Spectral reflectance of sea foam in the visible and near-infrared: In situ measurements and remote sensing implications

The spectral reflectance of sea foam was measured at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Pier, La Jolla, California, by viewing the sea surface radiometrically in a region of breaking waves. Foam reflectance was found to decrease substantially with wavelength in the near-infrared, contrary to the findings of previous studies, theoretical as well as experimental. Values in the visible (0.44 μm) were reduced by typically 40% at 0.85 μm, 50% at 1.02 μm, and 85% at 1.65 μm. The spectral effect was explained by the nature of the foam, which is composed of large bubbles of air separated by a thin layer of water (foam stricto sensu) and of bubbles of air injected in the underlayer. The presence of bubbles in the underlayer enhances water absorption and thus reduces reflectance in the near-infrared. For ocean color remote sensing, affected by the presence of foam and aerosols, the consequences of neglecting the spectral dependence of foam are dramatic. With only a small amount of foam, in the presence of aerosols or not and thus irrespective of aerosol type, the errors in the retrieved water reflectance at 0.44 μm are above 0.01, which does not meet the accuracy goal of 0.001 for biological applications. Since under normal conditions the effect of foam may have the same magnitude as the effect of aerosols, atmospheric corrections will be inaccurate (and useless) in many cases, even taking into account the spectral dependence of the foam reflectance. Space observations potentially contaminated by an effective foam reflectance (product of reflectance and fractional coverage) above 0.001, i.e., corresponding to wind speeds above 8 m s−1, should be eliminated systematically. Utilization of near-infrared wavelengths above 0.9 μm for atmospheric corrections of ocean color, possible with the moderate-resolution imaging spectrometer (MODIS), would aggravate the problem. The measurements also indicated that foam significantly affects the retrieval of aerosol turbidity at 0.85 and 1.02 μm for wind speeds above 10 m s−1 but impacts minimally turbidity estimates at 1.65 μm. Over the oceans the spectral range above 1 μm is definitely recommended for remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol load and type from space.

[1]  H. Gordon,et al.  Influence of oceanic whitecaps on atmospheric correction of ocean-color sensors. , 1994, Applied optics.

[2]  H. Gordon,et al.  Albedo of the ocean-atmosphere system: influence of sea foam. , 1977, Applied optics.

[3]  Menghua Wang,et al.  Retrieval of water-leaving radiance and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm. , 1994, Applied optics.

[4]  R. C. Cooke,et al.  Bubble populations and spectra in coastal waters: A photographic approach , 1979 .

[5]  P. Stabeno,et al.  The Influence of Whitecaps on the Albedo of the Sea Surface , 1986 .

[6]  P. Parekh,et al.  Ambient sulfate concentrations and windflow patterns at Whiteface Mountain, New York , 1982 .

[7]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Multi-band automatic sun and sky scanning radiometer system for measurement of aerosols , 1994 .

[8]  S. Baldy A generation‐dispersion model of ambient and transient bubbles in the close vicinity of breaking waves , 1993 .

[9]  E. Monahan Occurrence and Evolution of Acoustically Relevant Sub-Surface Bubble Plumes and their Associated, Remotely Monitorable, Surface Whitecaps , 1993 .

[10]  Jin Wu,et al.  Bubbles in the near‐surface ocean: A general description , 1988 .

[11]  Bubbles between the wave trough and wave crest levels , 1987 .

[12]  Vince Salomonson,et al.  The moderate resolution imaging spectrometer (MODIS) science and data system requirements , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[14]  P Koepke,et al.  Effective reflectance of oceanic whitecaps. , 1984, Applied optics.

[15]  Stanford B. Hooker,et al.  An overview of the SeaWiFS Project , 1993 .

[16]  Annick Bricaud,et al.  The POLDER mission: instrument characteristics and scientific objectives , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  John C. Scott The role of salt in whitecap persistence , 1975 .

[18]  Edward C. Monahan,et al.  Optimal Power-Law Description of Oceanic Whitecap Coverage Dependence on Wind Speed , 1980 .

[19]  George A. Maul,et al.  On the Use of the Earth Resources Technology Satellite ( LANDSAT-1 ) in Optical Oceanography , 1975 .

[20]  S. Tassan The Influence of Wind in the Remote Sensing of Chlorophyll in the Sea , 1981 .

[21]  Charles H. Whitlock,et al.  Sea foam reflectance and influence on optimum wavelength for remote sensing of ocean aerosols , 1982 .

[22]  Maurice Herman,et al.  Fourier series expansion of the transfer equation in the atmosphere-ocean system , 1989 .

[23]  P. Koepke,et al.  Turbidity of the atmosphere determined from satellite: Calculation of optimum wavelength , 1981 .