Effect of Gates Glidden, La Axxess, SX and ultrasound on the circularity and area of mesial canals of mandibular molars
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Cunha,et al. Assessment of the separation incidence of mtwo files used with preflaring: prospective clinical study. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.
[2] E. Souza,et al. The impact of post preparation on the residual dentin thickness of maxillary molars. , 2011, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[3] Robert,et al. Furcation Morphology Relative to Periodontal Treatment , 2011 .
[4] A. Mahran,et al. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.
[5] J. D. PÉcora,et al. Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis. , 2008, Brazilian dental journal.
[6] J. V. Baldi,et al. Evaluation of apical cavity preparation with a new type of ultrasonic diamond tip. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.
[7] F. Barletta,et al. Location and angulation of curvatures of mesiobucal canals of mandibular molars debrided by three endodontic techniques. , 2007, Brazilian oral research.
[8] P. Wesselink,et al. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. , 2007, International endodontic journal.
[9] P. Wesselink,et al. The risk of furcal perforation in mandibular molars using Gates-Glidden drills with anticurvature pressure. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[10] K. Gulabivala,et al. Ultrasonic condensation of gutta-percha: the effect of power setting and activation time on temperature rise at the root surface - an in vitro study. , 2004, International endodontic journal.
[11] S. Dorn,et al. The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars. , 2004, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[12] M-K Wu,et al. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. , 2003, International endodontic journal.
[13] M. Hülsmann,et al. A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni-Ti instruments. , 2001, International endodontic journal.
[14] D C Brown,et al. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators. , 2001, International endodontic journal.
[15] S Kuttler,et al. The endodontic cube: a system designed for evaluation of root canal anatomy and canal preparation. , 2001, Journal of endodontics.
[16] B. Boniface,et al. Five methods of calcium hydroxide intracanal placement: an in vitro evaluation. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.
[17] I. Bonetti,et al. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.
[18] L S Buchanan,et al. The standardized-taper root canal preparation, Part 1: Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments. , 1999, Dentistry today.
[19] J. Baumgartner,et al. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.
[20] C M Bramante,et al. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.
[21] A. L. Frank,et al. The anticurvature filing method to prepare the curved root canal. , 1980, Journal of the American Dental Association.
[22] R. C. Bower,et al. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture. , 1979, Journal of periodontology.
[23] S. W. Schneider,et al. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.