Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT.

PURPOSE To develop a consensus standard for quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A standard for CAC quantification was developed by a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international consortium of cardiac radiologists, medical physicists, and industry representatives. This report specifically describes the standardization of scan acquisition and reconstruction parameters, the use of patient size-specific tube current values to achieve a prescribed image noise, and the use of the calcium mass score to eliminate scanner- and patient size-based variations. An anthropomorphic phantom containing calibration inserts and additional phantom rings were used to simulate small, medium-size, and large patients. The three phantoms were scanned by using the recommended protocols for various computed tomography (CT) systems to determine the calibration factors that relate measured CT numbers to calcium hydroxyapatite density and to determine the tube current values that yield comparable noise values. Calculation of the calcium mass score was standardized, and the variance in Agatston, volume, and mass scores was compared among CT systems. RESULTS Use of the recommended scanning parameters resulted in similar noise for small, medium-size, and large phantoms with all multi-detector row CT scanners. Volume scores had greater interscanner variance than did Agatston and calcium mass scores. Use of a fixed calcium hydroxyapatite density threshold (100 mg/cm(3)), as compared with use of a fixed CT number threshold (130 HU), reduced interscanner variability in Agatston and calcium mass scores. With use of a density segmentation threshold, the calcium mass score had the smallest variance as a function of patient size. CONCLUSION Standardized quantification of CAC yielded comparable image noise, spatial resolution, and mass scores among different patient sizes and different CT systems and facilitated reduced radiation dose for small and medium-size patients.

[1]  J G Goldin,et al.  Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[2]  B. Thompson,et al.  Influence of body size and section level on calcium phantom measurements at coronary artery calcium CT scanning. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Electron-beam CT: the effect of using a correction function on coronary artery calcium quantitation. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[4]  Y. Arad,et al.  Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  W. Kalender,et al.  Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.

[6]  C H McCollough,et al.  Electron-beam CT: use of a calibration phantom to reduce variability in calcium quantitation. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  J G Goldin,et al.  Interscan variation in coronary artery calcium quantification in a large asymptomatic patient population. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[9]  W A Kalender,et al.  ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  Michael Motro,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: comparison between 55 and 165 mAs. , 2005, Radiology.

[11]  Richard D. White,et al.  Potential clinical impact of variability in the measurement of coronary artery calcification with sequential MDCT. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  S. Rich,et al.  Reproducibility of the measurement of coronary calcium with ultrafast computed tomography. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Coronary artery calcium quantification at multi-detector row CT: influence of heart rate and measurement methods on interacquisition variability initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  T. Callister,et al.  Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. , 1998, Radiology.

[16]  T. Callister,et al.  Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography. , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  J Simon,et al.  Image reconstruction and performance evaluation for ECG-gated spiral scanning with a 16-slice CT system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  C. Becker,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT , 2002, European Radiology.

[19]  R. Detrano,et al.  Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. , 1996, American heart journal.