Lesion detection in simulated elastographic and echographic images: a psychophysical study.

The image quality of two ultrasonic imaging techniques was studied: conventional echography and the recently introduced elastography. The image quality was assessed by estimating the detectability of disc-shaped lesions of various sizes and contrast levels. The study was designed to verify the hypothesis that elastograms could show lesions at a higher subjective and objective level of detectability than echograms of the same object contrast. This hypothesis was adopted because homogeneous elastograms can present a higher point signal-to-noise ratio than uniform echograms. Both elastograms and echograms were generated by two-dimensional (2D) simulations. The subjective assessment was performed by psychophysical experiments using the staircase up-down method. The threshold contrast of detection for both modalities was determined at different diameters of the disc-shaped lesion. These values were used to construct the contrast-detail curves for both techniques. For identical object contrasts, elastography was found to have significantly higher detectability at all lesion diameters considered. The contrast thresholds were also used for an objective evaluation with the lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The objective measure evaluated at the subjective threshold of detection for both modalities was not found to be identical, nor constant over the range of lesion diameters as expected.

[1]  W. A. Verhoef,et al.  Texture of B-Mode Echograms: 3-D Simulations and Experiments of the Effects of Diffraction and Scatterer Density , 1985 .

[2]  J. M. Thijssen,et al.  Echographic Image Processing , 1992 .

[3]  C. Burckhardt Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[5]  Murray H. Loew,et al.  Objective analysis of ultrasound images by use of a computational observer , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound speckle size and lesion signal to noise ratio: verification of theory. , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[7]  H. Foley,et al.  Sensation and Perception , 2019 .

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Gray Level Transforms and Lesion Detectability in Echographic Images , 1988 .

[9]  H Lopez,et al.  A clinical evaluation of contrast-detail analysis for ultrasound images. , 1990, Medical physics.

[10]  J Ophir,et al.  Axial stress distributions between coaxial compressors in elastography: an analytical model. , 1992, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  L. Marton,et al.  Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics , 1958 .

[12]  I Céspedes,et al.  Diffraction correction methods for pulse-echo acoustic attenuation estimation. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  H Lopez,et al.  New contrast-detail phantoms for improved precision in lesion detection measurements. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  T J Hall,et al.  Ultrasound contrast-detail analysis: a preliminary study in human observer performance. , 1993, Medical physics.

[17]  Kunio Doi,et al.  An Empirical Investigation Of Variability In Contrast-Detail Diagram Measurements , 1983, Other Conferences.

[18]  J. Ophir,et al.  Reduction of Image Noise in Elastography , 1993 .

[19]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[20]  L. Wagner,et al.  Analysis of variations in contrast-detail experiments. , 1984, Medical physics.

[21]  H Lopez,et al.  Frequency independent ultrasound contrast-detail analysis. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[22]  K. A. Brownlee,et al.  The Up-and-Down Method with Small Samples , 1953 .

[23]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[25]  D. Middleton An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory , 1960 .

[26]  Jeffrey C. Bamber,et al.  Performance criteria for quantitative ultrasonology and image parameterisation , 1990 .

[27]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[28]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[29]  K. Parker,et al.  Deviations from Rayleigh Statistics in Ultrasonic Speckle , 1988, Ultrasonic imaging.

[30]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  On Observer Internal Noise , 1986, Other Conferences.

[31]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[32]  K J Parker,et al.  Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging". , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[33]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[34]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Methods for Estimating the Efficiency of Human and Computational Observers in Ultrasonography , 1993, IPMI.

[35]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: Elasticity Imaging Using Ultrasound with Application to Muscle and Breast in Vivo , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[36]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[37]  S. W. Smith,et al.  A contrast-detail analysis of diagnostic ultrasound imaging. , 1982, Medical physics.

[38]  London,et al.  Light, Colour and Vision , 1969 .

[39]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.