The effects of various wood preservative systems and treatment processes on the surface energy of wood and E-glass/phenolic pultruded composite material for wood reinforcement were characterized using surface energy methods. Southern yellow pine and pultruded E-glass/phenolic FRP (fiberglass reinforced plastic) composite sheet were treated with two common wood preservative chemicals (waterborne chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and organometallic copper naphthenate (CuN)). Surface energy of the pre- servative-treated and untreated wood and FRP composite material was determined by means of static contact angle analysis using the Good-Girifalco (geometric mean) and Chang approaches. It was found that the total surface energies of the surfaces of these materials were greatly affected by preservative treatments. As preservative retentions change, the surface energies of solids were also changed. The surface energy of CCA- and CuN-treated FRP composite decreased as a result of exposure to preservative treatments, while in- creased CCA retentions resulted in increases of surface energy in southern pine wood. This difference in surface energy behavior with CCA retention is attributed to the accumulation of high surface energy metallic salts on lumen surfaces in treated wood and the CSM layer of the FRP composite. Scanning electron microscopy showed deposits of metal oxides on the cell wall of CCA-treated wood. A discussion of surface energy changes and the possible effects on wettability and bondability of treated wood and FRP composite sur- faces is presented.
[1]
B. Collett.
A review of surface and interfacial adhesion in wood science and related fields
,
1972,
Wood Science and Technology.
[2]
B. Goodell,et al.
Bond durability characterization of preservative treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composite interfaces
,
2003
.
[3]
A. V. Pocius,et al.
Adhesion and Adhesives Technology
,
2002,
Adhesion and Adhesives Technology.
[4]
B. Goodell,et al.
Effects of wood-preservative treatments on mechanical properties of E-glass/ phenolic pultruded composite reinforcement for wood
,
2002
.
[5]
Richard P. Vlosky,et al.
Homeowner attitudes and preferences for building materials with an emphasis on treated wood products
,
2002
.
[6]
D. Gardner,et al.
Contact angle and IGC measurements for probing surface-chemical changes in the recycling of wood pulp fibers
,
2001
.
[7]
J. Rosenholm,et al.
Estimation of the Surface Energy and Acid-Base Properties of Wood by Means of Wetting Method
,
1998
.
[8]
Q. Shi,et al.
Surface tension, adhesive wettability, and bondability of artificially weathered CCA-treated southern pine
,
1997
.
[9]
M. Wolcott,et al.
Dynamic wettability of wood
,
1991
.
[10]
J. Youngquist,et al.
Compatibility of nonacidic waterborne preservatives with phenol-formaldehyde adhesive
,
1990
.
[11]
C. Hse.
Wettability of southern pine veneer by phenol formaldehyde wood adhesives
,
1972
.