Local Algorithms for Sensor Selection

We study local algorithms for sensor selection, in which each sensor in a network uses information from nearby sensors alone to decide if it should be selected to predict the data of non-selected sensors. Our goal is to show how the prediction quality can be improved by increasing the level of knowledge available to each sensor. We specifically study this for a graph model of the network, in which prediction quality is defined by virtual links between sensors. Each node knows the links along all paths of fixed length extending outward from itself. The maximum path length increases with the level of knowledge. We designed algorithms for the first few levels and evaluated them on randomly generated graphs and real datasets, determining the optimal parameters for each algorithm and comparing them to baseline global strategies. Our results show that just knowing the links to immediate neighbors is enough to be as good as a simple global greedy algorithm, and increasing the knowledge improves the selection quality.

[1]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Exposure in Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Practical Solutions , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[2]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  On sensor selection in linked information networks , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS).

[3]  Vishnu Navda,et al.  Efficient gathering of correlated data in sensor networks , 2008, TOSN.

[4]  Samir Khuller,et al.  The Budgeted Maximum Coverage Problem , 1999, Inf. Process. Lett..

[5]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-Optimal Sensor Placements in Gaussian Processes: Theory, Efficient Algorithms and Empirical Studies , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  P. Jones,et al.  A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950-2006 , 2008 .

[7]  Max Mühlhäuser,et al.  A Classification of Locality in Network Research , 2017, ACM Comput. Surv..

[8]  Ran Wolff,et al.  A Local Facility Location Algorithm for Large-scale Distributed Systems , 2007, Journal of Grid Computing.

[9]  Dror Rawitz,et al.  The Price of Incorrectly Aggregating Coverage Values in Sensor Selection , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Online distributed sensor selection , 2010, IPSN '10.

[12]  Kay Römer,et al.  Distributed Facility Location Algorithms for Flexible Configuration of Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, DCOSS.

[13]  K. Chakrabarty,et al.  Target localization based on energy considerations in distributed sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[14]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Near-Optimal Sensor Placement for Linear Inverse Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Nicola Santoro,et al.  Distributed Facility Location for Sensor Network Maintenance , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Networks.