Cryo-EM studies of microtubule structural intermediates and kinetochore-microtubule interactions.

The existence of structural intermediates in the processes of microtubule assembly and disassembly, and their relationship with the nucleotide state of tubulin, have been the subject of significant study and recent controversy. The first part of this chapter describes experiments and methods designed to characterize, using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and image analysis, the structure of stabilized tubulin assemblies that we propose mimic the growth and shortening states at microtubule ends. We further put forward the idea that these intermediates have important biological functions, especially during cellular processes where the dynamic character of microtubules is essential. One such process is the attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores in eukaryotic cell division. The second part of this chapter is consequently dedicated to studies of the yeast Dam 1 kinetochore complex and its interaction with microtubules. This complex is essential for accurate chromosome segregation and is an important target of the Aurora B spindle check-point kinase. The Dam 1 complex self-assembles in a microtubule-dependent manner into rings and spirals. The rings are able to track microtubule-depolymerizing ends against a load and in a highly processive manner, an essential property for their function in vivo. We describe the experimental in vitro protocols to produce biologically relevant self-assembled structures of Dam 1 around microtubules and their structural characterization by cryo-EM.

[1]  D. Drubin,et al.  Dad1p, third component of the Duo1p/Dam1p complex involved in kinetochore function and mitotic spindle integrity. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  D. Drubin,et al.  Mitotic Spindle Integrity and Kinetochore Function Linked by the Duo1p/Dam1p Complex , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[3]  D. Agard,et al.  The lattice as allosteric effector: Structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  R. Buey,et al.  The nucleotide switch of tubulin and microtubule assembly: a polymerization-driven structural change. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[5]  J. Frank,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction with contrast transfer function correction from energy-filtered cryoelectron micrographs: procedure and application to the 70S Escherichia coli ribosome. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubules: A Ring for the Depolymerization Motor , 2005, Current Biology.

[7]  J. McIntosh,et al.  A molecular-mechanical model of the microtubule. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[8]  John R. Yates,et al.  Phospho-Regulation of Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments by the Aurora Kinase Ipl1p , 2002, Cell.

[9]  E. Nogales,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent bending flexibility of tubulin regulates microtubule assembly , 2005, Nature.

[10]  William V Nicholson,et al.  Microtubule structure at 8 A resolution. , 2002, Structure.

[11]  K. Böhm,et al.  Structural diversity and dynamics of microtubules and polymorphic tubulin assemblies. , 1990, Electron microscopy reviews.

[12]  Stefan Westermann,et al.  Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[14]  K. Downing,et al.  Structural basis for the interaction of tubulin with proteins and drugs that affect microtubule dynamics. , 2000, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[15]  E. Nogales,et al.  Architecture of the Dam1 kinetochore ring complex and implications for microtubule-driven assembly and force-coupling mechanisms , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  P. Sorger,et al.  The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[18]  R. King,et al.  When 2+2=5: the origins and fates of aneuploid and tetraploid cells. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  J P Schroeter,et al.  SUPRIM: easily modified image processing software. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  Stanley Fields,et al.  Kinetochore protein interactions and their regulation by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  P. Curmi,et al.  The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex , 2000, Cell.

[22]  T. Davis,et al.  Phosphoregulation and depolymerization-driven movement of the Dam1 complex do not require ring formation , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  Stefan Westermann,et al.  The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends , 2006, Nature.

[24]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro , 1988, Nature.

[25]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  GDP state of tubulin: stabilization of double rings. , 1986, Biochemistry.

[26]  Anthony A. Hyman,et al.  Structural changes at microtubule ends accompanying GTP hydrolysis: Information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue of GTP, guanylyl (α,β)methylenediphosphonate , 1998 .

[27]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[28]  A. Klug,et al.  Three-dimensional image reconstructions of the contractile tail of T4 bacteriophage. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  K. Hirose,et al.  The structure of microtubule-motor complexes. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[30]  J. Correia,et al.  Subtilisin cleavage of tubulin heterodimers and polymers. , 1992, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[31]  Stéphanie Portet,et al.  Anisotropic elastic properties of microtubules , 2005, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[32]  J. Yates,et al.  Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  M. Caplow,et al.  The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1995 Apr;129(2):549] , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Gordon W. Slysz,et al.  Structural mass spectrometry of the alpha beta-tubulin dimer supports a revised model of microtubule assembly. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[35]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Stages of tubulin assembly and disassembly studied by time-resolved synchrotron X-ray scattering. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[37]  M. Steinmetz,et al.  Structural basis for the regulation of tubulin by vinblastine , 2005, Nature.

