An electromechanical spinal injury technique with dynamic sensitivity.

Over the past decade, our laboratory has attempted to create a simple, accurate device that could be used to produce reliable and quantifiable spinal cord injuries in the rodent. We report here on our latest of several modifications of a spinal cord impactor that has allowed us to meet these design criteria. The impactor uses the dynamic capacity of an electromagnetic driver (Ling shaker) and a unique pattern generator to briefly compress the dorsal surface of the spinal cord at velocities that may mimic compression injuries seen in the human. Calibrated, independent transducer systems provide open-loop output of the precise movement (displacement) of the impactor probe and the force necessary to achieve a given displacement. Touch sensitivity is accomplished by vibrating the probe slightly as it approaches the dural surface. This also allows a known biomechanical starting point. This combination of improvements in sensitivity and ability to measure all components of the dynamic compression has allowed us to determine detailed biomechanical descriptors of these impact injuries with low coefficients of variation. Furthermore, such descriptors correlate highly with histopathologic and behavioral outcome measures in animal populations with a variety of injury severities.

[1]  D. Noyes Correlation between parameters of spinal cord impact and resultant injury , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[2]  D. A. Poulos,et al.  Analysis and measurement of some sources of variability in experimental spinal cord trauma. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  E. Hall,et al.  Effect of delayed administration of U74006F (tirilazad mesylate) on recovery of locomotor function after experimental spinal cord injury. , 1991, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  D C Viano,et al.  Interaction of contact velocity and cord compression in determining the severity of spinal cord injury. , 1988, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  B. Stokes,et al.  NIH workshop on experimental spinal cord injury: modeling and criteria. , 1992, Journal of Neurotrauma.

[6]  R. W. Ford A reproducible spinal cord injury model in the cat. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  B. Stokes,et al.  Fetal grafts alter chronic behavioral outcome after contusion damage to the adult rat spinal cord , 1992, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  N. Grover,et al.  Sensitivity of exponentially growing populations of Escherichia coli to photo-induced psoralen-DNA interstrand crosslinks. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[9]  L. Noble,et al.  An inexpensive apparatus for producing graded spinal cord contusive injury in the rat , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[10]  R. McGhee,et al.  Possible mechanisms for observed pathophysiological variability in experimental spinal cord injury by the method of Allen. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  B. Stokes,et al.  Three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of graded contusion lesions in the spinal cord of the rat. , 1991, Journal of neurotrauma.

[12]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Experimental Spinal Cord Injury and Functional Loss , 1988, Spine.

[13]  M. Beattie,et al.  A behavioral and anatomical analysis of spinal cord injury produced by a feedback-controlled impaction device , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  B. Stokes,et al.  Functional analysis of an electromechanical spinal cord injury device , 1987, Experimental Neurology.