Engineered temperature compensation in a synthetic genetic clock

Significance Synthetic gene circuits are often fragile, as perturbations to cellular conditions frequently alter their behavior. This lack of robustness limits the utility of engineered gene circuits and hinders advances in synthetic biology. Here, we demonstrate that environmental sensitivity can be reduced by simultaneously engineering circuits at the protein and network levels. Specifically, we designed and constructed a synthetic genetic clock that exhibits temperature compensation—the clock’s period does not depend on temperature. This feature is nontrivial since biochemical reactions speed up with increasing temperature. To accomplish this goal, we engineered thermal-inducibility into the clock’s regulatory structure. Computational modeling predicted and experiments confirmed that this thermal-inducibility results in a clock with a stable period across a large range of temperatures. Synthetic biology promises to revolutionize biotechnology by providing the means to reengineer and reprogram cellular regulatory mechanisms. However, synthetic gene circuits are often unreliable, as changes to environmental conditions can fundamentally alter a circuit’s behavior. One way to improve robustness is to use intrinsic properties of transcription factors within the circuit to buffer against intra- and extracellular variability. Here, we describe the design and construction of a synthetic gene oscillator in Escherichia coli that maintains a constant period over a range of temperatures. We started with a previously described synthetic dual-feedback oscillator with a temperature-dependent period. Computational modeling predicted and subsequent experiments confirmed that a single amino acid mutation to the core transcriptional repressor of the circuit results in temperature compensation. Specifically, we used a temperature-sensitive lactose repressor mutant that loses the ability to repress its target promoter at high temperatures. In the oscillator, this thermoinduction of the repressor leads to an increase in period at high temperatures that compensates for the decrease in period due to Arrhenius scaling of the reaction rates. The result is a transcriptional oscillator with a nearly constant period of 48 min for temperatures ranging from 30 °C to 41 °C. In contrast, in the absence of the mutation the period of the oscillator drops from 60 to 30 min over the same temperature range. This work demonstrates that synthetic gene circuits can be engineered to be robust to extracellular conditions through protein-level modifications.

[1]  J. W. Hastings,et al.  ON THE MECHANISM OF TEMPERATURE INDEPENDENCE IN A BIOLOGICAL CLOCK. , 1957, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  G. Chang,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer , 1996, Science.

[3]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Ruth J. Williams,et al.  Queueing up for Enzymatic Processing: Correlated Signaling through Coupled Degradation , 2022 .

[5]  Matthew R Bennett,et al.  Library of synthetic transcriptional AND gates built with split T7 RNA polymerase mutants , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jean-Marc Schwartz,et al.  Comprehensive Modelling of the Neurospora Circadian Clock and Its Temperature Compensation , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  J. Stelling,et al.  A tunable synthetic mammalian oscillator , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Engineered gene circuits , 2002, Nature.

[9]  John W. S. Brown,et al.  Alternative Splicing Mediates Responses of the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock to Temperature Changes[W] , 2012, Plant Cell.

[10]  John J Tyson,et al.  A proposal for robust temperature compensation of circadian rhythms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Brunner,et al.  Long and short isoforms of Neurospora clock protein FRQ support temperature‐compensated circadian rhythms , 2007, FEBS letters.

[12]  Michael Unser,et al.  Circadian gene expression is resilient to large fluctuations in overall transcription rates , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Robust multicellular computing using genetically encoded NOR gates and chemical ‘wires’ , 2011, Nature.

[14]  E. Winfree,et al.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Delay-induced degrade-and-fire oscillations in small genetic circuits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[16]  W. Szybalski,et al.  Construction of lacIts and lacIqts expression plasmids and evaluation of the thermosensitive lac repressor. , 1995, Gene.

[17]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  Synthetic biology: applications come of age , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  M. Bennett,et al.  Microfluidic devices for measuring gene network dynamics in single cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  Paul François,et al.  Adaptive Temperature Compensation in Circadian Oscillations , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[21]  Drew Endy,et al.  Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements , 2013, Nature Methods.

[22]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Entrainment of a Population of Synthetic Genetic Oscillators , 2011, Science.

[24]  Peter Ruoff,et al.  The relationship between FRQ-protein stability and temperature compensation in the Neurospora circadian clock. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Liao,et al.  A synthetic gene–metabolic oscillator , 2005, Nature.

[26]  J. Dunlap Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks , 1999, Cell.

[27]  A T Winfree Circadian rhythms. Resetting the human clock. , 1991, Nature.

[28]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[29]  Yiannis N. Kaznessis,et al.  Models for synthetic biology , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[30]  J. Dunlap,et al.  Negative feedback defining a circadian clock: autoregulation of the clock gene frequency. , 1994, Science.

[31]  W F Zimmerman,et al.  [A mathematical model for the temperature effects on circadian rhythms]. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  I. H. Segel Enzyme Kinetics: Behavior and Analysis of Rapid Equilibrium and Steady-State Enzyme Systems , 1975 .

[33]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Generic temperature compensation of biological clocks by autonomous regulation of catalyst concentration , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  James J. Collins,et al.  Genetic switchboard for synthetic biology applications , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Spatiotemporal Control of Cell Signalling Using A Light-Switchable Protein Interaction , 2009, Nature.

[36]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S3 Table S1 References Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2022 .

[37]  M. di Bernardo,et al.  A comparative analysis of synthetic genetic oscillators , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Design and connection of robust genetic circuits. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  Anthony Hall,et al.  The Molecular Basis of Temperature Compensation in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock[W] , 2006, The Plant Cell Online.

[40]  George Graham IV. A contrivance to avoid the irregularities in a clocks motion, occasion'd by the action of heat and cold upon the rod of the pendulum , 1727, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[41]  Javier Macía,et al.  Distributed biological computation with multicellular engineered networks , 2011, Nature.

[42]  K. Matthews,et al.  Flexibility in the inducer binding region is crucial for allostery in the Escherichia coli lactose repressor. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[43]  Alfonso Jaramillo,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of the forced LacI-AraC oscillator with a minimal gene regulatory model. , 2013, Chaos.

[44]  Achim Kramer,et al.  Tuning the Mammalian Circadian Clock: Robust Synergy of Two Loops , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  Markus Wieland,et al.  Programmable single-cell mammalian biocomputers , 2012, Nature.

[46]  Jay C Dunlap,et al.  The circadian clock of Neurospora crassa. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[47]  Daniel B. Forger,et al.  Signal processing in cellular clocks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Y. Lai,et al.  Engineering of regulated stochastic cell fate determination , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  M. Bennett,et al.  A fast, robust, and tunable synthetic gene oscillator , 2008, Nature.