Morphological Computation and Morphological Control: Steps Toward a Formal Theory and Applications

Morphological computation can be loosely defined as the exploitation of the shape, material properties, and physical dynamics of a physical system to improve the efficiency of a computation. Morphological control is the application of morphological computing to a control task. In its theoretical part, this article sharpens and extends these definitions by suggesting new formalized definitions and identifying areas in which the definitions we propose are still inadequate. We go on to describe three ongoing studies, in which we are applying morphological control to problems in medicine and in chemistry. The first involves an inflatable support system for patients with impaired movement, and is based on macroscopic physics and concepts already tested in robotics. The two other case studies (self-assembly of chemical microreactors; models of induced cell repair in radio-oncology) describe processes and devices on the micrometer scale, in which the emergent dynamics of the underlying physical system (e.g., phase transitions) are dominated by stochastic processes such as diffusion.

[1]  Stephan Scheidegger,et al.  Kinetic Model for Dose Equivalent - an Efficient Way to Predict Systems Response of Irradiated Cells , 2011, Simul. Notes Eur..

[2]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  L. Munari How the body shapes the way we think — a new view of intelligence , 2009 .

[4]  M. G. Finn,et al.  Click Chemistry: Diverse Chemical Function from a Few Good Reactions , 2001 .

[5]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Beyond molecules: Self-assembly of mesoscopic and macroscopic components , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Surya Girinatha Nurzaman,et al.  Guided Self-Organization in a Dynamic Embodied System Based on Attractor Selection Mechanism , 2014, Entropy.

[7]  E Mildner,et al.  [Influence of ski boots on balance performance]. , 2010, Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft fur Orthopadisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin.

[8]  R. H. Luchsinger,et al.  The new structural concept Tensairity : Basic principles , 2005 .

[9]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[10]  M. Tewari,et al.  The Limits of Reductionism in Medicine: Could Systems Biology Offer an Alternative? , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[11]  J. Collins,et al.  Vibrating insoles and balance control in elderly people , 2003, The Lancet.

[12]  Uwe Tangen,et al.  Enzyme-like Replication de Novo in a Microcontroller Environment , 2010, Artificial Life.

[13]  Aleksandar Donev,et al.  Neighbor list collision-driven molecular dynamics simulation for nonspherical hard particles. , 2005 .

[14]  R M Füchslin,et al.  Evolutionary self-organization of cell-free genetic coding , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Harald Haas,et al.  Harnessing Nonlinearity: Predicting Chaotic Systems and Saving Energy in Wireless Communication , 2004, Science.

[16]  Markus Flatz,et al.  Effects of Modern Ski Equipment on the Overall Injury Rate and the Pattern of Injury Location in Alpine Skiing , 2008, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[17]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Self-Assembly at All Scales , 2002, Science.

[18]  M. G. Lauby,et al.  A balancing act , 2011, Nature Immunology.

[19]  Tao Li,et al.  Information processing via physical soft body , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[20]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Evolving Inductive Generalization via Genetic Self-Assembly , 2006, Adv. Complex Syst..

[21]  John A. Pelesko,et al.  Self Assembly: The Science of Things That Put Themselves Together , 2007 .

[22]  Richard Sproat,et al.  Morphology and computation , 1992 .

[23]  M. Reimold,et al.  Toward replicatable, multifunctional, nanoscaffolded machines. A chemical manifesto , 2003 .

[24]  Henry Markram,et al.  Real-Time Computing Without Stable States: A New Framework for Neural Computation Based on Perturbations , 2002, Neural Computation.

[25]  S G Nurzaman,et al.  Goal-directed multimodal locomotion through coupling between mechanical and attractor selection dynamics. , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[26]  J. Reif,et al.  Logical computation using algorithmic self-assembly of DNA triple-crossover molecules , 2000, Nature.

[27]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  J. Costa,et al.  Systems medicine in oncology , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[29]  D. Ingber Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[30]  R. H. Luchsinger,et al.  A Novel Pneumatic Actuator With Tensairity , 2010 .

[31]  S. Brown,et al.  Balancing act. , 1996, The Canadian nurse.

[32]  Chi‐Huey Wong,et al.  Complex carbohydrate synthesis tools for glycobiologists: enzyme-based approach and programmable one-pot strategies. , 2000, Glycobiology.

[33]  P. Eggenberger,et al.  Evolving the morphology of a compound eye on a robot , 1999, 1999 Third European Workshop on Advanced Mobile Robots (Eurobot'99). Proceedings (Cat. No.99EX355).

[34]  D. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[35]  Helmut Hauser,et al.  Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  K. Kremer,et al.  Aggregation and vesiculation of membrane proteins by curvature-mediated interactions , 2007, Nature.

[37]  Doron Lancet,et al.  The MATCHIT Automaton: Exploiting Compartmentalization for the Synthesis of Branched Polymers , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[38]  P. Rothemund Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[39]  Jeff Jones,et al.  On the role of the plasmodial cytoskeleton in facilitating intelligent behavior in slime mold Physarum polycephalum , 2015, Communicative & integrative biology.

[40]  MustardJessica,et al.  Bioelectrical Mechanisms for Programming Growth and Form: Taming Physiological Networks for Soft Body Robotics , 2014 .

[41]  H. Ritter,et al.  The cognitive nature of action - functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science, and robotics. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[42]  Maik Hadorn,et al.  DNA-Mediated Self-Assembly of Artificial Vesicles , 2010, PloS one.

[43]  Keyan Zahedi,et al.  Quantifying Morphological Computation , 2013, Entropy.

[44]  Grzegorz Rozenberg,et al.  The many facets of natural computing , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[45]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  A Field Guide to Genetic Programming , 2008 .

[46]  T McGeer,et al.  Dynamics and control of bipedal locomotion. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[47]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence (Bradford Books) , 2006 .

[48]  J.D. Harry,et al.  Balancing act [noise based sensory enhancement technology] , 2005, IEEE Spectrum.

[49]  Stephan Scheidegger,et al.  A LQ-based kinetic model formulation for exploring dynamics of treatment response of tumours in patients. , 2011, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[50]  Norman Packard,et al.  Geometry-induced asymmetric diffusion , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.