Estimating Canopy Chlorophyll Concentration from Field and Airborne Spectra

This article investigates the effects of both soil contamination and nitrogen application on the red edge–chlorophyll concentration relationship for a vegetation canopy. Field based canopy reflectance and chlorophyll concentration data were collected at a grassland field site affected by soil contamination and a winter wheat field site affected by different levels of nitrogen fertilisation. The correlation between red edge position (REP) and canopy chlorophyll concentration was r=0.84 and 0.80 for the grassland and winter wheat field sites, respectively. Airborne imaging spectrometry was used to generate REP images (units, nm) of the grassland and winter wheat field sites. Strong correlations were observed between REP and canopy chlorophyll concentration at both field sites. Predictive regression equations were developed to map canopy chlorophyll concentration across the field sites. The rms error of estimated chlorophyll concentration was 0.42 mg g−1 (±12.69% of mean) and 2.09 mg g−1(±16.4% of mean) at the grassland and winter wheat field sites respectively. Results demonstrated the use of remotely sensed estimates of the REP from both field and airborne spectrometers for estimating chlorophyll concentration and indicated the potential of this technique for inferring both land contamination and grain yield.

[1]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  MERIS potential for land applications , 1999 .

[2]  W. R. Windham,et al.  Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll concentration in slash pine leaves. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[3]  Feasibility of the red edge index for the detection of nitrogen deficiency. , 1991 .

[4]  J. Dungan,et al.  Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine. , 1990, Tree physiology.

[5]  P. Curran,et al.  Technical Note Grass chlorophyll and the reflectance red edge , 1996 .

[6]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The red edge position and shape as indicators of plant chlorophyll content, biomass and hydric status. , 1994 .

[7]  E. K. Harris,et al.  Multivariate Interpretation of Clinical Laboratory Data , 1987 .

[8]  G. Mackinney,et al.  ABSORPTION OF LIGHT BY CHLOROPHYLL SOLUTIONS , 1941 .

[9]  B. Rock,et al.  Comparison of in situ and airborne spectral measurements of the blue shift associated with forest decline , 1988 .

[10]  P. J. Curran,et al.  The importance of measurement error for certain procedures in remote sensing at optical wavelengths , 1986 .

[11]  John B. Schutt,et al.  A laboratory investigation of a physical rnechanisim for the extended infrared absorption ('red shift') in wheat , 1984 .

[12]  Paul J. Curran,et al.  Remote sensing the biochemical composition of a slash pine canopy , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  D. Horler,et al.  The red edge of plant leaf reflectance , 1983 .

[14]  Lalji Dixit,et al.  Quantitative Analysis by Derivative Electronic Spectroscopy , 1985 .

[15]  Paul J. Curran,et al.  The relationship between red edge and chlorophyll concentration in the Broadbalk winter wheat experiment at Rothamsted , 1994 .

[16]  G. Bonham-Carter.  Numerical procedures and computer program for fitting an inverted Gaussian model to vegetation reflectance data , 1988 .

[17]  John R. Miller,et al.  Quantitative characterization of the vegetation red edge reflectance 1. An inverted-Gaussian reflectance model , 1990 .

[18]  J. Dungan,et al.  The effect of a red leaf pigment on the relationship between red edge and chlorophyll concentration , 1991 .