Likelihood ratio sequential sampling models of recognition memory

The mirror effect - a phenomenon whereby a manipulation produces opposite effects on hit and false alarm rates - is benchmark regularity of recognition memory. A likelihood ratio decision process, basing recognition on the relative likelihood that a stimulus is a target or a lure, naturally predicts the mirror effect, and so has been widely adopted in quantitative models of recognition memory. Glanzer, Hilford, and Maloney (2009) demonstrated that likelihood ratio models, assuming Gaussian memory strength, are also capable of explaining regularities observed in receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs), such as greater target than lure variance. Despite its central place in theorising about recognition memory, however, this class of models has not been tested using response time (RT) distributions. In this article, we develop a linear approximation to the likelihood ratio transformation, which we show predicts the same regularities as the exact transformation. This development enabled us to develop a tractable model of recognition-memory RT based on the diffusion decision model (DDM), with inputs (drift rates) provided by an approximate likelihood ratio transformation. We compared this "LR-DDM" to a standard DDM where all targets and lures receive their own drift rate parameters. Both were implemented as hierarchical Bayesian models and applied to four datasets. Model selection taking into account parsimony favored the LR-DDM, which requires fewer parameters than the standard DDM but still fits the data well. These results support log-likelihood based models as providing an elegant explanation of the regularities of recognition memory, not only in terms of choices made but also in terms of the times it takes to make them.

[1]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[2]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  D. Norman,et al.  Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory ☆ , 1966 .

[4]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  A Survey of Model Evaluation Approaches With a Tutorial on Hierarchical Bayesian Methods , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory , 1976 .

[7]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Kantner,et al.  Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[9]  W. Estes,et al.  Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  The structure of short-term memory scanning: an investigation using response time distribution models , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[11]  Brandon M. Turner,et al.  A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[12]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .

[13]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[14]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Adam F. Osth,et al.  Stimulus Type and the List Strength Paradigm , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  A. Criss The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect , 2006 .

[17]  John T Wixted,et al.  Cognitive theories as reinforcement history surrogates: The case of likelihood ratio models of human recognition memory , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[18]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Fundamental causes of systematic and random variability in recognition memory , 2016 .

[19]  M. Lee,et al.  Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course , 2014 .

[20]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[21]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[23]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance , 2002 .

[25]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of Decision Biases Affecting Delayed Recognition of Emotional Stimuli , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Methodological and empirical developments for the Ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy , 2009 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Journal of Memory and Language Manuscript Draft Title: Differentiating the Differentiation Models: a Comparison of the Retrieving Effectively from Memory Model (rem) and the Subjective Likelihood Model (slim) Differentiating the Differentiation Models: a Comparison , 2022 .

[30]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency. , 1997 .

[31]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  C. White,et al.  Decomposing bias in different types of simple decisions. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  Criterion Setting and the Dynamics of Recognition Memory , 2011, CogSci.

[36]  Michael S. Pratte,et al.  Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Christopher Donkin,et al.  Discrete-slots models of visual working-memory response times. , 2013, Psychological review.

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[39]  J T Wixted,et al.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  D. L. Hintzman On explaining the mirror effect. , 1994 .

[42]  Pernille Hemmer,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition The Shape of Things to Come : Evaluating Word Frequency as a Continuous Variable in Recognition Memory , 2013 .

[43]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. , 2009, Psychological review.

[44]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. , 1993 .

[45]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Assessing the dissociability of recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Andreas Voss,et al.  Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: a tutorial based on fast-dm-30 , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[47]  Simon Dennis,et al.  Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[48]  M. Humphreys,et al.  A context noise model of episodic word recognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[49]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[50]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: A recognition memory study , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[51]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[52]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Intralist interference in recognition memory. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging on Recognition Memory Journal of Memory and Language , 2003 .

[55]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  A. Heathcote,et al.  Averaging learning curves across and within participants , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[57]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  S. Viotti,et al.  Do positive relations with patients play a protective role for healthcare employees? Effects of patients' gratitude and support on nurses' burnout , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[59]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect , 2002 .

[61]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  M. Lee,et al.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[63]  L. T. DeCarlo Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[64]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Memorability, Word Frequency and Negative Recognition* , 1977 .

[66]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[67]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[68]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[69]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[70]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[71]  J. Starns Using response time modeling to distinguish memory and decision processes in recognition and source tasks , 2014, Memory & Cognition.

[72]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  Adam F. Osth,et al.  Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory. , 2015, Psychological review.

[74]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[75]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[76]  I. J. Myung,et al.  The Importance of Complexity in Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[77]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  What cognitive processes drive response biases? A diffusion model analysis , 2011, Judgment and Decision Making.

[78]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[79]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[80]  Andreas Voss,et al.  A fast numerical algorithm for the estimation of diffusion model parameters , 2008 .

[81]  M. Lee How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. , 2011 .

[82]  Amy H Criss,et al.  Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[83]  Shaney Flores,et al.  The effects of weak versus strong relational judgments on response bias in Two-Alternative-Forced-Choice recognition: Is the test criterion-free? , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[84]  Arndt Bröder,et al.  Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods , 2015, Psychological research.

[85]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition , 2019 .

[86]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[87]  Lawrence T DeCarlo,et al.  The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. , 2010, Psychological review.

[89]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[90]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[91]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: concentering of underlying distributions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.