Optically tracked neuronavigation increases the stability of hand-held focal coil positioning: Evidence from “transcranial” magnetic stimulation-induced electrical field measurements

The stability of hand-held coil positioning with neuronavigated versus conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is still underinvestigated. Eleven operators naïve for neuronavigation were asked to position and maintain a figure-of-eight-shaped coil over a dipole probe placed within of a polystyrene reproduction of the human head and scalp, in correspondence of the right primary motor cortex. Ten monophasic magnetic pulses were delivered at 46% maximal stimulator output (MSO) in two different experimental conditions: (1) assisted by an optically tracked neuronavigational system; and (2) without neuronavigation. With neuronavigated stimulation, both standard deviation and coefficient of variation of the voltages induced in the dipole probe were significantly lower than without neuronavigation. Results were confirmed in four operators performing a longer-lasting experiment using 50 magnetic pulses in each condition, at an intensity of at 40% MSO. Findings show that optically tracked neuronavigation improves the stability of focal coil positioning.

[1]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Petro Julkunen,et al.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Esa Mervaala,et al.  Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Charles M. Epstein,et al.  Localizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation in humans , 1990, Neurology.

[7]  N. Branston,et al.  The measurement of electric field, and the influence of surface charge, in magnetic stimulation. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Cyrill v. Tiesenhausen,et al.  The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[9]  G. Zaccara,et al.  Physical interactions between induced electrical fields can have substantial effects on neuronal excitation during simultaneous TMS of two brain areas , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.