Directional localization in high ambient noise with and without the use of hearing protectors.

Personal hearing protective devices (HPDs) are becoming increasingly common in settings where levels of noise above 85 dB(A) represent a potential threat to hearing. Several previous studies have indicated that the use of such devices adversely affects the localization of sounds, but none of these experiments employed very precise measures of location discriminability. The major study in the present report examined just such fine discrimination, using a forced-choice task, and compared the effects of three different HPDS. Localization signals were 1.5 s bursts of noise (≥ 1 kHz). Both of the described experiments were conducted in acoustically complex, reverberant environments, to simulate real working conditions. Results indicated that greater attenuation (especially at higher frequencies) was the primary factor associated with poor performance on the fine discrimination task.

[1]  W G Noble,et al.  Theoretical and practical implications of the effects of hearing protection devices on localization ability. , 1972, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  G. Atherley,et al.  Effect of ear-defenders (ear-muffs) on the localization of sound , 1970, British journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  M F Cohen,et al.  The comparative effects of signal sensation level and sound-pressure level on interaural time discrimination. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Noise Localization after Unilateral Attenuation , 1966 .

[5]  Graeme Russell Limits to behavioral compensation for auditory localization in earmuff listening conditions , 1977 .

[6]  B L Lempert,et al.  Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[7]  E. A. G. Shaw Sound Pressure Transformation from the Free Field to the Eardrum , 1973 .

[8]  R. Lambert Dynamic theory of sound-source localization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  Localization of sound in rooms. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. H. Royster,et al.  Characteristics of several industrial noise environments , 1976 .

[11]  G R Atherley,et al.  Effect of ear-muffs on the localization of sound under reverberant conditions. , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[12]  T Houtgast,et al.  Lateralization threshold of a signal in noise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  L D Braida,et al.  Binaural pinna disparity: another auditory localization cue. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. Shaw Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E R Hafter,et al.  Lateralization of tonal signals which have neither onsets nor offsets. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  H Kunov,et al.  Effects of rise/decay time on the lateralization of interaurally delayed 1-kHz tones. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.