Global climate response to idealized deforestation in CMIP6 models

Abstract. Changes in forest cover have a strong effect on climate through the alteration of surface biogeophysical and biogeochemical properties that affect energy, water and carbon exchange with the atmosphere. To quantify biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of deforestation in a consistent setup, nine Earth system models (ESMs) carried out an idealized experiment in the framework of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, phase 6 (CMIP6). Starting from their pre-industrial state, models linearly replace 20×106 km2 of forest area in densely forested regions with grasslands over a period of 50 years followed by a stabilization period of 30 years. Most of the deforested area is in the tropics, with a secondary peak in the boreal region. The effect on global annual near-surface temperature ranges from no significant change to a cooling by 0.55 ∘C, with a multi-model mean of -0.22±0.21 ∘C. Five models simulate a temperature increase over deforested land in the tropics and a cooling over deforested boreal land. In these models, the latitude at which the temperature response changes sign ranges from 11 to 43∘ N, with a multi-model mean of 23∘ N. A multi-ensemble analysis reveals that the detection of near-surface temperature changes even under such a strong deforestation scenario may take decades and thus longer than current policy horizons. The observed changes emerge first in the centre of deforestation in tropical regions and propagate edges, indicating the influence of non-local effects. The biogeochemical effect of deforestation are land carbon losses of 259±80 PgC that emerge already within the first decade. Based on the transient climate response to cumulative emissions (TCRE) this would yield a warming by 0.46 ± 0.22 ∘C, suggesting a net warming effect of deforestation. Lastly, this study introduces the “forest sensitivity” (as a measure of climate or carbon change per fraction or area of deforestation), which has the potential to provide lookup tables for deforestation–climate emulators in the absence of strong non-local climate feedbacks. While there is general agreement across models in their response to deforestation in terms of change in global temperatures and land carbon pools, the underlying changes in energy and carbon fluxes diverge substantially across models and geographical regions. Future analyses of the global deforestation experiments could further explore the effect on changes in seasonality of the climate response as well as large-scale circulation changes to advance our understanding and quantification of deforestation effects in the ESM frameworks.

[1]  Tian Tian,et al.  The EC-Earth3 Earth System Model for the Climate Model Intercomparison Project 6 , 2021 .

[2]  C. Delire,et al.  The Global Land Carbon Cycle Simulated With ISBA‐CTRIP: Improvements Over the Last Decade , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[3]  S. Bony,et al.  Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[4]  H. Douville,et al.  The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE‐Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[5]  H. Martins,et al.  Warmer climate projections in EC-Earth3-Veg: the role of changes in the greenhouse gas concentrations from CMIP5 to CMIP6 , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[6]  A. Ito,et al.  Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks , 2020, Geoscientific Model Development.

[7]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Harmonization of Global Land-Use Change and Management for the Period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6 , 2020 .

[8]  Jean-Philippe Proux,et al.  GENCI : Grand équipement national de calcul intensif , 2020, Bulletin 1024.

[9]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Implementation of the CMIP6 Forcing Data in the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Model , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[10]  W. G. Strand,et al.  The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[11]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  Reconciling the disagreement between observed and simulated temperature responses to deforestation , 2020, Nature Communications.

[12]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[13]  A. J. Hewitt,et al.  UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[14]  R. Waldman,et al.  Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[15]  Nathan Collier,et al.  The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[16]  J. von Hardenberg,et al.  On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6 , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[17]  Bo Qiu,et al.  Development of Land Surface Model BCC_AVIM2.0 and Its Preliminary Performance in LS3MIP/CMIP6 , 2019, Journal of Meteorological Research.

[18]  E. Robertson The Local Biophysical Response to Land-Use Change in HadGEM2-ES , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[19]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Emergence of Anthropogenic Signals in the Ocean Carbon Cycle , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[20]  N. Gillett,et al.  The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[21]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Different response of surface temperature and air temperature to deforestation in climate models , 2019, Earth System Dynamics.

[22]  A. Voldoire,et al.  Evaluation of an Online Grid‐Coarsening Algorithm in a Global Eddy‐Admitting Ocean Biogeochemical Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[23]  M. Lo,et al.  Thermodynamic and Dynamic Responses to Deforestation in the Maritime Continent: A Modeling Study , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[24]  Bertrand Decharme,et al.  Recent Changes in the ISBA‐CTRIP Land Surface System for Use in the CNRM‐CM6 Climate Model and in Global Off‐Line Hydrological Applications , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[25]  Alexander J. Winkler,et al.  Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO2 , 2019, Journal of advances in modeling earth systems.

[26]  S. Lewis,et al.  Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon , 2019, Nature.

[27]  A. Donohoe,et al.  Does Surface Temperature Respond to or Determine Downwelling Longwave Radiation? , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[28]  C. Reick,et al.  Nonlocal Effects Dominate the Global Mean Surface Temperature Response to the Biogeophysical Effects of Deforestation , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[29]  A. P. Williams,et al.  Global Emergence of Anthropogenic Climate Change in Fire Weather Indices , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[30]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2016 , 2016 .

