The Potential for Bone Loss in Acetabular Structures Following THA

Attempts to preserve periacetabular bone stock following total hip replacement have largely ignored the potential for stress shielding in the acetabulum. We sought to quantify the change in stress distribution in acetabular bone with components of varying material stiffness by developing a high-resolution 3-D finite element model from CT scans of a young female donor. Periprosthetic bone stresses and strains on the left pelvis were compared with hemispherical cups of various material properties and with a horseshoe shaped polymeric design described in the recent literature. We observed unphysiologic periacetabular bone stress and strain fields for all designs tested. For hemispherical components, reduction of the acetabular shell material modulus caused modest changes in bone stress compared to the changes in implant geometry. The horseshoe shaped cup more effectively loaded the acetabular structures than the hemispherical design. Our results suggest stress and strain fields in pelvic structures after introduction of hemispherical acetabular components predict inevitable bone adaptation that cannot be resolved by changes in implant material properties alone. Radical changes in implant design may be necessary for long term maintenance of supporting structures in the reconstructed acetabulum.

[1]  N. Rushton,et al.  Five-year clinical, radiological and postmortem results of the Cambridge Cup in patients with displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  W. Capello,et al.  Alumina Ceramic Bearings for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Five-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  S. Röhrl,et al.  In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups a radiostereometry analysis study. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  S. Mendenhall Hip and knee implant prices increase 9%. , 2004, OR manager.

[7]  R. Brooks,et al.  Biological evaluation of carbon-fibre-reinforced polybutyleneterephthalate (CFRPBT) employed in a novel acetabular cup. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[8]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  W. Capello,et al.  Ten-Year Results withHydroxyapatite-Coated Total Hip Femoral Components in Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  W. Capello,et al.  Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, Orthopedics.

[11]  A. Edidin,et al.  A 10-year minimum follow-up of hydroxyapatite-coated threaded cups: clinical, radiographic and survivorship analyses with comparison to the literature. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  K. Widmer,et al.  Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  A. Edidin,et al.  A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  K. Tanner,et al.  Effects of acetabular resurfacing component material and fixation on the strain distribution in the pelvis , 2002, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  R.G.T. Geesink,et al.  Osteoconductive Coatings for Total Joint Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  R.G.T. Geesink,et al.  Hydroxyapatite Femoral Stems for Total Hip Arthroplasty: 10-to 13-Year Followup , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  C. Chadwick,et al.  The use of the Internet by orthopaedic outpatients. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  P. Pellicci,et al.  Bone Density Adjacent to Press-Fit Acetabular Components: A Prospective Analysis with Quantitative Computed Tomography , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  F Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative determination of joint incongruity and pressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  A. Edidin,et al.  Fixation of Acetabular Cups without Cement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Comparison of Three Different Implant Surfaces at a Minimum Duration of Follow-up of Five Years* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C. V. White,et al.  Backside nonconformity and locking restraints affect liner/shell load transfer mechanisms and relative motion in modular acetabular components for total hip replacement. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  J. Cohen The role of access of joint fluid to bone in periarticular osteolysis. A report of four cases. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  B Mjöberg,et al.  The theory of early loosening of hip prostheses. , 1997, Orthopedics.

[24]  R. Brand,et al.  Pelvic muscle and acetabular contact forces during gait. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  E. Morscher,et al.  Rationale of a Flexible Press Fit Cup in Total Hip Replacement; 5‐Year Followup in 280 Procedures , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Direct comparison of contact areas, contact stress and subchondral mineralization in human hip joint specimens , 1997, Anatomy and Embryology.

[27]  N. Sharkey,et al.  Statically equivalent load and support conditions produce different hip joint contact pressures and periacetabular strains. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  C. Engh,et al.  The Influence of Clinical Factors on Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  W. Kalender,et al.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[32]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Load transfer across the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Klaus Engelke,et al.  Universal standardization for dual X‐ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross‐calibration results , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  J. Galante,et al.  Histology of porous-coated acetabular components. 25 cementless cups retrieved after arthroplasty. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[36]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  W C Hutton,et al.  Contact pressures in the human hip joint. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[38]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A stress analysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  J. Tong,et al.  Failure of an uncemented acetabular prosthesis - a case study. , 2006, Engineering failure analysis.

[40]  Tony M. Keaveny,et al.  BONE MECHANICS , 2005 .

[41]  H. Hirschfelder,et al.  A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty , 2002, International Orthopaedics.

[42]  Aiguo Wang,et al.  Comparison of the properties of annealed crosslinked (Crossfire) and conventional polyethylene as hip bearing materials. , 2002, Bulletin (Hospital for Joint Diseases (New York, N.Y.)).

[43]  G. Macalino,et al.  Porous-coated total hip replacement. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[44]  T. Brown,et al.  Areas of contact and extent of gaps with implantation of oversized acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[45]  D. J. Rapperport,et al.  Contact finite element stress analysis of porous ingrowth acetabular cup implantation, ingrowth, and loosening , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[46]  H Oonishi,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint--by means of the three dimensional finite element method. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  D. Bartel,et al.  The effect of metal backing on stresses in polyethylene acetabular components. , 1983, The Hip.

[48]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  Analytical support for acetabular component metal backing. , 1983, The Hip.

[49]  D R Pedersen,et al.  An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.