The Effects of Different Substrates on Ammonium Removal in Constructed Wetlands: A Comparison of Their Physicochemical Characteristics and Ammonium‐Oxidizing Prokaryotic Communities

A vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW) filled with natural zeolite had higher ammonium removal (82.4–94.0%) than another VFCW filled with volcanic rock (51.3–69.4%) treating piggery wastewater under any of three recirculation ratios. To reveal the underling reasons, physicochemical characteristics and ammonium-oxidizing prokaryotes (AOPs) of two substrates were determined. The calculated maximum ammonium adsorption of zeolite (11.6 mg g−1) was remarkably higher than that of volcanic rock (0.21 mg g−1), mainly because the former contains two cationic binding crystalline species, and montmorillonite. Quantitative analyses indicated that ammonium-oxidizing archaea (AOA) are the dominant AOP of zeolite and ammonium-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are the dominant AOP of volcanic rock respectively. Diversity and phylogenetic analysis further showed that both AOB and AOA communities were significantly different between two substrates. Nitrosospira-like AOB (92.6%) and sediment/soil clade AOA (71.4%) were the main components of AOB and AOA in natural zeolite, whereas Nitrosomonas-like AOB (76.1%) and water/sediment clade AOA (77.1%) dominated the AOB and AOA in volcanic rock. These results suggest that the substrates show high selectivity to AOP community. Thus, in addition to physicochemical characteristics, the AOP of substrates is very likely to affect ammonium removal in VFCWs.

[1]  M. Sarioglu.  Removal of ammonium from municipal wastewater using natural Turkish (Dogantepe) zeolite , 2004 .

[2]  Guangzhi Sun,et al.  Enhanced denitrification and organics removal in hybrid wetland columns: comparative experiments. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[3]  C. Criddle,et al.  Ammonia-oxidizing communities in a highly aerated full-scale activated sludge bioreactor: betaproteobacterial dynamics and low relative abundance of Crenarchaea. , 2009, Environmental microbiology.

[4]  J. A. Herrera Melián,et al.  Hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in the Canary Islands , 2010 .

[5]  Susmita Gupta,et al.  Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: a review. , 2008, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[6]  Amit Gross,et al.  A recirculating vertical flow constructed wetland for the treatment of domestic wastewater. , 2009 .

[7]  C. Polprasert,et al.  Abundance of amoA genes of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in activated sludge of full-scale wastewater treatment plants. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Jiachao Zhang,et al.  Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to microbial ammonia oxidation differ under different conditions during agricultural waste composting. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Yueping Jiang,et al.  Soil Microbial Abundances and Enzyme Activities in Different Rhizospheres in an Integrated Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland , 2011 .

[10]  S. Okabe,et al.  Influences of Infaunal Burrows on the Community Structure and Activity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria in Intertidal Sediments , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Nutrient removal in constructed microcosm wetlands for treating polluted river water in northern China , 2011 .

[12]  Xin-Yao Yu,et al.  Comparison of the community structures of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in rhizoplanes of floating aquatic macrophytes. , 2011, Microbiological research.

[13]  S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern,et al.  Rapid and dissimilar response of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria to nitrogen and water amendment in two temperate forest soils. , 2012, Microbiological research.

[14]  H. J. Laanbroek,et al.  Effects of substratum on the diversity and stability of ammonia‐oxidizing communities in a constructed wetland used for wastewater treatment , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[15]  A. Ibekwe,et al.  Characterization of Microbial Communities and Composition in Constructed Dairy Wetland Wastewater Effluent , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  H. Cao,et al.  Spatial distribution and abundances of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in mangrove sediments , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  J. Beman,et al.  Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Yong-guan Zhu,et al.  Ammonia-oxidizing archaea: important players in paddy rhizosphere soil? , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[19]  P. Kemp,et al.  Estimating prokaryotic diversity: When are 16S rDNA libraries large enough? , 2004 .

[20]  W. Liesack,et al.  The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  Isabel Henriques,et al.  Substrate effect on bacterial communities from constructed wetlands planted with Typha latifolia treating industrial wastewater , 2009 .

[22]  Z. Yao,et al.  Treatment of polluted landscape lake water and community analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in constructed wetland , 2009, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[23]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Nitrous oxide emissions from surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetland microcosms: Effect of feeding strategies , 2011 .

[24]  C. Schleper,et al.  The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[25]  Chunming Hu,et al.  Variations in Phosphorus Speciation in Pilot Scale Subsurface Flow Wetlands Constructed with Blast Furnace Slag and Gravel , 2009 .

[26]  S. Zechmeister-Boltenstern,et al.  Nitrifiers and denitrifiers respond rapidly to changed moisture and increasing temperature in a pristine forest soil. , 2010, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[27]  Zhenbin Wu,et al.  Characteristics of the microbial communities in the integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[28]  Ming-Gang Xu,et al.  Quantitative analyses of the abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea of a Chinese upland red soil under long-term fertilization practices. , 2007, Environmental microbiology.

[29]  Noah Fierer,et al.  The Biogeography of Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacterial Communities in Soil , 2009, Microbial Ecology.

[30]  F. Kansiime,et al.  Distribution and activity of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in Nakivubo wastewater channel and wastewater treatment wetland, Uganda , 2006 .

[31]  T. Urich,et al.  Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils , 2006, Nature.

[32]  Aaron Marc Saunders,et al.  Archaea Dominate the Ammonia-Oxidizing Community in the Rhizosphere of the Freshwater Macrophyte Littorella uniflora , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  J. Handelsman,et al.  Introducing DOTUR, a Computer Program for Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  V. Tsihrintzis,et al.  Effluent quality improvement of two pilot-scale, horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using natural zeolite (clinoptilolite) , 2009 .

[35]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Environmental factors shaping the ecological niches of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. , 2009, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[36]  G. Reddy,et al.  Sorption and desorption of ammonium by zeolite: Batch and column studies , 2011, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.