[31]  G. Bonan,et al.  Separating the Impact of Individual Land Surface Properties on the Terrestrial Surface Energy Budget in both the Coupled and Uncoupled Land–Atmosphere System , 2018, Journal of Climate.

[32]  Xiaohong Liu,et al.  The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[33]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Different response of surface temperature and air temperature to deforestation in climate models , 2018 .

[34]  H. Hasumi,et al.  Impact of deep ocean mixing on the climatic mean state in the Southern Ocean , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[35]  P. Ciais,et al.  Increased water-use efficiency and reduced CO2 uptake by plants during droughts at a continental scale , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[36]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Modelled biophysical impacts of conservation agriculture on local climates , 2018, Global change biology.

[37]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[38]  A. Arneth,et al.  Biophysics and vegetation cover change: a process-based evaluation framework for confronting land surface models with satellite observations , 2018, Earth System Science Data.

[39]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Historical deforestation locally increased the intensity of hot days in northern mid-latitudes , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[40]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Biogeophysical Impacts of Land‐Use Change on Climate Extremes in Low‐Emission Scenarios: Results From HAPPI‐Land , 2018, Earth's future.

[41]  H. Haberl,et al.  Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass , 2017, Nature.

[42]  Gregory Duveiller,et al.  The mark of vegetation change on Earth’s surface energy balance , 2018, Nature Communications.

[43]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Implications of improved representations of plant respiration in a changing climate , 2017, Nature Communications.

[44]  Sophie Valcke,et al.  Development and performance of a new version of the OASIS coupler, OASIS3-MCT_3.0 , 2017 .

[45]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Carbon-nitrogen interactions in idealized simulations with JSBACH (version 3.10) , 2017 .

[46]  Kaiguang Zhao,et al.  Local temperature response to land cover and management change driven by non-radiative processes , 2017 .

[47]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Can climate‐effective land management reduce regional warming? , 2017 .

[48]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Role of Fire in the Global Land Water Budget during the Twentieth Century due to Changing Ecosystems , 2017 .

[49]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Present‐day irrigation mitigates heat extremes , 2017 .

[50]  Christian H. Reick,et al.  Robust Identification of Local Biogeophysical Effects of Land-Cover Change in a Global Climate Model , 2017 .

[51]  Matthew J. Smith,et al.  Transient dynamics of terrestrial carbon storage: mathematical foundation and its applications , 2017 .

[52]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Impact of fire on global land surface air temperature and energy budget for the 20th century due to changes within ecosystems , 2017 .

[53]  R. Lorenz,et al.  Scale dependence of the simulated impact of Amazonian deforestation on regional climate , 2016 .

[54]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6:rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[55]  P. Cox,et al.  Improved representation of plant functional types and physiology in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES v4.2) using plant trait information , 2016 .

[56]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Does Amazonian deforestation cause global effects; can we be sure? , 2016 .

[57]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover , 2016, Science.

[58]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[59]  Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré,et al.  The role of spatial scale and background climate in the latitudinal temperature response to deforestation , 2015 .

[60]  C. Bettigole,et al.  Mapping tree density at a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[61]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Strong dependence of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic land cover change on initial land cover and soil carbon parametrization , 2015 .

[62]  Pete Smith,et al.  How has soil carbon stock changed over recent decades? , 2015, Global change biology.

[63]  Nicole Van Lipzig,et al.  New insights in the capability of climate models to simulate the impact of LUC based on temperature decomposition of paired site observations , 2015 .

[64]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Exceptional twentieth-century slowdown in Atlantic Ocean overturning circulation , 2015 .

[65]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Modelling the response of yields and tissue C:N to changes in atmospheric CO2 and N management in the main wheat regions of western Europe , 2015 .

[66]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Global variability in leaf respiration in relation to climate, plant functional types and leaf traits. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[67]  Shuangcheng Li,et al.  Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations , 2015, Nature Communications.

[68]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[69]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Influence of Amazonian deforestation on the future evolution of regional surface fluxes, circulation, surface temperature and precipitation , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[70]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  From land use to land cover: restoring the afforestation signal in a coupled integrated assessment–earth system model and the implications for CMIP5 RCP simulations , 2014 .

[71]  Vassily Lyutsarev,et al.  Changing How Earth System Modeling is Done to Provide More Useful Information for Decision Making, Science, and Society , 2014 .

[72]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Global and regional effects of land-use change on climate in 21st century simulations with interactive carbon cycle , 2014 .

[73]  Kirsten Thonicke,et al.  SPITFIRE within the MPI Earth system model: Model development and evaluation , 2014 .

[74]  D. Nychka,et al.  The emerging anthropogenic signal in land–atmosphere carbon-cycle coupling , 2014 .

[75]  G. Asner,et al.  Warming-related increases in soil CO 2 efflux are explained by increased below-ground carbon flux , 2014 .

[76]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature , 2014 .

[77]  W. Thiery,et al.  The Regional Climate Impact of a Realistic Future Deforestation Scenario in the Congo Basin , 2014 .

