Time Insensitivity for Protective Investments

Investments in protective measures involve an initial immediate cost in exchange for a stream of potential benefits accruing over time in the form of reduced expected losses. This paper describes two studies in which individuals were asked both to make choices and indicate the maximum amount they were willing to pay (WTP) for such protective measures. By varying the number of years that the measures provided protection, we observed four different decision strategies that individuals use to determine their maximum WTP. The findings from these experiments strongly suggest that most individuals do not take into account the added benefits of having a protective measure in place over a longer period of time when determining the likelihood of purchasing protection or the maximum price they are willing to pay. The behavior of a relatively small proportion of the subjects was consistent with a discounted utility model. Most subjects were either myopic in their behavior or did not change their maximum WTP as the time horizon changed. Despite the fact that most subjects were insensitive to time changes, they were generally willing to purchase the protective measures. Implications of these results for investment in risk mitigation measures are briefly explored.

[1]  Martin Ahlbrecht,et al.  An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk , 1997 .

[2]  Jeffrey A. Dubin.  Will Mandatory Conservation Promote Energy Efficiency in the Selection of Household Appliance Stocks? , 1986 .

[3]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables , 1979 .

[4]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[5]  Earthquake Insurance , 1939, Nature.

[6]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[7]  P. Samuelson.  A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[8]  D. A. Houston,et al.  Implicit Discount Rates and the Purchase of Untried, Energy-Saving Durable Goods , 1983 .

[9]  T. Koopmans.  Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience , 1960 .

[10]  W K Viscusi,et al.  Rates of Time Preference and Consumer Valuations of Automobile Safety and Fuel Efficiency , 1995, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[11]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Energy efficiency : perspectives on individual behavior , 1987 .

[12]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[13]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Rates of time preference and valuations of the duration of life , 1989 .

[14]  J. Baron,et al.  Cost of Public Goods Affects Willingness to Pay for Them , 1996 .

[15]  Elliott Mittler,et al.  Earthquake Insurance in California: Environmental Policy and Individual Decision-Making , 1991 .

[16]  Dermot Gately,et al.  Individual Discount Rates and the Purchase and Utilization of Energy-Using Durables: Comment , 1980 .

[17]  Michael J. Moore,et al.  Discounting environmental health risks: New evidence and policy implications , 1990 .

[18]  Peter H. M. P. Roelofsma,et al.  Anomalies in intertemporal choice , 1996 .