Effect of Gates Glidden, La Axxess, SX and ultrasound on the circularity and area of mesial canals of mandibular molars

Introduction: Biomechanical preparation must provide a taper shape at crown-apex direction for root canal resulting in adequate space for irrigation and enabling an effective obturation. However, this stage requires a cervical preparation aiming to remove the interferences to make the access to the apical portion easy for instrumentation. Objective: To evaluate in vitro the effect of coronal flaring on the root canal area and in the circularity of mesial canals of lower molars after using Gates Glidden, La Axxess, Sx file or a ultrasonic TU-24tip. Material and methods: Twenty-four lower molars had their roots embedded into acrylic resin. Then the roots were sectioned horizontally at 2 mm below the cementenamel junction. The sections were photographed before and after the different coronal flaring. All images were analyzed using Image J software to calculate the root canal area and the circularity of the root canal. One-way Anova was used to compare the circularity among the groups, while Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparing the areas. A Pearson test was used to correlate root canal area and circularity data. Results: There was no significant difference among the groups neither for the circularity (p > 0.05) nor for the

[1]  R. Cunha,et al.  Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  E. Souza,et al.  The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Robert,et al.  Furcation Morphology Relative to Periodontal Treatment , 2011 .

[4]  A. Mahran,et al.  Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  J. D. PÉcora,et al.  Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis. , 2008, Brazilian dental journal.

[6]  J. V. Baldi,et al.  Evaluation of apical cavity preparation with a new type of ultrasonic diamond tip. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  F. Barletta,et al.  Location and angulation of curvatures of mesiobucal canals of mandibular molars debrided by three endodontic techniques. , 2007, Brazilian oral research.

[8]  P. Wesselink,et al.  The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[9]  P. Wesselink,et al.  The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  Ultrasonic condensation of gutta-percha: the effect of power setting and activation time on temperature rise at the root surface - an in vitro study. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[11]  S. Dorn,et al.  The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. , 2004, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[12]  M-K Wu,et al.  The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[13]  M. Hülsmann,et al.  A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[14]  D C Brown,et al.  A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[15]  S Kuttler,et al.  The endodontic cube: a system designed for evaluation of root canal anatomy and canal preparation. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  B. Boniface,et al.  Five methods of calcium hydroxide intracanal placement: an in vitro evaluation. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[17]  I. Bonetti,et al.  A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  L S Buchanan,et al.  The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. , 1999, Dentistry today.

[19]  J. Baumgartner,et al.  Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  C M Bramante,et al.  A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  A. L. Frank,et al.  The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. , 1980, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[22]  R. C. Bower,et al.  Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture. , 1979, Journal of periodontology.

[23]  S. W. Schneider,et al.  A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.