Feasibility study of a point‐of‐care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability

PURPOSE We investigated the feasibility of a novel positron emission tomography (PET) system that provides near real-time feedback to an operator who can interactively scan a patient to optimize image quality. The system should be compact and mobile to support point-of-care (POC) molecular imaging applications. In this study, we present the key technologies required and discuss the potential benefits of such new capability. METHODS The core of this novel PET technology includes trackable PET detectors and a fully three-dimensional, fast image reconstruction engine implemented on multiple graphics processing units (GPUs) to support dynamically changing geometry by calculating the system matrix on-the-fly using a tube-of-response approach. With near real-time image reconstruction capability, a POC-PET system may comprise a maneuverable front PET detector and a second detector panel which can be stationary or moved synchronously with the front detector such that both panels face the region-of-interest (ROI) with the detector trajectory contoured around a patient's body. We built a proof-of-concept prototype using two planar detectors each consisting of a photomultiplier tube (PMT) optically coupled to an array of 48 × 48 lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystals (1.0 × 1.0 × 10.0 mm3 each). Only 38 × 38 crystals in each arrays can be clearly re-solved and used for coincidence detection. One detector was mounted to a robotic arm which can position it at arbitrary locations, and the other detector was mounted on a rotational stage. A cylindrical phantom (102 mm in diameter, 150 mm long) with nine spherical lesions (8:1 tumor-to-background activity concentration ratio) was imaged from 27 sampling angles. List-mode events were reconstructed to form images without or with time-of-flight (TOF) information. We conducted two Monte Carlo simulations using two POC-PET systems. The first one uses the same phantom and detector setup as our experiment, with the detector coincidence re-solving time (CRT) ranging from 100 to 700 ps full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM). The second study simulates a body-size phantom (316 × 228 × 160 mm3 ) imaged by a larger POC-PET system that has 4 × 6 modules (32 × 32 LYSO crystals/module, four in axial and six in transaxial directions) in the front panel and 3 × 8 modules (16 × 16 LYSO crystals/module, three in axial and eight in transaxial directions) in the back panel. We also evaluated an interactive scanning strategy by progressively increasing the number of data sets used for image reconstruction. The updated images were analyzed based on the number of data sets and the detector CRT. RESULTS The proof-of-concept prototype re-solves most of the spherical lesions despite a limited number of coincidence events and incomplete sampling. TOF information reduces artifacts in the reconstructed images. Systems with better timing resolution exhibit improved image quality and reduced artifacts. We observed a reconstruction speed of 0.96 × 106 events/s/iteration for 600 × 600 × 224 voxel rectilinear space using four GPUs. A POC-PET system with significantly higher sensitivity can interactively image a body-size object from four angles in less than 7 min. CONCLUSIONS We have developed GPU-based fast image reconstruction capability to support a PET system with arbitrary and dynamically changing geometry. Using TOF PET detectors, we demonstrated the feasibility of a PET system that can provide timely visual feedback to an operator who can scan a patient interactively to support POC imaging applications.

[1]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation in Time-of-Flight PET , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. Conti Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Assessment of PSMA targeting ligands bearing novel chelates with application to theranostics: Stability and complexation kinetics of 68Ga3+, 111In3+, 177Lu3+ and 225Ac3. , 2017, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[4]  Dezhuang Ye,et al.  Focused ultrasound‐enabled delivery of radiolabeled nanoclusters to the pons , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  Interrogating Tumor Metabolism and Tumor Microenvironments Using Molecular Positron Emission Tomography Imaging. Theranostic Approaches to Improve Therapeutics , 2013, Pharmacological Reviews.

[6]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Trust Region Newton Method for Logistic Regression , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  J. O'Brien,et al.  PET imaging of brain amyloid in dementia: a review , 2011, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[9]  G. Santin,et al.  GATE: a Geant4-based simulation platform for PET and SPECT integrating movement and time management , 2003 .

[10]  Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile,et al.  PET Tracers for Clinical Imaging of Breast Cancer , 2012, Journal of oncology.

[11]  Mark Smith Image Reconstruction for Prostate Specific Nuclear Medicine imagers , 2007 .

[12]  Joshua W Cates,et al.  Advances in coincidence time resolution for PET , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Defrise,et al.  Time-of-flight PET data determine the attenuation sinogram up to a constant , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  P K Marsden,et al.  Developments in component-based normalization for 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  3-D Tomographic Image Reconstruction from Randomly Ordered Lines with CUDA , 2011 .

[16]  Martin G Pomper,et al.  PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen. , 2013, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[17]  Min Liu,et al.  A novel ligand conjugated nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery , 2016, Drug delivery.

[18]  Kenji Shimazoe,et al.  A prototype of aerial radiation monitoring system using an unmanned helicopter mounting a GAGG scintillator Compton camera , 2016 .

[19]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  ML-reconstruction for TOF-PET with simultaneous estimation of the attenuation factors , 2014, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[20]  Eun-Bae Kim,et al.  Identification of a novel peptide ligand targeting visceral adipose tissue via transdermal route by in vivo phage display , 2011, Journal of drug targeting.

[21]  Yuan-Chuan Tai,et al.  Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  J S Karp,et al.  Design study of an in situ PET scanner for use in proton beam therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Daniel S. Weller,et al.  Regularization parameter trimming for iterative image reconstruction , 2015, 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[24]  J. Karp,et al.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[25]  Eszter Boros,et al.  New Ga derivatives of the H2dedpa scaffold with improved clearance and persistent heart uptake. , 2011, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[26]  Cristina Bianchi,et al.  Personalized Therapy by Phenotype and Genotype , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[27]  Karol Polom,et al.  Nanoparticle as a novel tool in hyperthermic intraperitoneal and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotheprapy to treat patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis , 2017, Oncotarget.

