Strengthening the Monitoring of Violations against Journalists through an Events-Based Methodology

Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicator 16.10.1 proposes an important monitoring agenda for the global recording of a range of violations against journalists as a means to prevent attacks on the communicative functions of journalism. However, the need for extensive collection of data on violations against journalists raises a number of methodological challenges. Our research shows the following issues must be addressed: the lack of conceptual consistency; the lack of methodological transparency; the need for sophisticated data categorisation and disaggregation to enable data to be merged from different sources; the need to establish links to understand causal and temporal relations between people and events; and the need to explore and utilize previously untapped data sources. If we are to strengthen the monitoring of SDG 16.10.1, we propose to develop a robust and reliable events-based methodology and a set of tools which can facilitate the monitoring of the full range of proposed 16.10.1 categories of violations, reconcile data from multiple sources in order to adhere to the established 16.10.1 category definitions, and to further disaggregate the proposed 16.10.1 categories to provide more in-depth information on each instance of a violations. This, we argue, will ultimately contribute towards better understanding of the contextual circumstances and processes producing aggressions against journalists.

[1]  S. Waisbord Democratic Journalism and “Statelessness” , 2007 .

[2]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Harrison,et al.  The politics of impunity: A study of journalists’ experiential accounts of impunity in Bulgaria, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Mexico and Pakistan , 2018, Journalism.

[4]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Global Disinformation Index , 2019, Proceedings of the Conference for Truth and Trust Online 2019.

[5]  Jennifer R. Henrichsen,et al.  Building digital safety for journalism: a survey of selected issues , 2015 .

[6]  John Borrie,et al.  Thinking outside the box in multilateral disarmament and arms control negotiations , 2006 .

[7]  W. Cole Durham,et al.  Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe: Lisbon Document 1996 , 1997, International Legal Materials.

[8]  Sara Torsner Profiling the Civil Diminishment of Journalism: A conceptual framework for understanding the causes and manifestations of risk to journalism , 2019 .

[9]  Brambila Forced Silence: Determinants of Journalist Killings in Mexico's States, 2010–2015 , 2017, Journal of Information Policy.

[10]  N. Wilson,et al.  Killing the canary: the international epidemiology of the homicide of media workers , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[11]  D. J. Young,et al.  Assaults on the Fourth Estate: Explaining Media Harassment in Africa , 2013 .

[12]  A. Freytag,et al.  An offer you can’t refuse: murdering journalists as an enforcement mechanism of corrupt deals , 2011, Public Choice.

[13]  J. Wortis Getting away with murder , 1990, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  Reeta Pöyhtäri,et al.  The Assault on Journalism : Building knowledge to protect freedom of expression , 2017 .

[15]  C. Kopp,et al.  Written Evidence to the Inquiry on Disinformation and ‘fake news’, House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee , 2018 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Political Rights and Political Liberties in Nations: An Evaluation of Human Rights Measures, 1950 to 1984 , 1986 .

[17]  Sabine C. Carey,et al.  Canaries in a coal-mine? What the killings of journalists tell us about future repression , 2017, Journal of peace research.

[18]  Diana Maynard,et al.  Towards an Infrastructure for Understanding and Interlinking Knowledge Co-Creation in European research , 2017 .

[19]  Kalina Bontcheva,et al.  A framework for real-time semantic social media analysis , 2017, J. Web Semant..

[20]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[21]  N. Wilson,et al.  Violent deaths of media workers associated with conflict in Iraq, 2003–2012 , 2014, PeerJ.

[22]  S. Waisbord Antipress Violence and the Crisis of the State , 2002 .

[23]  C. Ferreira,et al.  Micro, Meso and Macro Levels of Social Analysis , 2019, International Journal of Social Science Studies.

[24]  Simon Cottle,et al.  Reporting Dangerously: Journalist Killings, Intimidation and Security , 2016 .

[25]  Piek T. J. M. Vossen,et al.  SemEval-2018 Task 5: Counting Events and Participants in the Long Tail , 2018, *SEMEVAL.

[26]  C. Ferreira,et al.  Challenges in the Teaching of Sociology in Higher Education. Contributions to a Discussion , 2017 .

[27]  Amanda M. Murdie,et al.  Killing the Messenger: Regime Type as a Determinant of Journalist Killing, 1992–2008 , 2016 .

[28]  A. Montiel World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development. Global Report 2017/2018 , 2018 .

[29]  R. Coupland,et al.  SECURITY OF JOURNALISTS: MAKING THE CASE FOR MODELLING ARMED VIOLENCE AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE HUMAN SECURITY , 2006 .

[30]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature , 2018 .

[31]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Leveraging the Crowd to Detect and Reduce the Spread of Fake News and Misinformation , 2017, WSDM.

[32]  Ken D. Allan Contemporary Social and Sociological Theory: Visualizing Social Worlds , 2006 .