[78]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies , 2014, The New phytologist.

[79]  Tobias Stacke,et al.  Impact of the soil hydrology scheme on simulated soil moisture memory , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[80]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model , 2013 .

[81]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[82]  Jonathan Seaquist,et al.  Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem carbon cycling in Africa , 2013 .

[83]  D. Medvigy,et al.  Simulated Changes in Northwest U.S. Climate in Response to Amazon Deforestation , 2013 .

[84]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies , 2013 .

[85]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Effect of Anthropogenic Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes on Climate and Land Carbon Storage in CMIP5 Projections for the Twenty-First Century , 2013 .

[86]  Myles R. Allen,et al.  Constraining the Ratio of Global Warming to Cumulative CO2 Emissions Using CMIP5 Simulations , 2013 .

[87]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[88]  P. Dirmeyer,et al.  Land use/cover change impacts in CMIP5 climate simulations: A new methodology and 21st century challenges , 2013 .

[89]  Li Zhang,et al.  Global carbon budgets simulated by the Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model for the last century , 2013 .

[90]  Lionel Jarlan,et al.  Impact of a satellite-derived leaf area index monthly climatology in a global numerical weather prediction model , 2013 .

[91]  C. Taylor,et al.  Observations of increased tropical rainfall preceded by air passage over forests , 2012, Nature.

[92]  Andrew J. Pitman,et al.  Attributing the impacts of land-cover changes in temperate regions on surface temperature and heat fluxes to specific causes: Results from the first LUCID set of simulations , 2012 .

[93]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Determining robust impacts of land-use induced land-cover changes on surface climate over North America and Eurasia; Results from the first set of LUCID experiments , 2012 .

[94]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Simulating the Biogeochemical and Biogeophysical Impacts of Transient Land Cover Change and Wood Harvest in the Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) from 1850 to 2100 , 2012 .

[95]  Motoko Inatomi,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency of the Terrestrial Biosphere: A Model Analysis Focusing on Interactions between the Global Carbon and Water Cycles , 2012 .

[96]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  Time of emergence of climate signals , 2012 .

[97]  Klaus Wyser,et al.  EC-Earth V2.2: description and validation of a new seamless earth system prediction model , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[98]  P. Cox,et al.  The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics , 2011 .

[99]  A. Don,et al.  Impact of tropical land‐use change on soil organic carbon stocks – a meta‐analysis , 2011 .

[100]  K. Denman,et al.  Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases , 2011 .

[101]  K. Denman,et al.  The global carbon cycle in the Canadian Earth system model (CanESM1): Preindustrial control simulation , 2010 .

[102]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Combined biogeophysical and biogeochemical effects of large-scale forest cover changes in the MPI earth system model , 2010 .

[103]  M. Hansen,et al.  Quantification of global gross forest cover loss , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[104]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical climate response to historical anthropogenic land cover change , 2010 .

[105]  Nathalie de Noblet-Ducoudré,et al.  Climatic Impact of Global-Scale Deforestation: Radiative versus Nonradiative Processes , 2010 .

[106]  C. Müller,et al.  Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results from the LUCID intercomparison study , 2009 .

[107]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate , 2009 .

[108]  Sylvain Bouillon,et al.  Simulating the mass balance and salinity of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice. 1. Model description and validation , 2009 .

[109]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium , 2008 .

[110]  S. Sitch,et al.  The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2008 .

[111]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[112]  K. Caldeira,et al.  Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[113]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Climate Dynamics (2006) DOI 10.1007/s00382-005-0092-6 , 2005 .

[114]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[115]  Kumiko Takata,et al.  Development of the minimal advanced treatments of surface interaction and runoff , 2003 .

[116]  X. Yin Responses of leaf nitrogen concentration and specific leaf area to atmospheric CO2 enrichment: a retrospective synthesis across 62 species , 2002 .

[117]  Michael Bruen,et al.  Impact of a physically based soil water flow and soil-plant interaction representation for modeling large-scale land surface processes , 2002 .

[118]  Akihiko Ito,et al.  A simulation model of the carbon cycle in land ecosystems (Sim-CYCLE) : A description based on dry-matter production theory and plot-scale validation , 2002 .

[119]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large‐scale land cover change , 2001 .

[120]  R. Betts Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo , 2000, Nature.

[121]  Hajime Okamoto,et al.  Global three‐dimensional simulation of aerosol optical thickness distribution of various origins , 2000 .

[122]  H. Hasumi,et al.  CCSR Ocean Component Model (COCO), version 2.1 , 2000 .

[123]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  CLIMBER-2: a climate system model of intermediate complexity. Part II: model sensitivity , 2001 .

[124]  Martin Körschens,et al.  Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using RothC-26.3 , 1997 .

[125]  Hans von Storch,et al.  Taking Serial Correlation into Account in Tests of the Mean. , 1995 .

[126]  W. Parton,et al.  Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model , 1988 .

[127]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Photosynthesis, CO2 and Plant Production , 1985 .