[38]  Trisha N Davis,et al.  The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  E. Nogales,et al.  Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[40]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo- electron microscopy study , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin rings: which way do they curve? , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Magnesium-induced self-association of calf brain tubulin. I. Stoichiometry. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[43]  S. Fuller,et al.  Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  E. Nogales,et al.  Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  E. Nogales,et al.  Ab initio reconstruction of helical samples with heterogeneity, disorder and coexisting symmetries. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[46]  E. Nogales,et al.  Structural intermediates in microtubule assembly and disassembly: how and why? , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[47]  R A Milligan,et al.  Helical processing using PHOELIX. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[48]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Force production by disassembling microtubules , 2005, Nature.

[49]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[50]  M. Carlier,et al.  Hydrolysis of GTP associated with the formation of tubulin oligomers is involved in microtubule nucleation. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Jordan Ma,et al.  Mechanism of action of antitumor drugs that interact with microtubules and tubulin. , 2012 .

[52]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Variability‐based sequence alignment identifies residues responsible for functional differences in α and β tubulin , 2004 .

[53]  E. Nogales,et al.  An iterative Fourier-Bessel algorithm for reconstruction of helical structures with severe Bessel overlap. , 2005, Journal of Structural Biology.

[54]  D. DeRosier,et al.  Averaging data derived from images of helical structures with different symmetries. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  Straight GDP-Tubulin Protofilaments Form in the Presence of Taxol , 2007, Current Biology.

[56]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Cold depolymerization of microtubules to double rings: geometric stabilization of assemblies. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[57]  E. Nogales Structural insights into microtubule function. , 2000, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  T. Giddings,et al.  Yeast Dam1p is required to maintain spindle integrity during mitosis and interacts with the Mps1p kinase. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[59]  Henrik Flyvbjerg,et al.  Structural microtubule cap: stability, catastrophe, rescue, and third state. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[60]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Different assemblies of the DAM1 complex follow shortening microtubules by distinct mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  E. Schiebel,et al.  Four new subunits of the Dam1–Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[62]  H. Kueh,et al.  Structural Plasticity in Actin and Tubulin Polymer Dynamics , 2009, Science.

[63]  D. Agard,et al.  Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human gamma-tubulin. , 2005, Nature.

[64]  M. Jordan,et al.  Mechanism of action of antitumor drugs that interact with microtubules and tubulin. , 2002, Current medicinal chemistry. Anti-cancer agents.

[65]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Mechanism of colchicine binding to tubulin. Tolerance of substituents in ring C' of biphenyl analogues. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[66]  Patrick A. Curmi,et al.  Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain , 2004, Nature.

[67]  A. Desai,et al.  Molecular architecture of the kinetochore–microtubule interface , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[68]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[69]  D. Drubin,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Duo1p and Dam1p, Novel Proteins Involved in Mitotic Spindle Function , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[70]  J. Wolff Promotion of microtubule assembly by oligocations: cooperativity between charged groups. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[71]  E. Egelman A robust algorithm for the reconstruction of helical filaments using single-particle methods. , 2000, Ultramicroscopy.

[72]  D. Agard,et al.  Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human γ-tubulin , 2005, Nature.

[73]  D. Odde,et al.  Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[74]  E. Nogales,et al.  Tubulin and FtsZ form a distinct family of GTPases , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[75]  E. Mandelkow Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo- electron microscopy study , 1991, Journal of Cell Biology.

[76]  R A Milligan,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of ncd-decorated microtubules obtained by a back-projection method. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[77]  R. Wade,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of functional motor proteins on microtubules , 1996, Current Biology.

[78]  W Chiu,et al.  CTF determination of images of ice-embedded single particles using a graphics interface. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[79]  N. Unwin,et al.  Contrast transfer for frozen-hydrated specimens: determination from pairs of defocused images. , 1988, Ultramicroscopy.

[80]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Situs: A package for docking crystal structures into low-resolution maps from electron microscopy. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[81]  Clarence S. M. Chan,et al.  Functional cooperation of Dam1, Ipl1, and the inner centromere protein (INCENP)–related protein Sli15 during chromosome segregation , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.