Optimal asymmetric one‐sided group sequential tests

We extend the optimal symmetric group sequential tests of Eales & Jennison (1992) to the broader class of asymmetric designs. Two forms of asymmetry are considered, involving unequal type I and type II error rates and different emphases on expected sample sizes at the null and alternative hypotheses. We discuss the properties of our optimal designs and use them to assess the efficiency of the family of tests proposed by Pampallona & Tsiatis (1994) and two families of one-sided tests defined through error spending functions. We show that the error spending designs are highly efficient, while the easily implemented tests of Pampallona & Tsiatis are a little less efficient but still not far from optimal. Our results demonstrate that asymmetric designs can decrease the expected sample size under one hypothesis, but only at the expense of a significantly larger expected sample size under the other hypothesis. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2002, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests , 1992 .

[2]  KyungMann Kim Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Group Sequential Analysis Incorporating Covariate Information , 1997 .

[4]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Group sequential methods for clinical trials with a one-sided hypothesis , 1980 .

[5]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Group sequential designs for one-sided and two-sided hypothesis testing with provision for early stopping in favor of the null hypothesis , 1994 .

[6]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[7]  T. Lai Optimal Stopping and Sequential Tests which Minimize the Maximum Expected Sample Size , 1973 .

[8]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Numerical Computations for Group Sequential Tests , 1999 .

[9]  J. S. D. Cani,et al.  Group sequential designs using a family of type I error probability spending functions. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Sj Senn Consensus and controversy in pharmaceutical statistics. (With discussion) , 2000 .

[11]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Asymmetric group sequential boundaries for monitoring clinical trials , 1982 .

[12]  T R Fleming,et al.  Symmetric group sequential test designs. , 1989, Biometrics.

[13]  Myron N. Chang Optimal designs for group sequential clinical trials , 1996 .

[14]  John Eales,et al.  Optimal two-sided group sequential tests , 1995 .

[15]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Efficient group sequential tests with unpredictable group sizes , 1987 .

[16]  B. Turnbull,et al.  Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[17]  I. K. Hwang,et al.  Group sequential designs using both type I and type II error probability spending functions , 1998 .

[18]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus and controversy in pharmaceutical statistics - Discussion , 2000 .

[19]  Stephen Senn Consensus and Controversy in Pharmaceutical Statistics , 2000 .

[20]  Mohamed A. A. Moussa Discrete Boundaries in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1994 .

[21]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Design and analysis of group sequential tests based on the type I error spending rate function , 1987 .