

[7]  H. Harouni.  High School Research and Critical Literacy: Social Studies With and Despite Wikipedia , 2009 .

[8]  Sarah W. Beck.  Composition across secondary and post‐secondary contexts: cognitive, textual and social dimensions , 2009 .

[9]  F. Dochy,et al.  Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness , 2010 .

[10]  Dag Einar Thorsen.  THE NEOLIBERAL CHALLENGE. WHAT IS NEOLIBERALISM , 2010 .

[11]  Terrie Lynn Thompson.  Assembly required: self-employed workers' informal work-learning in online communities , 2010 .

[12]  Byeong-Young Cho,et al.  Classroom assessment of literacy , 2010 .

[13]  Jeffrey Barlow,et al.  From Blogs to Bombs. The Future of Digital Technologies in Education. , 2010 .

[14]  J. E. Clark.  The Digital Imperative: Making the Case for a 21st-Century Pedagogy , 2010 .

[15]  Allison B. Dymnicki,et al.  The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. , 2011, Child development.

[16]  D. Leu,et al.  The New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension: Expanding the Literacy and Learning Curriculum , 2011, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy.

[17]  R. Beach.  Uses of Digital Tools and Literacies in the English Language Arts Classroom. , 2012 .

[18]  H. Levin.  More than just test scores , 2012 .

[19]  Miika Marttunen,et al.  Working on Understanding During Collaborative Online Reading , 2012 .

[20]  Mary K. Sheard,et al.  Social-Emotional Learning Championing Freedom, Education and Development: A Vehicle for At-risk Students to Succeed , 2013 .

[21]  Trevor R. Dietrich,et al.  Digital Natives: Fifth-Grade Students' Authentic and Ritualistic Engagement with Technology. , 2014 .

[22]  Chaoyun Liang,et al.  Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio environment for high school students? , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Ben Williamson.  The Future of the Curriculum: School Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2013 .

[24]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century , 2013 .

[25]  S. Barradell,et al.  The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges , 2013 .

[26]  Kimble Byrd.  Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World , 2013 .

[27]  G. Hull,et al.  Cosmopolitan Literacies, Social Networks, and “Proper Distance”: Striving to Understand in a Global World , 2014 .

[28]  Deborah Finfgeld-Connett,et al.  Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews , 2014 .

[29]  Lewchuck Wayne,et al.  Precarious Employment and Social Outcomes , 2014 .

[30]  David Hubert,et al.  A Framework for General Education Assessment: Assessing Information Literacy and Quantitative Literacy with ePortfolios. , 2014 .

[31]  Christer Clerwall.  Enter the Robot Journalist , 2014 .

[32]  Alf Hornborg.  Technology as Fetish: Marx, Latour, and the Cultural Foundations of Capitalism , 2014 .

[33]  D. Veselá,et al.  Knowledge-based Economy vs. Creative Economy , 2014 .

[34]  Dong Yu,et al.  Deep Learning: Methods and Applications , 2014, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[35]  A. Dodge,et al.  Dominant Discourse, Educational Research, and the Hegemony of Test Scores: If You Only Have a Hammer, Every Problem Looks Like a Nail , 2015 .

[36]  D. Schonfeld,et al.  Cluster-randomized trial demonstrating impact on academic achievement of elementary social-emotional learning. , 2015, School psychology quarterly : the official journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[37]  Anne-Marie Greene,et al.  Crowdsourcing and Work: Individual Factors and Circumstances Influencing Employability , 2015 .

[38]  Vik Loveday.  Working-Class Participation, Middle-Class Aspiration? Value, Upward Mobility and Symbolic Indebtedness in Higher Education , 2015 .

[39]  C. Smith,et al.  Student A/R/Tographers creating cellphilms , 2016 .

[40]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  Human work in the robotic future , 2016 .

[41]  Jeremy Rifkin.  How the Third Industrial Revolution Will Create a Green Economy , 2016 .

[42]  C. Smith,et al.  A/R/TOGRAPHY AND TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY , 2017 .