Internal and external influences on adoption decisions in multi-unit firms: the moderating effect of experience

Facing uncertainty about whether to adopt a new technology, firms rely on both external and internal sources of information. Firms may learn vicariously about the desirability of adoption; a large body of research has demonstrated a tendency for firms to imitate rival adopters. Organizations with multiple units may also learn from their own experience once an initial unit of the firm has adopted. This article uses data on the establishment of websites by consumer magazines during the early internet era to test the hypothesis that multi-unit firms pay less attention to rivals after an initial unit of the firm has adopted. Consistent with this hypothesis, it is found that the influence of rivals drops sharply following the initial adoption. One explanation for the shift is that vicarious learning becomes less valuable once richer information becomes available from internal sources.

[1]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Dancing with Strangers: Aspiration Performance and the Search for Underwriting Syndicate Partners , 2005 .

[2]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Structural Inertia, Imitation, and Foreign Expansion: South Korean Firms and Business Groups in China, 1987–1995 , 2002 .

[3]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[4]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[5]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Revenue streams and digital content providers: an empirical investigation , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Alan Miles,et al.  Beyond Print: A Future for Magazines , 1999 .

[7]  Kristina B. Dahlin,et al.  Aspiration Performance and Railroads' Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Stephen P. Jenkins,et al.  Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration Models , 1995 .

[9]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[10]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains' Acquisitions , 2000 .

[11]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Organizations , 2002 .

[12]  John W. Meyer.  Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure explaining the structure of educational organizations , 1980 .

[13]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[14]  R. Prentice,et al.  Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. , 1978, Biometrics.

[15]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[16]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry , 1998 .

[19]  E. P. Michael.  Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[20]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[21]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[22]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Chain Affiliation and the Failure of Manhattan Hotels, 1898-1980 , 1997 .

[23]  John B. Meisel,et al.  Market Structure, Uncertainty, and Intrafirm Diffusion: The Case of Optical Scanners in Grocery Stores , 1992 .

[24]  H. Greve.  Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[25]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[27]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology , 1981 .

[28]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting , 1996 .

[29]  Ulrich Kaiser,et al.  The Effects of Website Provision on the Demand for German Women's Magazines , 2001 .

[30]  Joanna Barsh,et al.  Magazines' Home Companion , 2001 .

[31]  Daniel H. Simon,et al.  The effect of a magazine's free digital content on its print circulation: Cannibalization or complementarity? , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[32]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  Rival Precedence and the Dynamics of Technology Adoption: An Empirical Analysis , 1987 .

[33]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach , 1981 .

[34]  Brent D. Beal,et al.  Explaining the Clustering of International Expansion Moves: A Critical Test in the U.S. Telecommunications Industry , 2005 .

[35]  Avi Goldfarb.  Concentration in advertising-supported online markets: an empirical approach , 2004 .

[36]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment , 1995 .

[37]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Why Do Firms Imitate Each Other , 2006 .

[38]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .