Stochastic Gust Analysis Techniques for Aircraft Conceptual Design

Dynamic loading constraints due to maneuver and gust loads are an important design consideration for novel aircraft configurations. Incorporating these constraints in the early design process with an appropriate level of fidelity presents a significant challenge, due both to the need for more detailed aerodynamics and control modeling, and to the stochastic nature of the gust encounter problem. This paper presents a stochastic gust analysis approach that is suitable for a multidisciplinary design optimization setting that incorporates dynamic loading constraints. The analysis approach employs Lyapunov and matched filter theory methods to address the stochastic nature of the gust response. A set of gust simulation studies are carried out to assess the relative importance of the various physics involved in aircraft gust encounters and the effects of different modeling assumptions. The study demonstrates the importance of modeling rigid body motion, pitch dynamics, and aircraft flexibility, but shows that for gust encounters at typical flight conditions, a quasisteady aerodynamics assumption is reasonable for load predictions over the majority of the wing acerage, meaning that full unsteady aerodynamic simulations are likely not required for typical gust lengths.

[1]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  An interactive system for aircraft design and optimization , 1992 .

[2]  E. Livne Alternative Approximations for Integrated Control/Structure Aeroservoelastic Synthesis , 1993 .

[3]  Robert C. Scott,et al.  Computation of maximized gust loads for nonlinear aircraft using matched-filter-based schemes , 1993 .

[4]  C. E. Lan,et al.  Analysis of Random Gust Response with Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[5]  Eli Livne,et al.  Integrated aeroservoelastic optimization - Status and direction , 1997 .

[6]  Eli Livne,et al.  Integrated Aeroservoelastic Optimization: Status and Direction , 1999 .

[7]  Raymond M. Kolonay,et al.  Optimal scheduling of control surfaces on flexible wings to reduce induced drag , 2006 .

[8]  Youdan Kim,et al.  Optimal wing planform design for aeroelastic control , 2000 .

[9]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Worst-Case Gust-Response Analysis for Typical Airfoil Section with Control Surface , 2005 .

[10]  Anthony S. Pototzky,et al.  On the relationship between matched filter theory as applied to gust loads and phased design loads analysis , 1989 .

[11]  Brian Sanders,et al.  Optimal Scheduling of Control Surfaces on a Flexible Wing to Reduce Induced Drag , 2004 .

[12]  Nabil Aouf,et al.  Robust gust load alleviation for a flexible aircraft , 2000 .

[13]  F. Eastep,et al.  Induced Drag Minimization with Optimal Scheduling of Virtual Surface Deflection Boundary Conditions , 2006 .

[14]  Arie Zole,et al.  Continuous Gust Response and Sensitivity Derivatives Using State-Space Models , 1994 .

[15]  Mark Drela,et al.  INTEGRATED SIMULATION MODEL FOR PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC, STRUCTURAL, AND CONTROL-LAW DESIGN OF AIRCRAFT , 1999 .

[16]  R. L. Swaim,et al.  An analytical method for ride quality of flexible airplanes , 1977 .

[17]  E. Nissim,et al.  Application of the aerodynamic energy concept to flutter suppression and gust alleviation by use of active controls , 1976 .

[18]  Jessica A. Woods,et al.  NASA investigation of a claimed 'overlap' between two gust response analysis methods , 1990 .