Conditional non-expected utility preferences induced by mixture of lotteries: a note on the normative invalidity of expected utility theory

This research note is concerned with static choices between alternative mixtures of lotteries with one common mixture component and identical mixture weights. It is shown that the common component induces a conditional preference relation on the underlying lottery space with given (unconditional) preference structure. Induced preferences of this type arise in the comparisons with which the independence axiom of expected utility theory is specifically concerned. Given a few obvious properties of the induced preferences, two basic results are obtained: first, the conditionalisation operation is an order-preserving isomorphism, and, secondly, if the conditional preferences satisfy stochastic dominance preference, they necessarily violate the independence axiom. Together, the two results preclude any possibility of postulating independence consistently for static decision making under risk. The independence axiom is thus generally invalid as a normative principle of rational risky choice.

[1]  Subjective Expected Utility , 2014 .

[2]  Jeroen van de Ven,et al.  Aspiration Level, Probability of Success and Failure, and Expected Utility , 2008 .

[3]  C. Starmer Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[4]  Paul E. Pfeiffer Probability for Applications , 1989 .

[5]  A. Nebout Sequential decision making without independence: a new conceptual approach , 2014 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[7]  John W. Pratt,et al.  Aversion to one risk in the presence of others , 1988 .

[8]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Harris Schlesinger,et al.  Multiplicative Background Risk , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[10]  N. Karoui,et al.  Optimal investment decisions when time-horizon is uncertain , 2008 .

[11]  John A. Weymark,et al.  Measurement theory and the foundations of utilitarianism , 2005, Social Choice and Welfare.

[12]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Temporal von neumann-morgenstern and induced preferences , 1979 .

[13]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory , 1978 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[15]  Uzi Segal The Independence Axiom Versus the Reduction Axiom: Must We Have Both? , 1992 .

[16]  M. Machina Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty , 1989 .

[17]  Lionel Martellini,et al.  Static Mean-Variance Analysis with Uncertain Time Horizon , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Y. Malevergne,et al.  Preserving preference rankings under non-financial background risk , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Mark J. Machina,et al.  Temporal risk and the nature of induced preferences , 1984 .

[20]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Lottery dependent utility , 1987 .

[21]  P. Hammond,et al.  Rationality and Dynamic Consistency under Risk and Uncertainty , 2013 .

[22]  P. Wakker,et al.  Dynamic Choice and NonExpected Utility , 1998 .

[23]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Risky Choices and Correlated Background Risk , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Marciano M. Siniscalchi,et al.  Dynamic Choice Under Ambiguity , 2006 .

[25]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Two Stage Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom , 1990 .

[26]  Gebhard Geiger,et al.  An axiomatic account of status quo-dependent non-expected utility: Pragmatic constraints on rational choice under risk , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[27]  Ingram Olkin,et al.  Life Distributions: Structure of Nonparametric, Semiparametric, and Parametric Families , 2007 .

[28]  H. Bleichrodt,et al.  A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory , 2008 .

[29]  John Quiggin,et al.  Background risk in generalized expected utility theory , 2003 .

[30]  Marciano M. Siniscalchi,et al.  Dynamic choice under ambiguity: Dynamic choice under ambiguity , 2011 .

[31]  Edi Karni,et al.  Atemporal dynamic consistency and expected utility theory , 1991 .

[32]  Maxim Finkelstein,et al.  Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk , 2008 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[34]  Gebhard Geiger Multi-attribute non-expected utility , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[35]  Kei Takeuchi,et al.  Projection Matrices, Generalized Inverse Matrices, and Singular Value Decomposition , 2011 .