Numerical simulation of a methane/air radiating turbulent diffusion flame

Reports numerical simulations of an unconfined methane‐air turbulent diffusion flame expanding from a porous burner. Turbulent combustion is simulated using the eddy dissipation concept (EDC) which supposes that the reaction rate is controlled by the turbulent structures which enhance the mixing of fuel and oxidant. Two statistical k‐e turbulence models have been tested: a standard high Reynolds number (HRN) and a more recent model based on the renormalization group theory (RNG). Radiation heat transfer and soot formation have been taken into account using P1‐approximation and transport submodels which reproduce the main phenomena encountered during soot production (nucleation, coagulation, surface growth). The set of coupled transport equations is solved numerically using a high order finite‐volume method, the velocity‐pressure coupling is treated by a projection technique. The numerical results confirm that 20‐25 percent of the combustion heat released is radiated away from the flame. Unsteady and unsymmetrical flame behaviour is observed for small Froude numbers which results from the development of Rayleigh‐Taylor like instabilities outside the flame surface. For higher Froude numbers the steady‐state and symmetrical nature of the solution is recovered.

[1]  O. Pironneau,et al.  Analysis of the K-epsilon turbulence model , 1994 .

[2]  R. Borghi,et al.  Soot formation modeling for turbulent flames , 1997 .

[3]  C. G. Speziale On nonlinear K-l and K-ε models of turbulence , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  G. Cox,et al.  Combustion fundamentals of fire , 1995 .

[5]  Leslie M. Smith,et al.  The renormalization group, the ɛ-expansion and derivation of turbulence models , 1992 .

[6]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986, Physical review letters.

[7]  Suhas V. Patankar,et al.  A Calculation Procedure for Two-Dimensional Elliptic Situations , 1981 .

[8]  Marcel Zijlema,et al.  Finite volume computation of incompressible turbulent flows in general co‐ordinates on staggered grids , 1995 .

[9]  Christopher R. Shaddix,et al.  Computations of enhanced soot production in time-varying CH4/air diffusion flames , 1996 .

[10]  W. Jones,et al.  Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: A review , 1982 .

[11]  R. Schiestel,et al.  Modélisation et simulation des écoulements turbulents , 1993 .

[12]  Robert W. Bilger Turbulent diffusion flames , 1989 .

[13]  B. Farouk,et al.  Laminar and Turbulent Natural Convection-Radiation Interactions in a Square Enclosure Filled with a Nongray Gas , 1989 .

[14]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Why You Should Not Use 'Hybrid', 'Power-Law' or Related Exponential Schemes for Convective Modelling—There Are Much Better Alternatives , 1995 .

[15]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer , 2020 .

[16]  F. Williams,et al.  Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1981 .

[17]  V. Katta,et al.  Flame-vortex dynamics in an inverse partially premixed combustor - The Froude number effects , 1997 .

[18]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986 .

[19]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[20]  K.N.C. Bray,et al.  The challenge of turbulent combustion , 1996 .

[21]  W. M. Roquemore,et al.  Preliminary results of a numerical-experimental study of the dynamic structure of a buoyant jet diffusion flame , 1991 .

[22]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  Beyond first‐order upwinding: The ultra‐sharp alternative for non‐oscillatory steady‐state simulation of convection , 1990 .

[23]  R. Borghi Turbulent combustion modelling , 1988 .

[24]  John Leask Lumley,et al.  Simulation and modeling of turbulent flows , 1996 .

[25]  E. Oran,et al.  DYNAMICS OF A STRONGLY RADIATING UNSTEADY ETHYLENE JET DIFFUSION FLAME , 1994 .