Impact of Insolation Data Source on Remote Sensing Retrievals of Evapotranspiration over the California Delta

The energy delivered to the land surface via insolation is a primary driver of evapotranspiration (ET)—the exchange of water vapor between the land and atmosphere. Spatially distributed ET products are in great demand in the water resource management community for real-time operations and sustainable water use planning. The accuracy and deliverability of these products are determined in part by the characteristics and quality of the insolation data sources used as input to the ET models. This paper investigates the practical utility of three different insolation datasets within the context of a satellite-based remote sensing framework for mapping ET at high spatiotemporal resolution, in an application over the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta region in California. The datasets tested included one reanalysis product: The Climate System Forecast Reanalysis (CFSR) at 0.25◦ spatial resolution, and two remote sensing insolation products generated with geostationary satellite imagery: a product for the continental United States at 0.2◦, developed by the University of Wisconsin Space Sciences and Engineering Center (SSEC) and a coarser resolution (1◦) global Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) product. The three insolation data sources were compared to pyranometer data collected at flux towers within the Delta region to establish relative accuracy. The satellite products significantly outperformed CFSR, with root-mean square errors (RMSE) of 2.7, 1.5, and 1.4 MJ·m−2·d−1 for CFSR, CERES, and SSEC, respectively, at daily timesteps. The satellite-based products provided more accurate estimates of cloud occurrence and radiation transmission, while the reanalysis tended to underestimate solar radiation under cloudy-sky conditions. However, this difference in insolation performance did not translate into comparable improvement in the ET retrieval accuracy, where the RMSE in daily ET was 0.98 and 0.94 mm d−1 using the CFSR and SSEC insolation data sources, respectively, for all the flux sites combined. The lack of a notable impact on the aggregate ET performance may be due in part to the predominantly clear-sky conditions prevalent in central California, under which the reanalysis and satellite-based insolation data sources have comparable accuracy. While satellite-based insolation data could improve ET retrieval in more humid regions with greater cloud-cover frequency, over the California Delta and climatologically similar regions in the western U.S., the CFSR data may suffice for real-time ET modeling efforts.

[1]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A data fusion approach for mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scale , 2013 .

[2]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field scales over rainfed and irrigated agricultural areas using remote sensing data fusion , 2014 .

[3]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Field-scale mapping of evaporative stress indicators of crop yield: An application over Mead, NE, USA , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[4]  J. Thepaut,et al.  Toward a Consistent Reanalysis of the Climate System , 2014 .

[5]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[6]  J. Norman,et al.  Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature , 1995 .

[7]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Upscaling of evapotranspiration fluxes from instantaneous to daytime scales for thermal remote sensing applications , 2013 .

[8]  J. Norman,et al.  Remote sensing of surface energy fluxes at 101‐m pixel resolutions , 2003 .

[9]  John T. Young,et al.  The Man computer Interactive Data Access System: 25 Years of Interactive Processing , 1999 .

[10]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Use of remote sensing for evapotranspiration monitoring over land surfaces , 1996 .

[11]  Feng Gao,et al.  THE GRAPE REMOTE SENSING ATMOSPHERIC PROFILE AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION EXPERIMENT. , 2018, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[12]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  The effect of land cover type and structure on evapotranspiration from agricultural and wetland sites in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, California , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[13]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery , 2011 .

[14]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Temporal Interpolation Methods for the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Experiment , 1998 .

[15]  Chang-Hoi Ho,et al.  Parameterizations for Cloud Overlapping and Shortwave Single-Scattering Properties for Use in General Circulation and Cloud Ensemble Models , 1998 .

[16]  Xiaotong Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of the Reanalysis Surface Incident Shortwave Radiation Products from NCEP, ECMWF, GSFC, and JMA Using Satellite and Surface Observations , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[17]  D. Hodáňová An introduction to environmental biophysics , 1979, Biologia Plantarum.

[18]  Catherine Gautier,et al.  Surface Solar Radiation Flux and Cloud Radiative Forcing for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains (SGP): A Satellite, Surface Observations, and Radiative Transfer Model Study , 1997 .

[19]  Yun Yang,et al.  Field-Scale Assessment of Land and Water Use Change over the California Delta Using Remote Sensing , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[20]  L. García,et al.  Earth observation for water resources management : current use and future opportunities for the water sector , 2016 .

[21]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A Multiscale Remote Sensing Model for Disaggregating Regional Fluxes to Micrometeorological Scales , 2004 .

