Machine Learning-Empowered Biometric Methods for Biomedicine Applications

Nowadays, pervasive computing technologies are paving a promising way for advanced smart health applications. However, a key impediment faced by wide deployment of these assistive smart devices, is the increasing privacy and security issue, such as how to protect access to sensitive patient data in the health record. Focusing on this challenge, biometrics are attracting intense attention in terms of effective user identification to enable confidential health applications. In this paper, we take special interest in two bio-potential-based biometric modalities, electrocardiogram (ECG) and electroencephalogram (EEG), considering that they are both unique to individuals, and more reliable than token (identity card) and knowledge-based (username/password) methods. After extracting effective features in multiple domains from ECG/EEG signals, several advanced machine learning algorithms are introduced to perform the user identification task, including Neural Network, K-nearest Neighbor, Bagging, Random Forest and AdaBoost. Experimental results on two public ECG and EEG datasets show that ECG is a more robust biometric modality compared to EEG, leveraging a higher signal to noise ratio and also more distinguishable morphological patterns. Among different machine learning classifiers, the random forest greatly outperforms the others and owns an identification rate as high as 98%. This study is expected to demonstrate that properly selected biometric empowered by an effective machine learner owns a great potential, to enable confidential biomedicine applications in the era of smart digital health.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[2]  L. Benedicenti,et al.  The electroencephalogram as a biometric , 2001, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555).

[3]  A. Hassan,et al.  A decision support system for automatic sleep staging from EEG signals using tunable Q-factor wavelet transform and spectral features , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Chee-Ming Ting,et al.  ECG based personal identification using extended Kalman filter , 2010, 10th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA 2010).

[5]  Ramaswamy Palaniappan,et al.  Method of identifying individuals using VEP signals and neural network , 2004 .

[6]  A. Lymberis,et al.  Smart wearable systems for personalised health management: current R&D and future challenges , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[7]  Woo Chaw Seng,et al.  A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Ahnaf Rashik Hassan,et al.  An expert system for automated identification of obstructive sleep apnea from single-lead ECG using random under sampling boosting , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[9]  Ana L. N. Fred,et al.  Unveiling the Biometric Potential of Finger-Based ECG Signals , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[10]  Shai Ben-David,et al.  Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms , 2014 .

[11]  X. Tang,et al.  Classification of Electrocardiogram Signals with RS and Quantum Neural Networks , 2014, MUE 2014.

[12]  Ahnaf Rashik Hassan,et al.  Computer-aided obstructive sleep apnea detection using normal inverse Gaussian parameters and adaptive boosting , 2016, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[13]  Tanu Sharma,et al.  A novel feature extraction for robust EMG pattern recognition , 2016, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[14]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  A Novel Feature Extraction for Robust EMG Pattern Recognition , 2009, ArXiv.

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  MACHINE LEARNING An Artificial Intelligence Approach , 2009 .

[16]  Miad Faezipour,et al.  Sleep Stage Classification Using EEG Signal Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey and New Investigation , 2016, Entropy.

[17]  Roberto Di Pietro,et al.  Smart health: A context-aware health paradigm within smart cities , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Roozbeh Jafari,et al.  A case study on minimum energy operation for dynamic time warping signal processing in wearable computers , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[19]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Automatic identification of epileptic seizures from EEG signals using linear programming boosting , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[20]  Jianchu Yao,et al.  A wavelet method for biometric identification using wearable ECG sensors , 2008, 2008 5th International Summer School and Symposium on Medical Devices and Biosensors.

[21]  Xuan Zeng,et al.  A novel machine learning-enabled framework for instantaneous heart rate monitoring from motion-artifact-corrupted electrocardiogram signals , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[22]  C. Peng,et al.  Age-related alterations in the fractal scaling of cardiac interbeat interval dynamics. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  Serena Ng,et al.  Tests for Skewness, Kurtosis, and Normality for Time Series Data , 2005 .

[24]  Dian Zhou,et al.  A Novel Framework for Motion-Tolerant Instantaneous Heart Rate Estimation by Phase-Domain Multiview Dynamic Time Warping , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Roozbeh Jafari,et al.  An ECG dataset representing real-world signal characteristics for wearable computers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[26]  Xuan Zeng,et al.  Highly wearable cuff-less blood pressure and heart rate monitoring with single-arm electrocardiogram and photoplethysmogram signals , 2017, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.