Sensumotor transformation of input devices and the impact on practice and task difficulty

In the present study, the usability of two laptop input devices, touchpad and trackpoint, is evaluated. The focus is set on the impact of sensumotor transformation of input devices on practice and task difficulty. Thirty novices and 14 experts operated either touchpad or trackpoint over a period of 1600 trials of a point-click task. As hypothesized, novices and experts operated the touchpad by 15% faster compared to the trackpoint. For novices, performance rose distinctly and levelled off after 960 trials. This consolidation occurred earlier than reported in literature (1400–1600 trials) and, contrary to the assumption, learning was similar for touchpad and trackpoint. The impact of task difficulty dropped remarkably by practice, which points at a more general than specific task learning. In conclusion, ergonomic guidelines can be derived for the user-specific optimization of the usage of touchpad and trackpoint. Actual and potential applications of this research include the user-specific optimization of laptop input devices. Within the theoretical framework of psychomotor models, a profound knowledge of user behaviour in human – computer interaction is provided. Ergonomic guidelines can be derived for the efficient usage of laptop input devices and an optimized hardware and software design.

[1]  J. R. De Jong,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INCREASING SKILL ON CYCLE TIME AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR TIME STANDARDS , 1957 .

[2]  Ulrich Tränkle,et al.  Factors influencing speed and precision of cursor positioning using a mouse , 1991 .

[3]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Cursor Control Device Characteristics , 2000, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Michael Tlauka,et al.  Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance , 2004, Ergonomics.

[7]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[8]  N Walker,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Rapid Cursor-Positioning Movements with Electromechanical Mice in Human-Computer Interaction , 1993, Human factors.

[9]  A Mark Williams,et al.  Changes in coordination, control and outcome as a result of extended practice on a novel motor skill , 2005, Ergonomics.

[10]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Forward/up directional incompatibilities during cursor placement within graphical user interfaces , 2005, Ergonomics.

[12]  E A FLEISHMAN,et al.  Dimensional analysis of psychomotor abilities. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Interacting With Notebook Input Devices: An Analysis of Motor Performance and Users' Expertise , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[14]  J. Shawn Farris,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Cursor Trajectories Controlled With a Touchpad , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  The ergonomics of computer pointing devices , 1997, Advanced perspectives in applied computing.

[16]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Mouse And Display Tablets As Cursor Control Devices , 2004, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Jochen Müsseler,et al.  User Specific Design of Interfaces and Interaction Techniques: What Do Older Computer Users Need? , 2007, HCI.

[18]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[19]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Effect of target shape on movement time in a Fitts task. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[20]  C Sutter,et al.  Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults , 2007, Ergonomics.

[21]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Psychomotor Performance of Input Device Users and Optimized Cursor Control , 2006 .

[22]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Psychomotor Efficiency in Users of Notebook Input Devices: Confirmation and Restrictions of Fitts' Law as an Evaluative Tool for User-Friendly Design , 2004 .

[23]  Paul M. Fitts,et al.  Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning1 , 1964 .

[24]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.