Communities of practice in academia: Testing a quantitative model

Abstract Up to now, the relationships among the fundamental notions of communities of practice (CoPs), i.e. knowledge, participation, identity, and artifact development have been based mainly on results from qualitative studies; they are not yet sufficiently based on quantitative evidence. Starting from a literature review, we formulate a quantitative, causal model of CoPs that describes these variables in the context of academic communities, and aim to validate this model in two academic CoPs with a total of N = 208 participants. A cluster analysis classifies the participants into clusters that are in line with the core-periphery structure known from previous qualitative studies. A regression analysis provides evidence for the hypothesized model on the basis of quantitative data. Suggested directions for future research are to focus on factors that determine CoP participants' contributions to artifact development and on approaches to automated monitoring of virtual CoPs.

[1]  Tom Stewart Online communities , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Nicolae Nistor Knowledge communities in the classroom of the future , 2010 .

[3]  Silke Schworm,et al.  Online help-seeking in communities of practice: Modeling the acceptance of conceptual artifacts , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[5]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[6]  J. Dunn Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[7]  Martin Wessner,et al.  Analysing and cultivating scientific communities of practice , 2006, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[8]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges , 2010 .

[9]  Yew-Jin Lee,et al.  Contradictions in Theorizing and Implementing Communities in Education. , 2006 .

[10]  P. Hodkinson,et al.  Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning , 2005 .

[11]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  J. Assmann Communicative and Cultural Memory , 2011 .

[13]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[14]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning , 2004 .

[15]  Alison Fuller,et al.  Creating and using knowledge : an analysis of the differentiated nature of workplace learning environments , 2007 .

[16]  B. Jordan Cosmopolitical obstetrics: some insights from the training of traditional midwives. , 1989, Social science & medicine.

[17]  Alison Fuller,et al.  Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice , 2013 .

[18]  Jane Tobbell,et al.  Exploring transition to postgraduate study: Shifting identities in interaction with communities, practice and participation , 2010 .

[19]  A. Gillespie,et al.  Using Resources: Conceptualizing the Mediation and Reflective Use of Tools and Signs , 2010 .

[20]  T. Clark,et al.  Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice , 2006 .

[21]  Adrie J. Visscher,et al.  Subject departments as professional communities , 2004 .

[22]  A. Skelton Teacher identities in a research‐led institution: in the ascendancy or on the retreat? , 2012 .

[23]  A. Erll,et al.  Cultural memory studies , 2008 .

[24]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[25]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[26]  Martin Bonsen,et al.  Professionelle Lerngemeinschaften von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern , 2006 .

[27]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience , 2005, Internet High. Educ..