[28]  Kentaro Hirao,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging in Late-Life Depression , 2014, Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology.

[29]  Ke Li,et al.  A generalized reconstruction framework for unconventional PET systems. , 2015, Medical physics.

[30]  Aswin Mathews,et al.  Image reconstruction and system modeling techniques for virtual-pinhole PET insert systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  J. T. Sullivan,et al.  Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of AMG 531, a novel thrombopoietin receptor ligand , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[32]  Martin P. Tornai,et al.  Intraoperative probes and imaging probes , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  Fully 3D list-mode time-of-flight PET image reconstruction on GPUs using CUDA. , 2011, Medical physics.

[34]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Ultrasound Microbubbles for Molecular Diagnosis, Therapy, and Theranostics , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Molecular imaging of myocardial infarction , 2013, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[36]  Mu-Yi Hua,et al.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Martin G Pomper,et al.  Clinical applications of Gallium-68. , 2013, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[38]  Dan M. Roden,et al.  Personalized medicine and the genotype–phenotype dilemma , 2011, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[39]  Neal H. Clinthorne,et al.  Real time image reconstruction using GPUs for a surgical PET imaging probe system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[40]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Virtual-Pinhole PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Johan Bussink,et al.  Molecular PET imaging for biology-guided adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[42]  J. Listgarten,et al.  Personalized medicine: from genotypes, molecular phenotypes and the quantified self, towards improved medicine. , 2014, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[43]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  P. Nguyen,et al.  Fundamentals of Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging: a Review of Concepts and Strategies , 2017, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[45]  Terrence D. Ruddy,et al.  New SPECT and PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging Cardiovascular Disease , 2014, BioMed research international.

[46]  Quing Zhu,et al.  Development of a simultaneous PET/Ultrasound imaging system with near real-time reconstruction capability for point-of-care applications , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[47]  M. V. Nemallapudi,et al.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Jun Zhao,et al.  MicroPET/CT Imaging of AXL Downregulation by HSP90 Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2017, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[49]  Amy M Fowler,et al.  A Molecular Approach to Breast Imaging , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction , 2002 .

[51]  M. Kalia,et al.  Personalized oncology: recent advances and future challenges. , 2013, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[52]  Xue Meng,et al.  New strategy for monitoring targeted therapy: molecular imaging , 2013, International journal of nanomedicine.

[53]  G Pratx,et al.  Fast List-Mode Reconstruction for Time-of-Flight PET Using Graphics Hardware , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[54]  Paul Cumming,et al.  [68Ga]-Albumin-PET in the Monitoring of Left Ventricular Function in Murine Models of Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Cardiac MRI , 2013, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[55]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Alternating Minimization Algorithms for Transmission Tomography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[56]  R. Wahl,et al.  A fiber-optically coupled positron-sensitive surgical probe. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  S. T. G. Bruijnen,et al.  Present Role of Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Peripheral Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review , 2014, Arthritis care & research.

[58]  Joshua D. Evans,et al.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[59]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Theranostic Probes for Cancer Imaging , 2017, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[60]  Neal H. Clinthorne,et al.  Investigation of an internal PET probe for prostate imaging , 2007 .

[61]  R. R. Raylman,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a Prototype High Resolution, Silicon Photomultiplier-Based, Tandem Positron Emission Tomography System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[62]  Lie-Hang Shen,et al.  Recent Advances in Imaging of Dopaminergic Neurons for Evaluation of Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2012, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[63]  O. Schober,et al.  Specific biomarkers of receptors, pathways of inhibition and targeted therapies: clinical applications. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[64]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  Conceptual design of a compact positron tomograph for prostate imaging , 2000 .

[65]  Chin-Tu Chen,et al.  Development of a PET radioligand for potassium channels to image CNS demyelination , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[66]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  A review of current nanoparticle and targeting moieties for the delivery of cancer therapeutics. , 2013, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[67]  A. S. Moses,et al.  Imaging and drug delivery using theranostic nanoparticles. , 2010, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[68]  Dennis R. Schaart,et al.  A comprehensive characterization of the time resolution of the Philips Digital Photon Counter , 2016 .

[69]  Jian Shu,et al.  Multimodal Molecular Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions , 2018, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[70]  Jianxu Li,et al.  A novel small Odorranalectin-bearing cubosomes: preparation, brain delivery and pharmacodynamic study on amyloid-β₂₅₋₃₅-treated rats following intranasal administration. , 2012, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[71]  Zhaoying Bian,et al.  Statistical CT reconstruction using region-aware texture preserving regularization learning from prior normal-dose CT image. , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[72]  M. Salvatore,et al.  Nuclear imaging in cancer theranostics. , 2007, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[73]  Yiping Shao,et al.  Simple charge division readouts for imaging scintillator arrays using a multi-channel PMT , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[74]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography Camera: PEM Flex Solo II , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[75]  Katayoun Saatchi,et al.  Long-circulating non-toxic blood pool imaging agent based on hyperbranched polyglycerols. , 2012, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[76]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Design and Performance of a High Spatial Resolution, Time-of-Flight PET Detector , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[77]  Melissa Haendel,et al.  Capturing phenotypes for precision medicine , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies.

[78]  D. Townsend,et al.  Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/CT scanner , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[79]  Jan J Piek,et al.  Novel molecular imaging ligands targeting matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 for imaging of unstable atherosclerotic plaques , 2017, PloS one.

[80]  Yang Yu,et al.  A Novel Delivery System of Cyclovirobuxine D for Brain Targeting: Angiopep-Conjugated Polysorbate 80-Coated Liposomes via Intranasal Administration. , 2018, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[81]  Michael E Casey,et al.  PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.