Temporal binding past the Libet clock: testing design factors for an auditory timer

Voluntary actions and causally linked sensory stimuli are perceived to be shifted towards each other in time. This so-called temporal binding is commonly assessed in paradigms using the Libet Clock. In such experiments, participants have to estimate the timing of actions performed or ensuing sensory stimuli (usually tones) by means of a rotating clock hand presented on a screen. The aforementioned task setup is however ill-suited for many conceivable setups, especially when they involve visual effects. To address this shortcoming, the line of research presented here establishes an alternative measure for temporal binding by using a sequence of timed sounds. This method uses an auditory timer, a sequence of letters presented during task execution, which serve as anchors for temporal judgments. In four experiments, we manipulated four design factors of this auditory timer, namely interval length, interval filling, sequence predictability, and sequence length, to determine the most effective and economic method for measuring temporal binding with an auditory timer.

[1]  W. Kunde,et al.  Connecting action control and agency: Does action-effect binding affect temporal binding? , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Intentional binding as Bayesian cue combination: Testing predictions with trait individual differences. , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Buehner,et al.  Causal Binding of Actions to Their Effects , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  Pushing the rules: effects and aftereffects of deliberate rule violations , 2016, Psychological research.

[5]  Arden Miller,et al.  The rotating spot method of timing subjective events , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[6]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  The time course of intentional binding , 2016, CogSci.

[7]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  A. Yamashita,et al.  The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[10]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  W. Kunde,et al.  Action-effect binding and agency , 2018, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  M. Buehner.  Understanding the Past, Predicting the Future , 2012, Psychological science.

[13]  M. Voss,et al.  The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Integrating prospective and retrospective cues to the sense of agency: a multi-study investigation† , 2017, Neuroscience of consciousness.

[16]  W. Kunde,et al.  Was it me? – Filling the interval between action and effects increases agency but not sensory attenuation , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[17]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Taro Toyoizumi,et al.  A Bayesian psychophysics model of sense of agency , 2019, Nature Communications.

[19]  W. Kunde,et al.  Something from nothing: Agency for deliberate nonactions , 2019, Cognition.

[20]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[21]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[22]  James W. Moore,et al.  What Is the Sense of Agency and Why Does it Matter? , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  Awareness of somatic events associated with a voluntary action , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Do Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Sense of Agency Measure the Same Thing? , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  D. Wegner.  The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Emma C Tecwyn,et al.  When causality shapes the experience of time: Evidence for temporal binding in young children. , 2018, Developmental science.

[27]  P. Haggard,et al.  Awareness of action: Inference and prediction , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  H. Kawabata,et al.  What Makes Action and Outcome Temporally Close to Each Other: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Temporal Binding , 2019, Timing & Time Perception.

[29]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[30]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983 .

[31]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Beyond the Libet Clock: Modality Variants for Agency Measurements , 2018, CHI.

[32]  W. Kunde,et al.  Action Effects Are Coded as Transitions From Current to Future Stimulation: Evidence From Compatibility Effects in Tracking , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Dopaminergic medication boosts action–effect binding in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  R. Pfister,et al.  The effects of action choice on temporal binding, agency ratings, and their correlation , 2019, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Agency, subjective time, and other minds. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: Cognitive and perceptual factors , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  P. Dixon.  Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs , 2008 .

[40]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Awareness of action in schizophrenia , 2003, Neuroreport.

[41]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The Experience of Agency , 2009 .

[42]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  The effects of freedom of choice in action selection on perceived mental effort and the sense of agency. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[43]  T. Carr,et al.  Taking credit for success: The phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  W. Kunde,et al.  Attracted by rewards: Disentangling the motivational influence of rewarding and punishing targets and distractors. , 2016 .

[45]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  Confidence intervals for two sample means: Calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[46]  Wladimir Kirsch,et al.  Intentional Binding Is Unrelated to Action Intention , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.