[22]  Mathew R. Schwaller,et al.  On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Mark Heuer,et al.  How Well Can We Measure the Vertical Wind Speed? Implications for Fluxes of Energy and Mass , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[24]  M. C. Anderson,et al.  Continuous evapotranspiration monitoring and water stress at watershed scale in a Mediterranean oak savanna , 2016, Remote Sensing.

[25]  E. Wood,et al.  Development of a 50-Year High-Resolution Global Dataset of Meteorological Forcings for Land Surface Modeling , 2006 .

[26]  Hector Nieto,et al.  Evapotranspiration estimates derived using thermal-based satellite remote sensing and data fusion for irrigation management in California vineyards , 2018, Irrigation Science.

[27]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[28]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Mapping daily evapotranspiration at Landsat spatial scales during the BEAREX’08 field campaign , 2012 .

[29]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Monitoring daily evapotranspiration over two California vineyards using Landsat 8 in a multi-sensor data fusion approach , 2016 .

[30]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Impact of Tile Drainage on Evapotranspiration in South Dakota, USA, Based on High Spatiotemporal Resolution Evapotranspiration Time Series From a Multisatellite Data Fusion System , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A Two-Source Time-Integrated Model for Estimating Surface Fluxes Using Thermal Infrared Remote Sensing , 1997 .

[32]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[33]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Daily Landsat-scale evapotranspiration estimation over a forested landscape in North Carolina, USA using multi-satellite data fusion , 2016 .

[34]  John M. Norman,et al.  Agricultural Management Decision Aids Driven by Real-Time Satellite Data , 1998 .

[35]  Rachel T. Pinker,et al.  Evaluation of Surface Shortwave Flux Estimates from GOES: Sensitivity to Sensor Calibration , 2006 .

[36]  George R. Diak,et al.  Investigations of improvements to an operational GOES-satellite-data-based insolation system using pyranometer data from the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) , 2017 .

[37]  T. W. Horst,et al.  Correction of a Non-orthogonal, Three-Component Sonic Anemometer for Flow Distortion by Transducer Shadowing , 2015, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[38]  George R. Diak,et al.  Improvements to models and methods for evaluating the land-surface energy balance and ‘effective’ roughness using radiosonde reports and satellite-measured ‘skin’ temperature data , 1993 .

[39]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[40]  William J. Massman,et al.  A Bayesian model to correct underestimated 3-D wind speeds from sonic anemometers increases turbulent components of the surface energy balance , 2016 .

[41]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources , 2017 .

[42]  John M. Norman,et al.  Estimating Fluxes on Continental Scales Using Remotely Sensed Data in an Atmospheric–Land Exchange Model , 1999 .

[43]  Ramesh S. V. Teegavarapu,et al.  Optimal solar radiation sensor network design using spatial and geostatistical analyses , 2016 .

[44]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation , 2007 .

[45]  Catherine Gautier,et al.  Improvements to a Simple Physical Model for Estimating Insolation from GOES Data , 1983 .

[46]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[47]  William J. Massman,et al.  Underestimates of sensible heat flux due to vertical velocity measurement errors in non-orthogonal sonic anemometers , 2013 .

[48]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  An analytical model for estimating canopy transpiration and carbon assimilation fluxes based on canopy light-use efficiency , 2000 .

[49]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[50]  Jennifer M. Jacobs,et al.  Use of Visible Geostationary Operational Meteorological Satellite Imagery in Mapping Reference and Potential Evapotranspiration over Florida , 2011 .

[51]  J. Norman,et al.  Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover , 1999 .

[52]  T. A. Black,et al.  On the temporal upscaling of evapotranspiration from instantaneous remote sensing measurements to 8-day mean daily-sums , 2012 .

[53]  Chandra S. Pathak,et al.  A Calibrated, High‐Resolution GOES Satellite Solar Insolation Product for a Climatology of Florida Evapotranspiration 1 , 2009 .

[54]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Microwave implementation of two-source energy balance approach for estimating evapotranspiration. , 2017, Hydrology and earth system sciences.

[55]  Feng Gao,et al.  Investigating water use over the Choptank River Watershed using a multisatellite data fusion approach , 2017 .

[56]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Partitioning solar radiation into direct and diffuse, visible and near-infrared components , 1985 .

[57]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Clouds and Earth Radiant Energy System (CERES), a review: Past, present and future , 2011 .